IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v62y2009i2p200-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market-resistance and Valentine's Day events

Author

Listed:
  • Close, Angeline G.
  • Zinkhan, George M.

Abstract

Extending resistance theories, this article examines multi-method data spanning over seven years of events related to a holiday market. In the context of Valentine's Day, the authors present findings and develop knowledge on anti-consumption and alternative consumption. Specifically, this article introduces the recurring events of gift-resistance, retail-resistance, and market-resistance. Such consumer resistance often coexists with movements towards individualism and creation of more unique alternative consumption traditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Close, Angeline G. & Zinkhan, George M., 2009. "Market-resistance and Valentine's Day events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 200-207, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:62:y:2009:i:2:p:200-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(08)00042-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Lee, Michael S.W. & Motion, Judith & Conroy, Denise, 2009. "Anti-consumption and brand avoidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 169-180, February.
    3. Reilly, Michael D & Wallendorf, Melanie, 1987. "A Comparison of Group Differences in Food Consumption Using Household Refuse," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(2), pages 289-294, September.
    4. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    5. Kleine, Susan Schultz & Kleine, Robert E, III & Allen, Chris T, 1995. "How Is a Possession "Me" or "Not Me"? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 327-343, December.
    6. Wallendorf, Melanie & Arnould, Eric J, 1991. ""We Gather Together": Consumption Rituals of Thanksgiving Day," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 13-31, June.
    7. Solomon, Michael R. & Buchanan, Bruce, 1991. "A role-theoretic approach to product symbolism: Mapping a consumption constellation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 95-109, March.
    8. Lee, Michael S.W. & Fernandez, Karen V. & Hyman, Michael R., 2009. "Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 145-147, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Hieu P. & Munch, James M., 2011. "Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 113-118, February.
    2. Clinton Amos & Nancy Spears & Iryna Pentina, 2016. "Rhetorical Analysis of Resistance to Environmentalism As Enactment of Morality Play between Social and Ecological Well-Being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 224-259, March.
    3. Marco Wolf & Shaun McQuitty, 2011. "Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(3), pages 154-170, December.
    4. Sung, Eunyoung (Christine), 2021. "The effects of augmented reality mobile app advertising: Viral marketing via shared social experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 75-87.
    5. Monika Kavaliauske & Edita Simanaviciute, 2015. "Brand Avoidance: Relations Between Brand-Related Stimuli And Negative Emotions," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 6(1).
    6. Akbar, Payam & Mai, Robert & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2016. "When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4215-4224.
    7. Givi, Julian, 2021. "When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 393-405.
    8. Givi, Julian, 2020. "(Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 87-98.
    9. Akbar, Payam & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2020. "Creating value in product service systems through sharing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 495-505.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    3. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    4. Monika Kavaliauske & Edita Simanaviciute, 2015. "Brand Avoidance: Relations Between Brand-Related Stimuli And Negative Emotions," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 6(1).
    5. Justyna Kramarczyk & Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2022. "Accumulative vs. Appreciative Expressions of Materialism: Revising Materialism in Light of Polish Simplifiers and New Materialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 701-719, February.
    6. Korkman, Oskar & Storbacka, Kaj & Harald, Bo, 2010. "Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 236-247.
    7. Schiffman, Leon G. & Cohn, Deborah Y., 2009. "Are they playing by the same rules? A consumer gifting classification of marital dyads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1054-1062, November.
    8. Piacentini, Maria G. & Banister, Emma N., 2009. "Managing anti-consumption in an excessive drinking culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 279-288, February.
    9. Bradford, Tonya Williams & Sherry, John F., 2013. "Orchestrating rituals through retailers: An examination of gift registry," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 158-175.
    10. Takhar, Amandeep & Jamal, Ahmad & Kizgin, Hatice, 2021. "Transcultural identity development among third generation minority consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 132-142.
    11. Murat Hakan Altintas & Bahar F. Kurtulmusoglu & Hans Ruediger Kaufmann & Serkan Kilic, 2013. "Consumer boycotts of foreign products: a metric model," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 485-504, June.
    12. Roberta Sebastiani & Francesca Montagnini & Daniele Dalli, 2013. "Ethical Consumption and New Business Models in the Food Industry. Evidence from the Eataly Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 473-488, May.
    13. Adèle Martin-Gruen & Denis Darpy, 2015. "The Role of Design in the Appropriation of Shared Objects: Autolib in Paris," Post-Print hal-01226746, HAL.
    14. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    15. Guido, Gianluigi & Pino, Giovanni & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2016. "Assessing individuals' re-gifting motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5956-5963.
    16. de Waal Malefyt, Timothy, 2015. "Relationship advertising: How advertising can enhance social bonds," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2494-2502.
    17. Hartmann, Benjamin J. & Brunk, Katja H., 2019. "Nostalgia marketing and (re-)enchantment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 669-686.
    18. Pangarkar, Aniruddha & Shukla, Paurav & Taylor, Charles R. “Ray”, 2021. "Minimalism in consumption: A typology and brand engagement strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 167-178.
    19. Katherine C. Sredl & Ružica Butigan & Nataša Renko, 2012. "Intergenerational influence and rituals - children’s behaviour with new school year," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 24(1), pages 103-116.
    20. Andrea Davies & James Fitchett, 2015. "In the Family Way: Bringing a Mother-Daughter (Matrilineal) Perspective to Retail Innovation and Consumer Culture," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(3), pages 727-743, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:62:y:2009:i:2:p:200-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.