IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1400-d144189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Meehee Cho

    (College of Hotel and Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Mark A. Bonn

    (Dedman School of Hospitality, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA)

  • Su Jin Han

    (Department of Business Administration, Hoseo University, Cheonan-si 330-996, Korea)

Abstract

Generation Z (Gen Z), the future of America’s workforce, is forecasted to represent more than 30 million persons by 2020. Volunteer rates have been declining since 2002. Most compelling is that overall lowest volunteer rates were found to be within the Gen Z segment, with expectations of continued decline. Thus, this study explored motivations associated with sustainable volunteering by Gen Z based upon past research that documented intent to volunteer is strongly associated with age. In doing so, the Volunteer Functions Inventory was adopted to identify Gen Z motivations for volunteering. This study then employed the theory of planned behavior to test the relationships between Gen Z volunteering motivations, their attitudes and job performance using data obtained from 306 Gen Z volunteer special event participants. Among five motives identified to be important to Gen Z, only four motives (“value”, “career”, “learning” and “self-esteem”) were found to significantly influence their attitudes. The ‘social’ motive was found to have no significant effect on their attitudes towards volunteering. This research framework was supported by validating the significant relationships between volunteer motivations, attitudes and job performance specific to the Gen Z volunteer segment. “Job training appropriateness” was found to be an important moderator for improving the relationships between Gen Z volunteer attitudes and job performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2018. "Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1400-:d:144189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niki Koutrou & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous & Anna Johnson, 2016. "Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Elsa Kristiansen & Berit Skirstad & Milena M. Parent & Ivan Waddington, 2015. "‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 256-267, April.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Kristiansen, Elsa & Skirstad, Berit & Parent, Milena M. & Waddington, Ivan, 2015. "‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 256-267.
    5. Costa, Carla A. & Chalip, Laurence & Christine Green, B. & Simes, Caet, 2006. "Reconsidering the Role of Training in Event Volunteers' Satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 165-182, September.
    6. Angela M. Benson & Tracey J. Dickson & F. Anne Terwiel & Deborah A. Blackman, 2014. "Training of Vancouver 2010 volunteers: a legacy opportunity?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 210-226, June.
    7. Prayag, Girish & Hosany, Sameer & Nunkoo, Robin & Alders, Taila, 2013. "London residents' support for the 2012 Olympic Games: The mediating effect of overall attitude," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 629-640.
    8. Lai, Wen-Tai & Chen, Ching-Fu, 2011. "Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 318-325, March.
    9. Karl Pajo & Louise Lee, 2011. "Corporate-Sponsored Volunteering: A Work Design Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 467-482, March.
    10. Geoff Nichols & Rita Ralston, 2012. "Lessons from the Volunteering Legacy of the 2002 Commonwealth Games," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 169-184, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Canova, Luciano & Paladino, Giovanna, 2023. "Gen Z, Personality Traits and Sustainability Awareness: An Econometric Investigation," MPRA Paper 115960, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mateusz Rozmiarek & Joanna Poczta & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2021. "Motivations of Sports Volunteers at the 2023 European Games in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Sorin George Toma & Oana Simona Hudea, 2024. "Generation Z Students’ Perceptions on the Abilities, Skills and Competencies Required in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Systems," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 162-162, February.
    4. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Kristína Koltnerová & Dagmar Cagáňová, 2020. "Perceived Organizational Performance in Recruiting and Retaining Employees with Respect to Different Generational Groups of Employees and Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niki Koutrou & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous & Anna Johnson, 2016. "Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Kristína Pompurová & Radka Marčeková & Ľubica Šebová & Jana Sokolová & Matej Žofaj, 2018. "Volunteer Tourism as a Sustainable Form of Tourism—The Case of Organized Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Wicker, Pamela, 2017. "Volunteerism and volunteer management in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 325-337.
    4. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    5. Hamid Mahmood Gelaidan & Abdullah Al-Swidi & Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, 2023. "Studying the Joint Effects of Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Benefits, and Environmental Concerns in Sustainable Travel Behavior: Extending the TPB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-57.
    7. Casper, Jonathan M. & Gray, Dianna P. & Babkes Stellino, Megan, 2007. "A Sport Commitment Model Perspective on Adult Tennis Players' Participation Frequency and Purchase Intention," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 253-278, November.
    8. Elena Higueras-Castillo & Sebastian Molinillo & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2019. "Perceived Value and Customer Adoption of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Vo, Nguyen S. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing intention to use on-demand shared ride-hailing services in Vietnam: risk, cost or sustainability?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. De Vos, Jonas, 2018. "Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 261-274.
    11. Pan, Jing Yu & Truong, Dothang, 2018. "Passengers’ intentions to use low-cost carriers: An extended theory of planned behavior model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 38-48.
    12. De Vos, Jonas & Witlox, Frank, 2017. "Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 364-373.
    13. Mohammed Aminu Sualihu & M. Arifur Rahman & Zakiya Tofik-Abu, 2017. "The Payment Behavior of Water Utility Customers in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: An Empirical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    14. Lorelei Schmitt & Graham Currie & Alexa Delbosc, 2015. "Lost in transit? Unfamiliar public transport travel explored using a journey planner web survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 101-122, January.
    15. Jonas De Vos & Long Cheng & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Do changes in the residential location lead to changes in travel attitudes? A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2011-2034, August.
    16. Qing Yuan & HakJun Song & Nan Chen & Wenwen Shang, 2019. "Roles of Tourism Involvement and Place Attachment in Determining Residents’ Attitudes Toward Industrial Heritage Tourism in a Resource-Exhausted City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Yuan Yuan & Chunfu Shao & Zhichao Cao & Chaoying Yin, 2023. "The Effect of Travel-Chain Complexity on Public Transport Travel Intention: A Mixed-Selection Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Chee, Pei Nen Esther & Susilo, Yusak O. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2020. "Determinants of intention-to-use first-/last-mile automated bus service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 350-375.
    19. Moghavvemi, Sedigheh & Woosnam, Kyle M. & Paramanathan, Tanuosha & Musa, Ghazali & Hamzah, Amran, 2017. "The effect of residents’ personality, emotional solidarity, and community commitment on support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 242-254.
    20. Jonas De Vos & E. Owen D. Waygood & Laurence Letarte & Mengqiu Cao, 2022. "Do frequent satisfying trips by public transport impact its intended use in later life?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1245-1263, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1400-:d:144189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.