IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15272-d977236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Analysis of the Evaluation Methods of Extended Reality (XR) Experiences for Construction Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Salinas

    (School of Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile)

  • Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera

    (School of Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
    International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), C/Gran Capitán S/N UPC Campus Nord, Edifici C1, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
    School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Carrer de Jordi Girona, 1, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Javier Mora-Serrano

    (International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), C/Gran Capitán S/N UPC Campus Nord, Edifici C1, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
    School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Carrer de Jordi Girona, 1, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The construction industry has high accident rates. The sector is exploring various tools to improve safety management, training, and awareness to achieve zero accidents. This work focuses on extended reality (XR), which encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) technologies. Several authors have developed training experiences for construction safety in XR environments with positive conclusions about their effectiveness. However, there is no standardization regarding the evaluation methods used in the sector, and many experiences do not use any method. This lack is critical, as whenever the aim is to evaluate the degree of awareness of security issues, the implementation of evaluation systems is indispensable to make known the methods used in the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of the experiences and represent support for future research. This research identifies developments in XR experiences and analyzes the validation methods through a systematic review using the PRISMA methodology. It identifies two evaluation methods, objective and subjective, which are each broken down into four categories. The results show the types of evaluation, safety-related purposes, and safety application objectives used by the database classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Salinas & Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera & Javier Mora-Serrano, 2022. "Critical Analysis of the Evaluation Methods of Extended Reality (XR) Experiences for Construction Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15272-:d:977236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng Xu & Nan Zheng, 2020. "Incorporating Virtual Reality Technology in Safety Training Solution for Construction Site of Urban Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Hai Chien Pham & Nhu-Ngoc Dao & Jung-Ui Kim & Sungrae Cho & Chan-Sik Park, 2018. "Energy-Efficient Learning System Using Web-Based Panoramic Virtual Photoreality for Interactive Construction Safety Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas & Jorge Alcaide-Marzal & Rocio Poveda-Bautista, 2020. "Effects of Using Immersive Media on the Effectiveness of Training to Prevent Ergonomics Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Jieun Baek & Yosoon Choi, 2020. "Smart Glasses-Based Personnel Proximity Warning System for Improving Pedestrian Safety in Construction and Mining Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Rafael Sacks & Amotz Perlman & Ronen Barak, 2013. "Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1005-1017, September.
    6. Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera & Javier Mora-Serrano & Eugenio Oñate, 2021. "Factors Influencing Safety on Construction Projects (fSCPs): Types and Categories," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Ricardo Eiris & Masoud Gheisari & Behzad Esmaeili, 2018. "PARS: Using Augmented 360-Degree Panoramas of Reality for Construction Safety Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mojtaba Noghabaei & Arsalan Heydarian & Vahid Balali & Kevin Han, 2020. "Trend Analysis on Adoption of Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ricardo Eiris & Masoud Gheisari & Behzad Esmaeili, 2018. "PARS: Using Augmented 360-Degree Panoramas of Reality for Construction Safety Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    4. Adela Rueda Márquez de la Plata & Pablo Alejandro Cruz Franco & Jorge Alberto Ramos Sánchez, 2023. "Applications of Virtual and Augmented Reality Technology to Teaching and Research in Construction and Its Graphic Expression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Feng Guo & Junwu Wang & Denghui Liu & Yinghui Song, 2021. "Evolutionary Process of Promoting Construction Safety Education to Avoid Construction Safety Accidents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Xun Liu & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Exploring the Formation Mechanism of Unsafe Construction Behavior and Testing Efficient Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Bilal Manzoor & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2021. "Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Xiangcheng Meng & Huaiyuan Zhai & Alan H. S. Chan, 2019. "Development of Scales to Measure and Analyse the Relationship of Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behaviour of Construction Workers: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Paweł Strzałkowski & Paweł Bęś & Mariusz Szóstak & Mateusz Napiórkowski, 2024. "Application of Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in Mining and Civil Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Kieu-Trang Pham & Duc-Nghia Vu & Phuc Le Hieu Hong & Chansik Park, 2020. "4D-BIM-Based Workspace Planning for Temporary Safety Facilities in Construction SMEs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Hai Chien Pham & Nhu-Ngoc Dao & Jung-Ui Kim & Sungrae Cho & Chan-Sik Park, 2018. "Energy-Efficient Learning System Using Web-Based Panoramic Virtual Photoreality for Interactive Construction Safety Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Rawal Naresh, 2023. "Influence of Social and Economic Factors on Construction Project Performance in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Gondia, Ahmed & Moussa, Ahmed & Ezzeldin, Mohamed & El-Dakhakhni, Wael, 2023. "Machine learning-based construction site dynamic risk models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Hyeon-Ju Shin & Hee-Sung Cha, 2023. "Proposing a Quality Inspection Process Model Using Advanced Technologies for the Transition to Smart Building Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Mostafa Namian & Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli & Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati & Sharareh Kermanshachi, 2022. "Are Construction Managers from Mars and Workers from Venus? Exploring Differences in Construction Safety Perception of Two Key Field Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas & Jorge Alcaide-Marzal & Rocio Poveda-Bautista, 2020. "Effects of Using Immersive Media on the Effectiveness of Training to Prevent Ergonomics Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Mihić Matej & Vukomanović Mladen & Završki Ivica, 2019. "Review of previous applications of innovative information technologies in construction health and safety," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1952-1967, January.
    18. Zhenming Li & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Jianfang Zhu, 2021. "Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior, Sensation Seeking, and Risk Perception to Explain the Risky Driving Behavior of Truck Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Zezhou Wu & Kaijie Yang & Xiaofan Lai & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari, 2020. "A Scientometric Review of System Dynamics Applications in Construction Management Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Irfan & Pravin Sreenivasan & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani, 2022. "Health and Safety Improvement through Industrial Revolution 4.0: Malaysian Construction Industry Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15272-:d:977236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.