IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v189y2023ics004016252300032x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning-based construction site dynamic risk models

Author

Listed:
  • Gondia, Ahmed
  • Moussa, Ahmed
  • Ezzeldin, Mohamed
  • El-Dakhakhni, Wael

Abstract

In the last decade, injury statistics have not exhibited appreciable improvement within the construction industry, with current management strategies deployed reactively in response to typically safety lagging indicators (e.g., injury rates, lost workdays, and post-incident inspections). This situation suggests that proactive safety management approaches that rely on leading indicators for key decision-making need to be developed. To propel the third wave of construction safety management research, the current study aims at developing site risk models that generate predictions for safety risk leading indicators across different work zones and over the entire project lifecycles. Such leading indicators can be used to proactively anticipate worksite risks such that preventative measures are implemented in advance and/or adjusted in real-time as projects progress to dynamically monitor and enhance safety performance. The developed risk models are driven by ensemble machine learning algorithms trained using previous injury precursors and outcomes. The ensemble algorithms consider five base algorithms subsequently tuned and validated: naïve Bayes, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks. A demonstration application is also presented herein, where the ensemble algorithms are employed to develop a risk model that forecasts leading indicators of site-specific risk levels, including financial implications of potential injuries and the most likely affected body parts. The results demonstrate that, unlike currently available approaches, machine learning-based site risk models may be able to proactively and dynamically assess and subsequently boost the safety performance of construction projects. Such site risk models are expected to provide project managers with key information to proactively prevent worksite accidents, prioritize their resources, enhance project safety culture, and minimize injury-related costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gondia, Ahmed & Moussa, Ahmed & Ezzeldin, Mohamed & El-Dakhakhni, Wael, 2023. "Machine learning-based construction site dynamic risk models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:189:y:2023:i:c:s004016252300032x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252300032X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Peng Wu & Jun Wang & Hung-Lin Chi & Xiangyu Wang, 2018. "A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Rafael Sacks & Jennifer Whyte & Dana Swissa & Gabriel Raviv & Wei Zhou & Aviad Shapira, 2015. "Safety by design: dialogues between designers and builders using virtual reality," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 55-72, January.
    3. Rafael Sacks & Amotz Perlman & Ronen Barak, 2013. "Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1005-1017, September.
    4. Delen, Dursun & Cogdell, Douglas & Kasap, Nihat, 2012. "A comparative analysis of data mining methods in predicting NCAA bowl outcomes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 543-552.
    5. Rivas, T. & Paz, M. & Martín, J.E. & Matías, J.M. & García, J.F. & Taboada, J., 2011. "Explaining and predicting workplace accidents using data-mining techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 739-747.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihić Matej & Vukomanović Mladen & Završki Ivica, 2019. "Review of previous applications of innovative information technologies in construction health and safety," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1952-1967, January.
    2. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Yolanda Fuertes-Call鮠 & Bego uti鲲ez-Nieto & Beatriz Cuellar-Fernᮤez, 2014. "Path modelling to bankruptcy: causes and symptoms of the banking crisis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(31), pages 3798-3811, November.
    3. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Yu Zhao & Shaopeng Wei & Yu Guo & Qing Yang & Xingyan Chen & Qing Li & Fuzhen Zhuang & Ji Liu & Gang Kou, 2022. "Combining Intra-Risk and Contagion Risk for Enterprise Bankruptcy Prediction Using Graph Neural Networks," Papers 2202.03874, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    5. Jiang, Cuiqing & Lyu, Ximei & Yuan, Yufei & Wang, Zhao & Ding, Yong, 2022. "Mining semantic features in current reports for financial distress prediction: Empirical evidence from unlisted public firms in China," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1086-1099.
    6. Na Chen & Ming Zhao & Kun Gao & Jun Zhao, 2021. "Experimental Study on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors on Individual’s Emergency Escape Capability in Subway Fire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Xun Liu & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Exploring the Formation Mechanism of Unsafe Construction Behavior and Testing Efficient Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. María Escribano-Navas & German Gemar, 2021. "Gender and Bankruptcy: A Hotel Survival Econometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Praphula Kumar Jain & Waris Quamer & Rajendra Pamula, 2021. "Sports result prediction using data mining techniques in comparison with base line model," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 54-70, March.
    10. Shaoming Cheng & Sukumar Ganapati & Giri Narasimhan & Farzana Beente Yusuf, 2022. "A machine learning‐based analysis of 311 requests in the Miami‐Dade County," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1627-1645, December.
    11. Murielle G. Kluge & Steven Maltby & Angela Keynes & Eugene Nalivaiko & Darrell J. R. Evans & Frederick R. Walker, 2022. "Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys From Staff and Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    12. Banus Kam Leung Low & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Saad Alabdulkarim, 2019. "Construction Worker Risk-Taking Behavior Model with Individual and Organizational Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Mohamed Nour El-Din & João Poças Martins & Nuno M. M. Ramos & Pedro F. Pereira, 2024. "The Role of Blockchain-Secured Digital Twins in Promoting Smart Energy Performance-Based Contracts for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Koen W. de Bock, 2017. "The best of two worlds: Balancing model strength and comprehensibility in business failure prediction using spline-rule ensembles," Post-Print hal-01588059, HAL.
    15. Gerassis, S. & Albuquerque, M.T.D. & García, J.F. & Boente, C. & Giráldez, E. & Taboada, J. & Martín, J.E., 2019. "Understanding complex blasting operations: A structural equation model combining Bayesian networks and latent class clustering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 195-204.
    16. Tai, Chung-Ching & Lin, Hung-Wen & Chie, Bin-Tzong & Tung, Chen-Yuan, 2019. "Predicting the failures of prediction markets: A procedure of decision making using classification models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 297-312.
    17. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas & Jorge Alcaide-Marzal & Rocio Poveda-Bautista, 2020. "Effects of Using Immersive Media on the Effectiveness of Training to Prevent Ergonomics Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Sahand Azarby & Arthur Rice, 2022. "Understanding the Effects of Virtual Reality System Usage on Spatial Perception: The Potential Impacts of Immersive Virtual Reality on Spatial Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Mohamed Zul Fadhli Khairuddin & Puat Lu Hui & Khairunnisa Hasikin & Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak & Khin Wee Lai & Ahmad Shakir Mohd Saudi & Siti Salwa Ibrahim, 2022. "Occupational Injury Risk Mitigation: Machine Learning Approach and Feature Optimization for Smart Workplace Surveillance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Sami Ben Jabeur & Nicolae Stef & Pedro Carmona, 2023. "Bankruptcy Prediction using the XGBoost Algorithm and Variable Importance Feature Engineering," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 715-741, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:189:y:2023:i:c:s004016252300032x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.