IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2469-d1051403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Social and Economic Factors on Construction Project Performance in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Shabir Hussain Khahro

    (Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aftab Hameed Memon

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah 67450, Pakistan)

  • Nafees Ahmed Memon

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Zubair Ahmed Memon

    (Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rawal Naresh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

Abstract

The performance of a building project is a key determinant of its ultimate success. The failure of a construction project can be attributed to a variety of issues. Among these criteria, success and long-term sustainability have been identified as crucial. It has been established that social and economic considerations play a considerable effect in project completion. In Pakistani construction projects, however, there is a lack of a systematic framework for measuring the impact of social and economic elements on project success. It is, therefore, important to determine social and economic elements and their impact on project performance measures. Initially, 29 experts representing clients, consultants, and contractors were interviewed, and the factors relevant to Pakistan were shortlisted based on interviews. SPSS software was used to analyze the data, and the results were presented in tables and graphs. Safety, land value, health, employment, and education were the top five social factors, while the top five economic factors were productivity, employment, transportation, market access, and local market. As project performance indicators, time, customer satisfaction, cost, health and safety, and quality were identified. Based on these characteristics, a questionnaire was designed, and data from 154 valid replies were gathered and analyzed using the linear multiple regression approach. These equations have been constructed to examine the impact of social and economic factors on time, cost, health and safety, and quality. Using the findings of this research, we can better understand how social and economic aspects affect project outcomes and raise industry standards. These resources will be useful to the project manager in formulating a sound project management strategy and enhancing project results.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabir Hussain Khahro & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Rawal Naresh, 2023. "Influence of Social and Economic Factors on Construction Project Performance in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2469-:d:1051403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luqi Wang & Xiaolong Xue & Zebin Zhao & Zeyu Wang, 2018. "The Impacts of Transportation Infrastructure on Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Xiaer Xiahou & Yuchun Tang & Jingfeng Yuan & Tengyuan Chang & Ping Liu & Qiming Li, 2018. "Evaluating Social Performance of Construction Projects: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Randell, Heather, 2016. "The short-term impacts of development-induced displacement on wealth and subjective well-being in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 385-400.
    4. Coppens, Tom & Van Dooren, Wouter & Thijssen, Peter, 2018. "Public opposition and the neighborhood effect: How social interaction explains protest against a large infrastructure project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 633-640.
    5. Coppens, Tom & Van Dooren, Wouter & Thijssen, Peter, 2018. "Public opposition and the neighborhood effect: how social interaction explains protest against a large infrastructure project," SocArXiv abvus, Center for Open Science.
    6. Keith Jacobs & Tony Manzi, 2020. "Conceptualising ‘financialisation’: governance, organisational behaviour and social interaction in UK housing," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 184-202, April.
    7. Shahid Hussain & Fangwei Zhu & Zaigham Ali & Xiaohang Xu, 2017. "Rural Residents’ Perception of Construction Project Delays in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Mohammad Enamul Hoque, 2017. "Why Company Should Adopt Integrated Reporting?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 241-248.
    9. Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera & Javier Mora-Serrano & Eugenio Oñate, 2021. "Factors Influencing Safety on Construction Projects (fSCPs): Types and Categories," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aftab Hameed Memon & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Ahmed Mustafa, 2023. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance in the Construction Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Maarten Loopmans & Linde Smits & Anneleen Kenis, 2022. "Rethinking environmental justice: capability building, public knowledge and the struggle against traffic-related air pollution," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(3), pages 705-723, May.
    3. Zaiats, Tеtiana & Kraievska, Halyna & Diakonenko, Oksana, 2022. "Social capital of rural territorial communities in Ukraine: problems of strengthening and directions of their solution," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
    4. Chayaporn Ngampravatdee & Koorosh Gharehbaghi & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Kong Fah Tee & Kerry McManus, 2023. "Strategic Initiatives for Large Transport Infrastructure Planning: Reinforcing Sustainability in Urban Transportation through Better Stakeholder Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Fang Zhang & Hang Zhang & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Trust premium in the second-hand housing market: evidence from the negotiation rate," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Dhabia Alefari & Abeer Dar Saleh & Mahmoud Haggag, 2024. "The Impact of Light Rail Transit on Urban Development in Dubai, UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Cornelius O. Okorie & Christopha C. Arua & Felix M. Nwankwo, 2023. "Nigerian State and Rent-Dependent Economy: An Exposition of Vision 2020 Policy Strategies for Future Sustainable Development," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(3), pages 1330-1345, March.
    8. Zagoršeková, Natália & Čiefová, Michaela, 2019. "Development-Induced Displacement: The Case of Dam Construction in Slovakia and the Czech Republic," MPRA Paper 92464, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    10. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Madeleine Aguilar-Morocho & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. José-Francisco Vergara-Perucich, 2022. "Is There Financialization of Housing Prices? Empirical Evidence from Santiago de Chile," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Kathy Eljiz & David Greenfield & Lila Vrklevski & Alison Derrett & David Ryan, 2022. "Large scale healthcare facility redevelopment: A scoping review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 691-714, March.
    15. Rui Ren & Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bo Sun & Yicun Chen & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Milena Peršić & Lahorka Halmi, 2017. "Non-Financial Information And Integrated Reporting In The Hospitality Industry: Case Study Of Croatia," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 6(3), pages 95-109.
    17. Majid Askarifard & Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi & Mehran Sepehri & Ehsanollah Zeighami, 2021. "A robust multi-objective optimization model for project scheduling considering risk and sustainable development criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11494-11524, August.
    18. P. P. Braga, Daniel & Pokorny, Benno & Porro, Roberto & Vidal, Edson, 2023. "Good life in the Amazon? A critical reflection on the standard of living of cocoa and cattle-based smallholders in Pará, Brazil," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    19. Shahid Hussain & Zhu Fangwei & Ahmed Faisal Siddiqi & Zaigham Ali & Muhammad Salman Shabbir, 2018. "Structural Equation Model for Evaluating Factors Affecting Quality of Social Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    20. Ivan Turok & Andreas Scheba & Justin Visagie, 2022. "Can social housing help to integrate divided cities? [Segregation and the urban rich; enclaves, networks and mobilities]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 93-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2469-:d:1051403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.