IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12252-d684974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Evolution of User Emotion and Opinion Leaders’ Information Dissemination Behavior in the Knowledge Q&A Community during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Xu

    (School of Economic Information Engineering, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Zhigang Li

    (School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Rui Wang

    (School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Li Zhao

    (School of Economic Information Engineering, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Since its emergence in 2019, COVID-19 has quickly triggered widespread public discussion on social media. From 26 February 2020 to 26 September 2020, this study collected data on COVID-19-related posts in the knowledge Q&A community, identified 220 opinion leaders of this community, and used social network analysis and sentiment analysis to analyze the information exchange behavior and emotional evolution of the opinion leaders during COVID-19. The results show that the COVID-19 topic community could be divided into seven main categories. The information dissemination of opinion leader information dissemination network had low efficiency, multiple paths, and a high degree of control. In addition, the emotional evolution of users showed obvious phased characteristics. User emotion changed from initially strong negative to strong positive over the course of the pandemic and eventually tended to be objective and neutral as time passed and the event stabilized.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Xu & Zhigang Li & Rui Wang & Li Zhao, 2021. "Analysis of the Evolution of User Emotion and Opinion Leaders’ Information Dissemination Behavior in the Knowledge Q&A Community during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12252-:d:684974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanlan Mei & Yan Tu & Kefan Xie & Yicheng Ye & Wenjing Shen, 2019. "Internet Public Opinion Risk Grading under Emergency Event Based on AHPSort II-DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Zhigang Li & Xu Xu, 2020. "Analysis of Network Structure and Doctor Behaviors in E-Health Communities from a Social-Capital Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Karen File & Thomas Valente & Mary-Louise McLaws, 2018. "Hygiene and Health: Who Do Mothers in Vanuatu Communicate with about Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Catherine A. Johnson, 2007. "Social capital and the search for information: Examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(6), pages 883-894, April.
    5. Salvatore Pirri & Valentina Lorenzoni & Gianni Andreozzi & Marta Mosca & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2020. "Topic Modeling and User Network Analysis on Twitter during World Lupus Awareness Day," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Noah Grodzinski & Ben Grodzinski & Benjamin M Davies, 2021. "Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Tam Thien Vo & Xinning Xiao & Shuk Ying Ho, 2019. "How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Influence Word of Mouth on Twitter? Evidence from the Airline Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 525-542, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heng Tang & Hanwei Xu & Xiaoping Rui & Xuebiao Heng & Ying Song, 2022. "The Identification and Analysis of the Centers of Geographical Public Opinions in Flood Disasters Based on Improved Naïve Bayes Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becken, Susanne & Stantic, Bela & Chen, Jinyan & Connolly, Rod M., 2022. "Twitter conversations reveal issue salience of aviation in the broader context of climate change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Arroyos-Calvera, Danae & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2022. "Reputation as Insurance: How Reputation Moderates Public Backlash Following a Company's Decision to Profiteer," IZA Discussion Papers 15256, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Mafael, Alexander & Ulqinaku, Aulona & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2023. "Service failures in times of crisis: An analysis of eWOM emotionality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Siva K. Balasubramanian & Yiwei Fang & Zihao Yang, 2021. "Twitter Presence and Experience Improve Corporate Social Responsibility Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 737-757, November.
    5. Zhimin Zhou & Yucheng Wang & Yaqin Zheng & Shixiong Liu, 2023. "Effects of brand community social responsibility: roles of collective self-esteem and altruism," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 347-366, July.
    6. Gregory D. Saxton & Charlotte Ren & Chao Guo, 2021. "Responding to Diffused Stakeholders on Social Media: Connective Power and Firm Reactions to CSR-Related Twitter Messages," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 229-252, August.
    7. Zhang, Jietao & Tu, Yan & Liu, Jun & Liu, Liyi & Li, Zongmin, 2022. "Regional public transportation safety risk grading assessment under time dimension: A case study of Chinese mainland," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-354.
    8. Patrick Hartmann & Paula Fernández & Vanessa Apaolaza & Martin Eisend & Clare D’Souza, 2021. "Explaining Viral CSR Message Propagation in Social Media: The Role of Normative Influences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 365-385, October.
    9. Imran Khan & Mobin Fatma, 2023. "CSR Influence on Brand Image and Consumer Word of Mouth: Mediating Role of Brand Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Wei Jiang & Liwen Wang & Kevin Zhou, 2022. "Green Practices and Customer Evaluations of the Service Experience: The Moderating Roles of External Environmental Factors and Firm Characteristics," Post-Print hal-04015637, HAL.
    11. Rajesh Sharma, 2024. "Consumer perceived corporate social responsibility and electronic word of mouth in social media: mediating role of consumer–company identification and moderating role of user-generated content," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 523-535, June.
    12. Rui Ma & Jacob Cherian & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Li Hou & Susana Álvarez-Otero, 2021. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility on Digital Platforms, Electronic Word-of-Mouth, and Consumer-Company Identification: An Application of Social Identity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Katharina Baum & Annika Baumann & Katharina Batzel, 2024. "Investigating Innovation Diffusion in Gender-Specific Medicine: Insights from Social Network Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 335-355, June.
    14. Jingfang Liu & Yafei Liu, 2022. "Exploring the User Interaction Network in an Anxiety Disorder Online Community: An Exponential Random Graph Model with Topical and Emotional Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Ibrahim Alnawas & Nabil Ghantous & Jane Hemsley-Brown, 2023. "Can CSR foster brand defense? A moderated-mediation model of the role of brand passion," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(3), pages 190-206, May.
    16. Chao-Chan Wu & Fei-Chun Cheng & Dong-Yu Sheh, 2023. "Exploring the factors affecting the implementation of corporate social responsibility from a strategic perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Jung, Hyukjin & Bae, Joonheui & Kim, Hanku, 2022. "The effect of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Why company size matters based on consumers’ need for self-expression," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 146-154.
    18. Egle Jakunskiene & Egle Kazlauskiene, 2022. "The Evaluation of Business Tools for Encouraging Social Responsibility in Older Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Shi, Lingyuan & Yang, Xin & Chang, Ximing & Wu, Jianjun & Sun, Huijun, 2023. "An improved density peaks clustering algorithm based on k nearest neighbors and turning point for evaluating the severity of railway accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Rolf Wynn & Elia Gabarron & Jan-Are K. Johnsen & Vicente Traver, 2020. "Special Issue on E-Health Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-6, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12252-:d:684974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.