IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4440-d258344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internet Public Opinion Risk Grading under Emergency Event Based on AHPSort II-DEMATEL

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlan Mei

    (School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
    School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China)

  • Yan Tu

    (School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Kefan Xie

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yicheng Ye

    (School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
    Industrial Safety Engineering Technology Research Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430081, China)

  • Wenjing Shen

    (LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

Abstract

The internet often serves as a communication platform for users to freely express opinions. However, as it supports the quick and wide spread of public opinions, it often results in great uncertainty and is very difficult to control. As a result, evaluating the risk levels of internet public opinion becomes very challenging. The safety of internet public opinion affects the sustainability and stability of society. In this paper, a novel conceptual model of internet public opinion governance is proposed. The model can be used to grade risk levels by combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process Sort II (AHPSort II) and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) under a fuzzy environment with triangular fuzzy sets. A numerical example is provided to verify the efficiency of the proposed method, and some managerial implications are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlan Mei & Yan Tu & Kefan Xie & Yicheng Ye & Wenjing Shen, 2019. "Internet Public Opinion Risk Grading under Emergency Event Based on AHPSort II-DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4440-:d:258344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher D. Wirz & Michael A. Xenos & Dominique Brossard & Dietram Scheufele & Jennifer H. Chung & Luisa Massarani, 2018. "Rethinking Social Amplification of Risk: Social Media and Zika in Three Languages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2599-2624, December.
    2. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    3. Huo, Liang’an & Ma, Chenyang, 2017. "The interaction evolution model of mass incidents with delay in a social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 484(C), pages 440-452.
    4. Min-hua Huang & Taehee Whang & Lei Xuchuan, 2017. "The Internet, Social Capital, and Civic Engagement in Asia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 559-578, June.
    5. Wu, Hsin-Hung & Chang, Shih-Yu, 2015. "A case study of using DEMATEL method to identify critical factors in green supply chain management," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 394-403.
    6. Yi Zhang & Jiuping Xu & Yue Wu, 2018. "A fuzzy rumor spreading model based on transmission capacity," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(02), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Lian, Ying & Dong, Xuefan & Liu, Yijun, 2017. "Topological evolution of the internet public opinion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 486(C), pages 567-578.
    8. Haihong Yuan & Xiaolu Gao & Wei Qi, 2019. "Fine-Scale Spatiotemporal Analysis of Population Vulnerability to Earthquake Disasters: Theoretical Models and Application to Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Liu, Qiming & Li, Tao & Sun, Meici, 2017. "The analysis of an SEIR rumor propagation model on heterogeneous network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 372-380.
    10. Jiuping Xu & Yi Zhang, 2015. "Event ambiguity fuels the effective spread of rumors," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(03), pages 1-16.
    11. Roger E. Kasperson & Ortwin Renn & Paul Slovic & Halina S. Brown & Jacque Emel & Robert Goble & Jeanne X. Kasperson & Samuel Ratick, 1988. "The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 177-187, June.
    12. Yi Zhang & Jiuping Xu, 2015. "A Rumor Spreading Model considering the Cumulative Effects of Memory," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jijian Lu & Pan Tuo & Junyan Pan & Meimei Zhou & Mohan Zhang & Shaohua Hu, 2023. "Shadow Education in China and Its Diversified Normative Governance Mechanism: Double Reduction Policy and Internet Public Opinion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Shi, Lingyuan & Yang, Xin & Chang, Ximing & Wu, Jianjun & Sun, Huijun, 2023. "An improved density peaks clustering algorithm based on k nearest neighbors and turning point for evaluating the severity of railway accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Xu Xu & Zhigang Li & Rui Wang & Li Zhao, 2021. "Analysis of the Evolution of User Emotion and Opinion Leaders’ Information Dissemination Behavior in the Knowledge Q&A Community during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Zhang, Jietao & Tu, Yan & Liu, Jun & Liu, Liyi & Li, Zongmin, 2022. "Regional public transportation safety risk grading assessment under time dimension: A case study of Chinese mainland," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-354.
    5. Liu, Liyi & Tu, Yan & Zhou, Xiaoyang, 2022. "How local outbreak of COVID-19 affect the risk of internet public opinion: A Chinese social media case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huo, Liang’an & Cheng, Yingying, 2019. "Dynamical analysis of a IWSR rumor spreading model with considering the self-growth mechanism and indiscernible degree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    2. Lee, Edmund W.J. & Bao, Huanyu & Wang, Yixi & Lim, Yi Torng, 2023. "From pandemic to Plandemic: Examining the amplification and attenuation of COVID-19 misinformation on social media," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Chen, Long & Huang, Jiahui & Jing, Peng & Wang, Bichen & Yu, Xiaozhou & Zha, Ye & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "Changing or unchanging Chinese attitudes toward ride-hailing? A social media analytics perspective from 2018 to 2021," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Dominic Balog‐Way & Katherine McComas & John Besley, 2020. "The Evolving Field of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2240-2262, November.
    5. Ali Unlu & Sophie Truong & Nitin Sawhney & Jonas Sivelä & Tuukka Tammi, 2024. "Long-term assessment of social amplification of risk during COVID-19: challenges to public health agencies amid misinformation and vaccine stance," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 809-836, April.
    6. Dong, Xuefan & Lian, Ying, 2021. "A review of social media-based public opinion analyses: Challenges and recommendations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Roxanne E. Lewis & Michael G. Tyshenko, 2009. "The Impact of Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk and the Public Reaction to Mad Cow Disease in Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 714-728, May.
    8. Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli & Francesco De Pascale & Giovanni Gull?, 2018. "La comunicazione del rischio e la percezione pubblica dei disastri: il caso studio della frana di Maierato (Calabria, Italia)," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 9-29.
    9. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    10. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Hung‐Chih Hung & Tzu‐Wen Wang, 2011. "Determinants and Mapping of Collective Perceptions of Technological Risk: The Case of the Second Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 668-683, April.
    12. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    13. Hosni, Adil Imad Eddine & Li, Kan & Ahmad, Sadique, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of online social networks addiction on the propagation of rumors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    14. Robert D. Jagiello & Thomas T. Hills, 2018. "Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2193-2207, October.
    15. Emmanuel Songsore & Michael Buzzelli, 2016. "Ontario’s Experience of Wind Energy Development as Seen through the Lens of Human Health and Environmental Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Sara E. Kuhar & Kate Nierenberg & Barbara Kirkpatrick & Graham A. Tobin, 2009. "Public Perceptions of Florida Red Tide Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7), pages 963-969, July.
    17. Kun Chen & Gang Kou & J. Michael Tarn & Yan Song, 2015. "Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 155-175, December.
    18. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    19. Li Zhao & Shumin Liu & Haiying Gu & David Ahlstrom, 2023. "Risk Amplification, Risk Preference and Acceptance of Transgenic Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2022. "Sports competitions and the Break-Even rule," Working Papers 22.13, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4440-:d:258344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.