IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v126y2022icp343-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional public transportation safety risk grading assessment under time dimension: A case study of Chinese mainland

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jietao
  • Tu, Yan
  • Liu, Jun
  • Liu, Liyi
  • Li, Zongmin

Abstract

Traffic risk hinders the development of human society. Due to the influence of weather and climate, the traffic risks vary in different time periods. This paper innovatively reconstructs the criterion system for evaluating regional traffic safety risk from a time series perspective. On the basis of the novel criterion system, this paper proposes a monthly dimension regional public traffic safety risk grading model with Analytic Hierarchy Process Sort II (AHPSort II) and Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) (i.e., AHPSort II-CRITIC method), in which, AHPSort II is used to obtain the traffic safety risk levels of different regions, and the CRITIC is used to determine the weight vector of the criteria system. The proposed method is applied to evaluate the regional traffic safety risk levels of 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in the Chinese mainland and some cities in Hubei province in the whole year of 2019. The results of this paper show that the traffic safety risk levels are high in June, July, and August, and the performances of other months are relatively more optimistic. Finally, this paper puts forward some transport policy implications, which provide a suitable basis for policy formulation to reduce regional traffic safety risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jietao & Tu, Yan & Liu, Jun & Liu, Liyi & Li, Zongmin, 2022. "Regional public transportation safety risk grading assessment under time dimension: A case study of Chinese mainland," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-354.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:343-354
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22002141
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langemeyer, Johannes & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Haase, Dagmar & Scheuer, Sebastian & Elmqvist, Thomas, 2016. "Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 45-56.
    2. Yanlan Mei & Yan Tu & Kefan Xie & Yicheng Ye & Wenjing Shen, 2019. "Internet Public Opinion Risk Grading under Emergency Event Based on AHPSort II-DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Bardal, Kjersti Granås & Jørgensen, Finn, 2017. "Valuing the risk and social costs of road traffic accidents – Seasonal variation and the significance of delay costs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 10-19.
    4. Fancello, Gianfranco & Carta, Michele & Fadda, Paolo, 2019. "Road intersections ranking for road safety improvement: Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 188-196.
    5. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Luo, Qingyu & Xiao, Guangnian, 2016. "Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 156-167.
    6. Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Luis Martínez, 2020. "Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process–based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(6), pages 928-947, June.
    7. Alessio Ishizaka & Cristina López, 2019. "Cost-benefit AHPSort for performance analysis of offshore providers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(13), pages 4261-4277, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Zhongxiang & Gao, Ya & Zhu, Dianchen & Chan, Ho-Yin & Zhao, Mingming & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Impact of risk perception and trust in autonomous vehicles on pedestrian crossing decision: Navigating the social-technological intersection with the ICLV model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-86.
    2. Zheng, Qikang & Sharmeen, Fariya & Xu, Chengcheng & Liu, Pan, 2024. "Assessing regional road traffic safety in Sweden through dynamic panel data analysis: Influence of the planned innovative policies and the unplanned COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu-Hui Li & Lin Huang & Qiang Li & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pythagorean Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method under Large Group Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Aqing Jiang & Zihao Song & Xuancang Wang & Jing Zhao & Junru Ren, 2023. "Properties of Concrete Reinforced with a Basalt Fiber Microwave-Absorbing Shielding Layer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Vijay Pereira & Umesh Bamel, 2023. "Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 635-651, July.
    4. Yourong Guo, 2024. "Z-Number TODIM-EDAS Decision-Making Framework for Cultural Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation in the Yellow River Basin," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Dragan Vujičić & Nevena Vasiljević & Boris Radić & Andreja Tutundžić & Nevenka Galečić & Dejan Skočajić & Mirjana Ocokoljić, 2024. "Conceptualisation of the Regulatory Framework of Green Infrastructure for Urban Development: Identifying Barriers and Drivers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Guang Han & Zehao Wei & Huawei Zheng & Liqun Zhu, 2024. "Evaluation Index System of Rural Ecological Revitalization in China: A National Empirical Study Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Klimanova, O.A. & Bukvareva, E.N. & Yu, Kolbowsky E. & Illarionova, O.A., 2023. "Assessing ecosystem services in Russia: Case studies from four municipal districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Martin, D.M. & Mazzotta, M., 2018. "Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 13-22.
    9. Jahun Koo & Gyeongjae Lee & Sujae Kim & Sangho Choo, 2024. "Evaluation of Public Transportation System through Social Network Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Pelenc, Jérôme & Etxano, Iker, 2021. "Capabilities, Ecosystem Services, and Strong Sustainability through SMCE: The Case of Haren (Belgium)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Li, Jinpei, 2020. "Does technical efficiency play a mediating role between bus facility scale and ridership attraction? Evidence from bus practices in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 77-96.
    12. Castro, Kássia Batista de & Roig, Henrique Llacer & Neumann, Marina Rolim Bilich & Rossi, Maria Silvia & Seraphim, Ana Paula Albuquerque Campos Castalonga & Réquia, Weeberb João & Costa, Alexandre Bar, 2019. "New perspectives in land use mapping based on urban morphology: A case study of the Federal District, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Potschin-Young, M. & Haines-Young, R. & Görg, C. & Heink, U. & Jax, K. & Schleyer, C., 2018. "Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 428-440.
    14. Jindong Qin & Yingying Liang & Luis Martinez & Alessio Ishizaka & Witold Pedrycz, 2023. "ORESTE-SORT: a novel multiple criteria sorting method for sorting port group competitiveness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 875-909, June.
    15. Ni, Anning & Zhang, Chunqin & Hu, Yuting & Lu, Weite & Li, Hongwei, 2020. "Influence mechanism of the corporate image on passenger satisfaction with public transport in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 54-65.
    16. Stefano Salata & Koray Velibeyoğlu & Alper Baba & Nicel Saygın & Virginia Thompson Couch & Taygun Uzelli, 2022. "Adapting Cities to Pluvial Flooding: The Case of Izmir (Türkiye)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Lavorel, Sandra & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Grigulis, Karl & Zawada, Mégane & Byczek, Coline, 2020. "Interactions between outdoor recreation and iconic terrestrial vertebrates in two French alpine national parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    18. Grima, Nelson & Singh, Simron J. & Smetschka, Barbara, 2018. "Improving payments for ecosystem services (PES) outcomes through the use of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and the software OPTamos," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 47-55.
    19. Linrun Qiu & Yuxiang Dong & Hai Liu, 2022. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Planning Practice: Situation, Challenges and Inspirations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Stefano Salata & Gabriele Garnero & Carlo Alberto Barbieri & Carolina Giaimo, 2017. "The Integration of Ecosystem Services in Planning: An Evaluation of the Nutrient Retention Model Using InVEST Software," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:343-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.