IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3370-d266493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Demand-Control-Support Model as Related to Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Working Women and Men

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Larsson

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden
    Sophiahemmet University, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Örjan Ekblom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Lena V. Kallings

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Maria Ekblom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden
    The Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Victoria Blom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden
    The Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

A physically active lifestyle incurs health benefits and physically active individuals show reduced reactivity to psychosocial stressors. However, the findings are inconclusive and are based on self-reported physical activity and sedentary time. The present study aimed at studying the associations between psychological stressors (job demand, control, support, JD-C-S) and objectively measured physical activity (PA) on various intensities from sedentary (SED) to vigorous physical activity. The participants were 314 employees from a cross-sectional study. PA data were collected with the accelerometer ActiGraph GT3X (Pensacola, FL, USA), SED data with the inclinometer activPAL (PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, Scotland, UK), and psychosocial stressors with a web questionnaire. Results showed that vigorous-intensity PA was negatively associated with demand (β −0.15, p < 0.05), even when adjusted for the covariates. SED was negatively associated to support (β −0.13, p < 0.05). Stress significantly moderated relations between support and sedentary time (β −0.12, p < 0.05). Moderate PA (MVPA) was negatively associated with demand, but only when controlling for overtime (β −0.13, p < 0.05). MVPA was also negatively associated with control (β −0.15, p < 0.05) but not when work engagement was included in the model. Being more physically active and spending less time sedentary may help to handle job situations with high demand and low support.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Larsson & Örjan Ekblom & Lena V. Kallings & Maria Ekblom & Victoria Blom, 2019. "Job Demand-Control-Support Model as Related to Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Working Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3370-:d:266493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carla F. J. Nooijen & Lena V. Kallings & Victoria Blom & Örjan Ekblom & Yvonne Forsell & Maria M. Ekblom, 2018. "Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Piia Seppälä & Saija Mauno & Taru Feldt & Jari Hakanen & Ulla Kinnunen & Asko Tolvanen & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2009. "The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 459-481, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Wang & Victoria Blom & Carla F. J. Nooijen & Lena V. Kallings & Örjan Ekblom & Maria M. Ekblom, 2021. "The Role of Executive Function in the Effectiveness of Multi-Component Interventions Targeting Physical Activity Behavior in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jussi Tanskanen & Liisa Mäkelä & Riitta Viitala, 2019. "Linking Managerial Coaching and Leader–Member Exchange on Work Engagement and Performance," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1217-1240, April.
    2. Yuxi Tang & Weiguang He, 2022. "Emotion Regulation and Psychological Capital of Chinese University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Serial Mediation Effect of Learning Satisfaction and Learning Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Naomi Grosze Nipper & Jessica van Wingerden & Rob Poell, 2018. "The Motivational Potential of Human Resource Development: Relationships Between Perceived Opportunities for Professional Development, Job Crafting and Work Engagement," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 27-42, June.
    4. Piia Seppälä & Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Konrad Kulikowski & Magdalena Madej, 2014. "Zaangazowanie w prace – problemy z pomiarem (The measurement of work engagement – problems and issues)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 12(45), pages 99-112.
    6. Jermaine M. Ravalier, 2022. "Co-Design, Delivery, and Evaluation of Wellbeing Initiatives for NHS Staff: The HOW (Healthier Outcomes at Work) NHS Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shantz, Amanda & Alfes, Kerstin & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 48156, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Diane Arijs & Anneleen Michiels, 2021. "Mental Health in Family Businesses and Business Families: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Bradley MacDonald & Ann-Marie Gibson & Xanne Janssen & Alison Kirk, 2020. "A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Digital Intervention to Improve Sedentary Behaviour Across Multiple Workplace Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Mari Huhtala & Taru Feldt & Anna-Maija Lämsä & Saija Mauno & Ulla Kinnunen, 2011. "Does the Ethical Culture of Organisations Promote Managers’ Occupational Well-Being? Investigating Indirect Links via Ethical Strain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 231-247, June.
    11. Romulo Moraes & Aridelmo José Teixeira, 2020. "Managers, Engagement and Political Behaviors: A Nonlinear Relationship," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(3), pages 218-231.
    12. Umair Ahmed & Abdul Halim Abdul Majid & Lazim Mohd Zin, 2016. "Construct Validation of 17-item Utrecht University Work Engagement Scale Amongst the White Collar employees of Malaysian Universities," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(5), pages 306-312, May.
    13. Abu Shams Mohammad Mahmudul Hoque & Zainudin Bin Awang & Benazir Ahmed Siddiqui & Malam Salihu Sabiu, 2018. "Role of Employee Engagement on Compensation System and Employee Performance Relationship among Telecommunication Service Providers in Bangladesh," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 1937-1937, December.
    14. Piia Seppälä & Lotta K. Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," Post-Print hal-03188191, HAL.
    15. Saija Mauno & Riikka Hirvonen & Noona Kiuru, 2018. "Children’s Life Satisfaction: The Roles of Mothers’ Work Engagement and Recovery from Work," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1373-1393, June.
    16. Ali Falah Dalain, 2023. "Nurturing Employee Engagement at Workplace and Organizational Innovation in Time of Crisis With Moderating Effect of Servant Leadership," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    17. Amanda H. Wilkerson & Nuha Abutalib & Ny’Nika T. McFadden & Shristi Bhochhibhoya & Adriana Dragicevic & Bushra R. Salous & Vinayak K. Nahar, 2023. "A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, July.
    18. AHMED Umair & SHAH Saeed Abbas & QURESHI Muhammad Asif & SHAH Muzafar Hussain & KHUWAJA Faiz Muhammad, 2018. "Nurturing Innovation Performance Through Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderation Of Employee Engagement," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 20-30, August.
    19. Emerald G. Heiland & Örjan Ekblom & Emil Bojsen-Møller & Lisa-Marie Larisch & Victoria Blom & Maria M. Ekblom, 2021. "Bi-Directional, Day-to-Day Associations between Objectively-Measured Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep among Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Benedetto Torrisi & Giuseppe Pernagallo, 2022. "The Relationship Between Academic Well-Being and Territoriality in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 413-431, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3370-:d:266493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.