IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p792-d141850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Carla F. J. Nooijen

    (The Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
    The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Lena V. Kallings

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Victoria Blom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden
    The Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Örjan Ekblom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Yvonne Forsell

    (The Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
    Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm Health Care District, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Maria M. Ekblom

    (The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden
    The Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Qualitative studies identified barriers and facilitators associated with work-related sedentary behaviour. The objective of this study was to determine common perceived barriers and facilitators among office workers, assess subgroup differences, and describe sedentary behaviour. From two Swedish companies, 547 office workers (41 years (IQR = 35–48), 65% women, 66% highly educated) completed questionnaires on perceived barriers and facilitators, for which subgroup differences in age, gender, education, and workplace sedentary behaviour were assessed. Sedentary behaviour was measured using inclinometers ( n = 311). The most frequently reported barrier was sitting is a habit (67%), which was reported more among women than men (Χ 2 = 5.14, p = 0.03) and more among highly sedentary office workers (Χ 2 = 9.26, p < 0.01). The two other most reported barriers were that standing is uncomfortable (29%) and standing is tiring (24%). Facilitators with the most support were the introduction of either standing- or walking-meetings (respectively 33% and 29%) and more possibilities or reminders for breaks (31%). The proportion spent sedentary was 64% at the workplace, 61% on working days, and 57% on non-working days. This study provides a detailed understanding of office workers’ ideas about sitting and means to reduce sitting. We advise to include the supported facilitators and individualized support in interventions to work towards more effective strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla F. J. Nooijen & Lena V. Kallings & Victoria Blom & Örjan Ekblom & Yvonne Forsell & Maria M. Ekblom, 2018. "Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:792-:d:141850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda H. Wilkerson & Nuha Abutalib & Ny’Nika T. McFadden & Shristi Bhochhibhoya & Adriana Dragicevic & Bushra R. Salous & Vinayak K. Nahar, 2023. "A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. M. Lauren Voss & J. Paige Pope & Jennifer L. Copeland, 2020. "Reducing Sedentary Time among Older Adults in Assisted Living: Perceptions, Barriers, and Motivators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Emerald G. Heiland & Örjan Ekblom & Emil Bojsen-Møller & Lisa-Marie Larisch & Victoria Blom & Maria M. Ekblom, 2021. "Bi-Directional, Day-to-Day Associations between Objectively-Measured Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep among Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Viktoria Wahlström & David Olsson & Fredrik Öhberg & Tommy Olsson & Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm, 2020. "Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers—An Exploratory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Samson O. Ojo & Daniel P. Bailey & David J. Hewson & Angel M. Chater, 2019. "Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Viktoria Wahlström & Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund & Mette Harder & Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm & Therese Eskilsson, 2019. "Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Emma Drake & Maria M. Ekblom & Örjan Ekblom & Lena V. Kallings & Victoria Blom, 2020. "Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Device-Measured Sedentary Behaviour are Associated with Sickness Absence in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    8. Kristina Larsson & Örjan Ekblom & Lena V. Kallings & Maria Ekblom & Victoria Blom, 2019. "Job Demand-Control-Support Model as Related to Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Working Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-10, September.
    9. Rui Wang & Victoria Blom & Carla F. J. Nooijen & Lena V. Kallings & Örjan Ekblom & Maria M. Ekblom, 2021. "The Role of Executive Function in the Effectiveness of Multi-Component Interventions Targeting Physical Activity Behavior in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:792-:d:141850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.