IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03188191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Piia Seppälä

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Lotta K. Harju
  • Jari J. Hakanen

Abstract

Job crafting describes proactive employee behaviors to improve the design of their work and working conditions, and to adapt their job to better suit their abilities and needs. During organizational changes, employees may use job crafting to adjust to the changes in their work and protect their well-being and motivation, i.e., work engagement. However, research shows that although the effects of job crafting strategies that expand the design of work (approach job crafting) have been positive on work engagement, the effects of job crafting strategies that diminish the scope of work (avoidance job crafting) have often been negative. This study investigated the effects of the interactions between different job crafting strategies on work engagement, an aspect that has not thus far been studied. Specifically, we hypothesized that avoidance job crafting is not harmful for work engagement when it is conducted in combination with approach job crafting, particularly during times of organizational change. A two-wave, 18-month follow-up study was conducted among public sector workers who either experienced (n = 479) or did not experience (n = 412) changes in their work. Latent moderated structural equation modeling revealed that avoidance job crafting did not reduce work engagement when combined with approach job crafting behaviors. Moreover, job crafting best benefited work engagement when it was combined with these opposing strategies. However, job crafting was beneficial for work engagement only among employees who were affected by organizational changes, that is, among employees whose job design had changed. Practically, organizations implementing changes could encourage proactive job redesign approaches among their employees—particularly both approach and avoidance types of job crafting strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Piia Seppälä & Lotta K. Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," Post-Print hal-03188191, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03188191
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03188191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03188191/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2016. "Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? : A three-year cross-lagged panel study," Post-Print hal-02312426, HAL.
    2. Oldham, Greg R. & Fried, Yitzhak, 2016. "Job design research and theory: Past, present and future," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 20-35.
    3. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    4. Andreas Klein & Helfried Moosbrugger, 2000. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 457-474, December.
    5. Jean-Pierre Neveu & Stevan E. Hobfoll & Jonathon Halbesleben & M Westman, 2018. "Conservation of resources in the organizational context : the reality of resources and their consequences," Post-Print hal-02472360, HAL.
    6. Piia Seppälä & Saija Mauno & Taru Feldt & Jari Hakanen & Ulla Kinnunen & Asko Tolvanen & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2009. "The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 459-481, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weiwei Shang, 2022. "The Effects of Job Crafting on Job Performance among Ideological and Political Education Teachers: The Mediating Role of Work Meaning and Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piia Seppälä & Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Francoise Contreras & Juan C. Espinosa & Gustavo A. Esguerra, 2020. "Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    3. Wei-Li Wu & Yi-Chih Lee, 2020. "Do Work Engagement and Transformational Leadership Facilitate Knowledge Sharing? A Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Shantz, Amanda & Alfes, Kerstin & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 48156, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Valerio Ghezzi & Tahira M. Probst & Laura Petitta & Valeria Ciampa & Matteo Ronchetti & Cristina Di Tecco & Sergio Iavicoli & Claudio Barbaranelli, 2020. "The Interplay among Age and Employment Status on the Perceptions of Psychosocial Risk Factors at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Abu Shams Mohammad Mahmudul Hoque & Zainudin Bin Awang & Benazir Ahmed Siddiqui & Malam Salihu Sabiu, 2018. "Role of Employee Engagement on Compensation System and Employee Performance Relationship among Telecommunication Service Providers in Bangladesh," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 1937-1937, December.
    7. AHMED Umair & SHAH Saeed Abbas & QURESHI Muhammad Asif & SHAH Muzafar Hussain & KHUWAJA Faiz Muhammad, 2018. "Nurturing Innovation Performance Through Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderation Of Employee Engagement," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 20-30, August.
    8. Haixiao Chen & Ho Kwong Kwan & Jie Xin, 2022. "Is behaving unethically for organizations a mixed blessing? A dual-pathway model for the work-to-family spillover effects of unethical pro-organizational behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1535-1560, December.
    9. Nikita Bosa & Trevor Ncamiso Mtetwa, 2023. "An investigation into the job Design of construction managers and its impact on employee engagement," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 40(1), pages 288-298, February.
    10. Gabriel, Kelly P. & Aguinis, Herman, 2022. "How to prevent and combat employee burnout and create healthier workplaces during crises and beyond," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 183-192.
    11. Luu, Trong Tuan & Rowley, Chris & Vo, Thanh Thao, 2019. "Addressing employee diversity to foster their work engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 303-315.
    12. Pujol-Cols, Lucas J., 2017. "Riesgos psicosociales y satisfacción laboral en docentes de una universidad pública argentina: explorando el rol del work engagement," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2867, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    13. Konrad Kulikowski & Magdalena Madej, 2014. "Zaangazowanie w prace – problemy z pomiarem (The measurement of work engagement – problems and issues)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 12(45), pages 99-112.
    14. Huatian Wang & Peikai Li & Shi Chen, 2020. "The Impact of Social Factors on Job Crafting: A Meta-Analysis and Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Romulo Moraes & Aridelmo José Teixeira, 2020. "Managers, Engagement and Political Behaviors: A Nonlinear Relationship," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(3), pages 218-231.
    16. Rasha S. Hassan & Hala M. G. Amin & Hebatallah Ghoneim, 2024. "Decent work and innovative work behavior of academic staff in higher education institutions: the mediating role of work engagement and job self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Adedapo Oluwaseyi Ojo & Olawole Fawehinmi & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza, 2021. "Examining the Predictors of Resilience and Work Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Romulo Matos Moraes & Aridelmo José Campanharo Teixeira, 2017. "When Engagement Meets Politics: Analysis of a Brazilian Public Institution," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 495-508, December.
    19. Luxmi Malodia & Indu Goyal, 2023. "Psychological Process that Links Authentic Leadership with Followers’ Creative Behaviour," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, June.
    20. Sung-Hoon Ko & Yongjun Choi & Seung-Yoon Rhee & Tae Won Moon, 2018. "Social Capital and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Double-Mediation of Emotional Regulation and Job Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03188191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.