IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i10p1765-d232337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of Miners’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruipeng Tong

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunyun Yang

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaofei Ma

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanwei Zhang

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shian Li

    (Safety Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China)

  • Hongqing Yang

    (Safety Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China)

Abstract

China’s coal mine production situation is grim and various types of accidents occur frequently, and gas explosion accidents are the highest incidence of coal mine accidents. The authors selected 200 gas explosion accidents of coal mine enterprises in recent years, and extracted a large number of workers’ unsafe behaviors. Meanwhile, four working types related to gas explosion accidents were obtained, namely ventilation, gas prevention and fire extinguishing, blasting, and electrician. This article listed some influencing factors of unsafe behaviors and corrected the probability of unsafe behaviors. In addition, a probabilistic risk assessment model was established, and the Monte Carlo method was used to analyze the risks caused by unsafe behaviors of various working types. The results show that the risk of unsafe behaviors caused by the ventilation working type is the highest, followed by gas prevention and fire extinguishing, and finally blasting and electrician. This paper studies the influencing factors of miners’ unsafe behaviors from the perspective of behavior, guarantees effectively the safety management of coal mine enterprises, and lays a foundation for studying unsafe behaviors related to coal mine gas explosions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruipeng Tong & Yunyun Yang & Xiaofei Ma & Yanwei Zhang & Shian Li & Hongqing Yang, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Miners’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1765-:d:232337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beynon, Malcolm, 2001. "Reducts within the variable precision rough sets model: A further investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 592-605, November.
    2. Ruipeng Tong & Yanwei Zhang & Pengcheng Cui & Cunli Zhai & Meng Shi & Surui Xu, 2018. "Characteristic Analysis of Unsafe Behavior by Coal Miners: Multi-Dimensional Description of the Pan-Scene Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Qiao, Wanguan & Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun & Luo, Xixi & Wan, YuLong, 2018. "Using data mining techniques to analyze the influencing factor of unsafe behaviors in Chinese underground coal mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 210-216.
    4. Liu, Dehai & Xiao, Xingzhi & Li, Hongyi & Wang, Weiguo, 2015. "Historical evolution and benefit–cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 974-984.
    5. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2018. "Analysis of the Impact of Auxiliary Ventilation Equipment on the Distribution and Concentration of Methane in the Tailgate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Lu-jie Zhou & Qing-gui Cao & Kai Yu & Lin-lin Wang & Hai-bin Wang, 2018. "Research on Occupational Safety, Health Management and Risk Control Technology in Coal Mines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Yang & Xue Wang & Junqi Zhu & Liyan Sun & Zhiyuan Qin, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners’ Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Shuicheng Tian & Junrui Mao & Hongxia Li, 2022. "Disaster-Causing Mechanism of Hidden Disaster-Causing Factors of Major and Extraordinarily Serious Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine Goafs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Guirong Zhang & Wei Feng & Yu Lei, 2022. "Human Factor Analysis (HFA) Based on a Complex Network and Its Application in Gas Explosion Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Jiao Liu & Shuang Li & Weijun Bao & Kun Xu, 2022. "Could the Management System of Safety Partnership Change Miners’ Unsafe Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Qingsong Jia & Gui Fu & Xuecai Xie & Shihan Hu, 2022. "Method Construction and Evaluation: A More Comprehensive and Reliable Classification of Coal Mine Gas Explosion Causes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Lluís Sanmiquel-Pera & Marc Bascompta & Hernán Francisco Anticoi, 2019. "Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Xiaoyi Yang & Boling Zhang & Lulu Wang & Lanxin Cao & Ruipeng Tong, 2021. "Exploring the Relationships between Safety Compliance, Safety Participation and Safety Outcomes: Considering the Moderating Role of Job Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Guoshan Wu & Heqing Liu & Shixian Wu & Guanglei Liu & Caihang Liang, 2021. "Can Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Be Used as a Biomarker of Thermal Comfort for Mine Workers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    2. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    3. Yongkang Yang & Qiaoyi Du & Chenlong Wang & Yu Bai, 2020. "Research on the Method of Methane Emission Prediction Using Improved Grey Radial Basis Function Neural Network Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Fan, Ruguo & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 252-262.
    5. Wenke Wang & Xiaoqiong You & Kebei Liu & Yenchun Jim Wu & Daming You, 2020. "Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Yi Song & Dan Chang & Lizhu Cui, 2022. "The Evolutionary Game of Cooperative Air Pollution Management under Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Liu, Lu & Zhao, Qiuhong & Bi, Yanlin, 2020. "Why rent-seeking behavior may exist in Chinese mining safety production inspection system and how to alleviate it: A tripartite game analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Su, Chao-Ton & Hsu, Jyh-Hwa, 2006. "Precision parameter in the variable precision rough sets model: an application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 149-157, April.
    10. Wenxin Su & Xin Gao & Yukun Jiang & Jinrong Li, 2021. "Developing a Construction Safety Standard System to Enhance Safety Supervision Efficiency in China: A Theoretical Simulation of the Evolutionary Game Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Jin Tian & Yundou Wang & Shutian Gao, 2022. "Analysis of Mining-Related Injuries in Chinese Coal Mines and Related Risk Factors: A Statistical Research Study Based on a Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    13. Shuai Han & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long, 2020. "Who Reports Low Interactive Psychology Status? An Investigation Based on Chinese Coal Miners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Qiao, Wanguan, 2021. "Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    16. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    17. Shu Zhang & Xinyu Hua & Ganghai Huang & Xiuzhi Shi, 2022. "How Does Leadership in Safety Management Affect Employees’ Safety Performance? A Case Study from Mining Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Heiner Ackermann & Erik Diessel & Michael Helmling & Neil Jami & Johanna Münch, 2024. "Computing Optimal Mitigation Plans for Force-Majeure Scenarios in Dynamic Manufacturing Chains," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    19. Chen, Sen-Sen & Xu, Jin-Hua & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Evaluating the effect of coal mine safety supervision system policy in China's coal mining industry: A two-phase analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 12-21.
    20. Huiuk Yi & Minsik Kim & Dongkil Lee & Jongmyung Park, 2022. "Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Mine Ventilation in Mineral Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    21. Aigner, Philipp & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2023. "Enhancing gradient capital allocation with orthogonal convexity scenarios," ICIR Working Paper Series 47/23, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1765-:d:232337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.