IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i1p509-d716867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Difference in Brain Functional Connectivity between Chinese Coal Mine Workers Who Have Engaged in Unsafe Behavior and Those Who Have Not?

Author

Listed:
  • Fangyuan Tian

    (Institute of Safety Management & Risk Control, Institute of Safety & Emergency Management, School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Hongxia Li

    (Institute of Safety Management & Risk Control, Institute of Safety & Emergency Management, School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shuicheng Tian

    (Institute of Safety Management & Risk Control, Institute of Safety & Emergency Management, School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Chenning Tian

    (Institute of Safety Management & Risk Control, Institute of Safety & Emergency Management, School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Jiang Shao

    (School of Architecture & Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: As a world-recognized high-risk occupation, coal mine workers need various cognitive functions to process the surrounding information to cope with a large number of perceived hazards or risks. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the connection between coal mine workers’ neural activity and unsafe behavior from the perspective of cognitive neuroscience. This study explored the functional brain connectivity of coal mine workers who have engaged in unsafe behaviors (EUB) and those who have not (NUB). (2) Methods: Based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a total of 106 workers from the Hongliulin coal mine of Shaanxi North Mining Group, one of the largest modern coal mines in China, completed the test. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient ( COR ) analysis, brain network analysis, and two-sample t -test were used to investigate the difference in brain functional connectivity between the two groups. (3) Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in functional brain connectivity between EUB and NUB among the frontopolar area ( p = 0.002325), orbitofrontal area ( p = 0.02102), and pars triangularis Broca’s area ( p = 0.02888). Small-world properties existed in the brain networks of both groups, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex had significant differences in clustering coefficient ( p = 0.0004), nodal efficiency ( p = 0.0384), and nodal local efficiency ( p = 0.0004). (4) Conclusions: This study is the first application of fNIRS to the field of coal mine safety. The fNIRS brain functional connectivity analysis is a feasible method to investigate the neuropsychological mechanism of unsafe behavior in coal mine workers in the view of brain science.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangyuan Tian & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian & Chenning Tian & Jiang Shao, 2022. "Is There a Difference in Brain Functional Connectivity between Chinese Coal Mine Workers Who Have Engaged in Unsafe Behavior and Those Who Have Not?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:509-:d:716867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong, Ruipeng & Yang, Xiaoyi & Li, Hongwei & Li, Jianfei, 2019. "Dual process management of coal miners’ unsafe behaviour in the Chinese context: Evidence from a meta-analysis and inspired by the JD-R model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 205-217.
    2. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    3. Kevin Cyle Phillips & Derek Verbrigghe & Alex Gabe & Brittany Jauquet & Claire Eischer & Tejin Yoon, 2020. "The Influence of Thermal Alterations on Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Neuromuscular Function during a Fatiguing Task," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Qiao, Wanguan & Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun & Luo, Xixi & Wan, YuLong, 2018. "Using data mining techniques to analyze the influencing factor of unsafe behaviors in Chinese underground coal mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 210-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fangyuan Tian & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian & Jiang Shao & Chenning Tian, 2022. "Effect of Shift Work on Cognitive Function in Chinese Coal Mine Workers: A Resting-State fNIRS Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan & Aziz, Hanida Abdul, 2021. "Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Huan Wang & Chuang Ma & Han-Shuang Chen & Ying-Cheng Lai & Hai-Feng Zhang, 2022. "Full reconstruction of simplicial complexes from binary contagion and Ising data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Vinayak, & Raghuvanshi, Adarsh & kshitij, Avinash, 2023. "Signatures of capacity development through research collaborations in artificial intelligence and machine learning," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    4. Supriya Tiwari & Pallavi Basu, 2024. "Quasi-randomization tests for network interference," Papers 2403.16673, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    5. Anzhi Sheng & Qi Su & Aming Li & Long Wang & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2023. "Constructing temporal networks with bursty activity patterns," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    7. Wang, Xiaojie & Slamu, Wushour & Guo, Wenqiang & Wang, Sixiu & Ren, Yan, 2022. "A novel semi local measure of identifying influential nodes in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Lin, Dan & Wu, Jiajing & Xuan, Qi & Tse, Chi K., 2022. "Ethereum transaction tracking: Inferring evolution of transaction networks via link prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    9. Ferreira, D.S.R. & Ribeiro, J. & Oliveira, P.S.L. & Pimenta, A.R. & Freitas, R.P. & Dutra, R.S. & Papa, A.R.R. & Mendes, J.F.F., 2022. "Spatiotemporal analysis of earthquake occurrence in synthetic and worldwide data," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    10. Mario V. Tomasello & Mauro Napoletano & Antonios Garas & Frank Schweitzer, 2017. "The rise and fall of R&D networks," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 617-646.
    11. Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Xinyu Huang & Dongming Chen & Dongqi Wang & Tao Ren, 2020. "MINE: Identifying Top- k Vital Nodes in Complex Networks via Maximum Influential Neighbors Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Jianhong Chen & Hongcai Ma & Shan Yang, 2023. "SEIOR Rumor Propagation Model Considering Hesitating Mechanism and Different Rumor-Refuting Ways in Complex Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Xiaokun Su & Chenrouyu Zheng & Yefei Yang & Yafei Yang & Wen Zhao & Yue Yu, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Development Patterns of Urban Traffic Flow Network in Less Developed Areas: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Daniel Reisinger & Fabian Tschofenig & Raven Adam & Marie Lisa Kogler & Manfred Füllsack & Fabian Veider & Georg Jäger, 2024. "Patterns of stability in complex contagions," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1895-1911, October.
    17. Manisha Sawant & Rupali Patil & Tanmay Shikhare & Shreyas Nagle & Sakshi Chavan & Shivang Negi & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2022. "A Selective Review on Recent Advancements in Long, Short and Ultra-Short-Term Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Vincenza Carchiolo & Marco Grassia & Michele Malgeri & Giuseppe Mangioni, 2022. "Co-Authorship Networks Analysis to Discover Collaboration Patterns among Italian Researchers," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Gregory Gutin & Tomohiro Hirano & Sung-Ha Hwang & Philip R. Neary & Alexis Akira Toda, 2021. "The effect of social distancing on the reach of an epidemic in social networks," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(3), pages 629-647, July.
    20. Jie, Ke-Wei & Liu, San-Yang & Sun, Xiao-Jun & Xu, Yun-Cheng, 2023. "A dynamic ripple-spreading algorithm for solving mean–variance of shortest path model in uncertain random networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:509-:d:716867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.