IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10195-d1526307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Behavior-Based Safety in the Workplace: A Review of Conceptual and Empirical Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Carra

    (Department of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products and Anthropic Settlements, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Via Roberto Ferruzzi, 38, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Eleonora Bottani

    (Department of Engineering for Industrial Systems and Technologies, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 181/A, 43124 Parma, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Vignali

    (Department of Engineering for Industrial Systems and Technologies, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 181/A, 43124 Parma, Italy)

  • Marianna Madonna

    (Operational Territorial Unit of Naples—Certification, Verification and Research Area, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Via Nuova Poggioreale, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Luigi Monica

    (Department of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products and Anthropic Settlements, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Via Roberto Ferruzzi, 38, 00143 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Behavior-Based Safety (BBS) methodology is more and more implemented by companies in several industrial fields for preserving workers’ safety through a structured behavioral intervention with measurable effects as part of a socially sustainable approach for health and wellness care at the workplace. Although the traditional BBS components have been widely described in literature, its evolution over the years in terms of application strategies and complexity levels still requires some insights. Also, it is often difficult to identify clear boundaries between “standard” BBS and similar or complementary interventions. To clarify some of these aspects, in this work approximately 230 scientific papers about BBS and related topics, published from the 1970s until 2023, were retrieved from the Scopus database, classified in a structured way, and analyzed from different perspectives. Results highlight the main peculiarities, limits, and strengths of BBS in its evolution, from a conceptual as well as a practical point of view, with a particular focus on the trends observed in the last two decades. Outcomes suggest that future prospects of BBS will integrate the successful traditional principles of positive feedback and observation with new elements, including technological aspects, full involvement of the company’s levels, and attention to workers’ peculiarities, thus creating variants of the approach suitable for different contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Carra & Eleonora Bottani & Giuseppe Vignali & Marianna Madonna & Luigi Monica, 2024. "Implementation of Behavior-Based Safety in the Workplace: A Review of Conceptual and Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-49, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10195-:d:1526307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva L Bergsten & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Johan Larsson & Lydia Kwak, 2018. "Implementation of an ergonomics intervention in a Swedish flight baggage handling company—A process evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Iain Cameron & Roy Duff, 2007. "Use of performance measurement and goal setting to improve construction managers' focus on health and safety," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 869-881.
    3. Mario Fargnoli & Mara Lombardi, 2020. "NOSACQ-50 for Safety Climate Assessment in Agricultural Activities: A Case Study in Central Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    5. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan, 2023. "Investigate the factors affecting safety culture in the Malaysian mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    6. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170210783214 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jorunn-Elise Tharaldsen & Knut Haukelid, 2009. "Culture and behavioural perspectives on safety -- towards a balanced approach," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3-4), pages 375-388, June.
    8. F. Brocal & C. González & D. Komljenovic & P. F. Katina & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2019. "Emerging Risk Management in Industry 4.0: An Approach to Improve Organizational and Human Performance in the Complex Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, June.
    9. Iain Cameron & Roy Duff, 2007. "A critical review of safety initiatives using goal setting and feedback," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 495-508.
    10. Ruipeng Tong & Yunyun Yang & Xiaofei Ma & Yanwei Zhang & Shian Li & Hongqing Yang, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Miners’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    2. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    4. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.
    5. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    6. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. M. M. Ahmed & A. Sadoon & M. T. Bassuoni & A. Ghazy, 2024. "Utilizing Agricultural Residues from Hot and Cold Climates as Sustainable SCMs for Low-Carbon Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-37, December.
    8. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    9. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Urša Golob & Mark A. P. Davies & Joachim Kernstock & Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Trending topics plus future challenges and opportunities in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 123-129, March.
    11. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    14. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    15. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    18. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10195-:d:1526307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.