IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i22p6112-d448977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Method of Methane Emission Prediction Using Improved Grey Radial Basis Function Neural Network Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yongkang Yang

    (Key Laboratory of In-Situ Property-Improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
    State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qiaoyi Du

    (Key Laboratory of In-Situ Property-Improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Chenlong Wang

    (Key Laboratory of In-Situ Property-Improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Yu Bai

    (Key Laboratory of In-Situ Property-Improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

Abstract

Effectively avoiding methane accidents is vital to the security of manufacturing minerals. Coal mine methane accidents are often caused by a methane concentration overrun, and accurately predicting methane emission quantity in a coal mine is key to solving this problem. To maintain the concentration of methane in a secure range, grey theory and neural network model are increasingly used to critically forecasting methane emission quantity in coal mines. A limitation of the grey neural network model is that researchers have merely combined the conventional neural network and grey theory. To enhance the accuracy of prediction, a modified grey GM (1,1) and radial basis function (RBF) neural network model is proposed, which combines the amended grey GM (1,1) model and RBF neural network model. In this article, the proposed model is put into a simulation experiment, which is built based on Matlab software (MathWorks.Inc, Natick, Masezius, U.S). Ultimately, the conclusion of the simulation experiment verified that the modified grey GM (1,1) and RBF neural network model not only boosts the precision of prediction, but also restricts relative error in a minimum range. This shows that the modified grey GM (1,1) and RBF neural network model can make more effective and precise predict the predicts, compared to the grey GM (1,1) model and RBF neural network model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongkang Yang & Qiaoyi Du & Chenlong Wang & Yu Bai, 2020. "Research on the Method of Methane Emission Prediction Using Improved Grey Radial Basis Function Neural Network Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:6112-:d:448977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/6112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/6112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Wei & Younger, Paul L. & Cheng, Yuanping & Zhang, Baoyong & Zhou, Hongxing & Liu, Qingquan & Dai, Tao & Kong, Shengli & Jin, Kan & Yang, Quanlin, 2015. "Addressing the CO2 emissions of the world's largest coal producer and consumer: Lessons from the Haishiwan Coalfield, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 400-413.
    2. Zhang, Bo & Chen, G.Q., 2014. "Methane emissions in China 2007," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 886-902.
    3. Haitao Sun & Jie Cao & Minghui Li & Xusheng Zhao & Linchao Dai & Dongling Sun & Bo Wang & Boning Zhai, 2018. "Experimental Research on the Impactive Dynamic Effect of Gas-Pulverized Coal of Coal and Gas Outburst," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2019. "Forecasting Methane Emissions from Hard Coal Mines Including the Methane Drainage Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Zhang, Bo & Chen, G.Q., 2010. "Methane emissions by Chinese economy: Inventory and embodiment analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4304-4316, August.
    6. Liu, Dehai & Xiao, Xingzhi & Li, Hongyi & Wang, Weiguo, 2015. "Historical evolution and benefit–cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 974-984.
    7. Xiong Yang & Yingshu Liu & Ziyi Li & Chuanzhao Zhang & Yi Xing, 2018. "Vacuum Exhaust Process in Pilot-Scale Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption for Coal Mine Ventilation Air Methane Enrichment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen, Hu & Yan, Li & Jin, Yongfei & Wang, Zhipeng & Guo, Jun & Deng, Jun, 2023. "Coalbed methane concentration prediction and early-warning in fully mechanized mining face based on deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2021. "Research on Early Warning for Gas Risks at a Working Face Based on Association Rule Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, L.X. & Wang, C.B. & Bahaj, A.S., 2014. "Carbon emissions by rural energy in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 641-649.
    2. Zhang, Bo & Yang, T.R. & Chen, B. & Sun, X.D., 2016. "China’s regional CH4 emissions: Characteristics, interregional transfer and mitigation policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1184-1195.
    3. Pan, Hengyu & Zheng, Xiangyu & Wu, Rui & Liu, Xincong & Xiao, Shijiang & Sun, Lu & Hu, Tianzi & Gao, Ziyan & Yang, Liping & Huang, Chengyi & Zhang, Xiaohong & Deng, Shihuai & Xiao, Yinlong, 2024. "Agriculture related methane emissions embodied in China's interprovincial trade," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    5. Yuan, Zhiyi & Ou, Xunmin & Peng, Tianduo & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2019. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in china considering methane leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Fan, Lurong & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Authority–enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for carbon reduction and energy utilization in the coalbed methane industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Fan, Ruguo & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 252-262.
    8. Lixiao Zhang & Qiuhong Hu & Fan Zhang, 2014. "Input-Output Modeling for Urban Energy Consumption in Beijing: Dynamics and Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Marcin Karbownik & Agnieszka Dudzińska & Jarosław Strzymczok, 2022. "Multi-Parameter Analysis of Gas Losses Occurring during the Determination of Methane-Bearing Capacity in Hard Coal Beds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Wenke Wang & Xiaoqiong You & Kebei Liu & Yenchun Jim Wu & Daming You, 2020. "Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, Z.M., 2011. "Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological input–output modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2362-2376.
    12. Yi Song & Dan Chang & Lizhu Cui, 2022. "The Evolutionary Game of Cooperative Air Pollution Management under Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Liu, Lu & Zhao, Qiuhong & Bi, Yanlin, 2020. "Why rent-seeking behavior may exist in Chinese mining safety production inspection system and how to alleviate it: A tripartite game analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Wenxin Su & Xin Gao & Yukun Jiang & Jinrong Li, 2021. "Developing a Construction Safety Standard System to Enhance Safety Supervision Efficiency in China: A Theoretical Simulation of the Evolutionary Game Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Kai Yin & Dengsheng Lu & Yichen Tian & Qianjun Zhao & Chao Yuan, 2014. "Evaluation of Carbon and Oxygen Balances in Urban Ecosystems Using Land Use/Land Cover and Statistical Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Chen, G.Q. & Zhang, Bo, 2010. "Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: Inventory and input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6180-6193, October.
    17. Zhang, Bo & Chen, Z.M. & Xia, X.H. & Xu, X.Y. & Chen, Y.B., 2013. "The impact of domestic trade on China's regional energy uses: A multi-regional input–output modeling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1169-1181.
    18. Chen, Sen-Sen & Xu, Jin-Hua & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Evaluating the effect of coal mine safety supervision system policy in China's coal mining industry: A two-phase analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 12-21.
    19. Wang, Ke & Zhang, Jianjun & Cai, Bofeng & Yu, Shengmin, 2019. "Emission factors of fugitive methane from underground coal mines in China: Estimation and uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 273-282.
    20. Hua Pan & Xin Song & Jianchao Hou & Siyi Tan, 2024. "Evolutionary Game Analysis Between Large Power Consumers and Power Sellers in the Context of Big-Data-Driven Value-Added Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:6112-:d:448977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.