IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i6p389-d70675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and a Validation of a Charge Sensitive Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Simulation Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Ziviani

    (Department of Flow, Heat, and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Brandon J. Woodland

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Emeline Georges

    (Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, Energy Systems, University of Liege, Liege 4000, Belgium)

  • Eckhard A. Groll

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • James E. Braun

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • W. Travis Horton

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Martijn Van den Broek

    (Department of Flow, Heat, and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Michel De Paepe

    (Department of Flow, Heat, and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems and the large number of cycle models proposed in the literature, charge-based ORC models are still almost absent. In this paper, a detailed overall ORC simulation model is presented based on two solution strategies: condenser subcooling and total working fluid charge of the system. The latter allows the subcooling level to be predicted rather than specified as an input. The overall cycle model is composed of independent models for pump, expander, line sets, liquid receiver and heat exchangers. Empirical and semi-empirical models are adopted for the pump and expander, respectively. A generalized steady-state moving boundary method is used to model the heat exchangers. The line sets and liquid receiver are used to better estimate the total charge of the system and pressure drops. Finally, the individual components are connected to form a cycle model in an object-oriented fashion. The solution algorithm includes a preconditioner to guess reasonable values for the evaporating and condensing temperatures and a main cycle solver loop which drives to zero a set of residuals to ensure the convergence of the solution. The model has been developed in the Python programming language. A thorough validation is then carried out against experimental data obtained from two test setups having different nominal size, working fluids and individual components: (i) a regenerative ORC with a 5 kW scroll expander and an oil flooding loop; (ii) a regenerative ORC with a 11 kW single-screw expander. The computer code is made available through open-source dissemination.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Ziviani & Brandon J. Woodland & Emeline Georges & Eckhard A. Groll & James E. Braun & W. Travis Horton & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2016. "Development and a Validation of a Charge Sensitive Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Simulation Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-36, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:389-:d:70675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/6/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/6/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    2. Long, R. & Bao, Y.J. & Huang, X.M. & Liu, W., 2014. "Exergy analysis and working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 475-483.
    3. Jung, Hyung-Chul & Taylor, Leighton & Krumdieck, Susan, 2015. "An experimental and modelling study of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle unit with mixture working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 601-614.
    4. Declaye, Sébastien & Quoilin, Sylvain & Guillaume, Ludovic & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Experimental study on an open-drive scroll expander integrated into an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) system with R245fa as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 173-183.
    5. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    6. Bracco, Roberto & Clemente, Stefano & Micheli, Diego & Reini, Mauro, 2013. "Experimental tests and modelization of a domestic-scale ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 107-116.
    7. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    8. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    9. Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent & Lebrun, Jean, 2010. "Experimental study and modeling of an Organic Rankine Cycle using scroll expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1260-1268, April.
    10. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oh, Jinwoo & Park, Yunjae & Lee, Hoseong, 2022. "Development of a fully deterministic simulation model for organic Rankine cycle operating under off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Oh, Jinwoo & Jeong, Hoyoung & Lee, Hoseong, 2021. "Experimental and numerical analysis on low-temperature off-design organic Rankine cycle in perspective of mass conservation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Dickes, Rémi & Dumont, Olivier & Guillaume, Ludovic & Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent, 2018. "Charge-sensitive modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems for off-design performance simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1262-1281.
    4. Fabio Fatigati & Diego Vittorini & Yaxiong Wang & Jian Song & Christos N. Markides & Roberto Cipollone, 2020. "Design and Operational Control Strategy for Optimum Off-Design Performance of an ORC Plant for Low-Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Giuffrida, Antonio, 2017. "Improving the semi-empirical modelling of a single-screw expander for small organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 356-368.
    6. Dickes, Rémi & Dumont, Olivier & Daccord, Rémi & Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent, 2017. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems in off-design conditions: An experimentally-validated comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 710-727.
    7. Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Wang, Tiantian & Gao, Naiping, 2019. "Experimental investigation on the effect of working fluid charge in a small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle under off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 664-677.
    8. Osman Özkaraca & Pınar Keçebaş & Cihan Demircan & Ali Keçebaş, 2017. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Geothermal- Based Organic Rankine Cycle System Using an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Ziviani, D. & Gusev, S. & Lecompte, S. & Groll, E.A. & Braun, J.E. & Horton, W.T. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2017. "Optimizing the performance of small-scale organic Rankine cycle that utilizes a single-screw expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-432.
    10. Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Lecompte, Steven & Paepe, Michel De & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Off-design optimisation of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engines with different heat exchangers and volumetric expanders in waste heat recovery applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Ziviani, Davide & James, Nelson A. & Accorsi, Felipe A. & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2018. "Experimental and numerical analyses of a 5 kWe oil-free open-drive scroll expander for small-scale organic Rankine cycle (ORC) applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1140-1156.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    2. Ziviani, D. & Gusev, S. & Lecompte, S. & Groll, E.A. & Braun, J.E. & Horton, W.T. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2017. "Optimizing the performance of small-scale organic Rankine cycle that utilizes a single-screw expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-432.
    3. Kang, Seok Hun, 2016. "Design and preliminary tests of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) with two-stage radial turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 142-154.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    5. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Lee, Dong-Hyun, 2016. "Volumetric expanders for low grade heat and waste heat recovery applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1090-1109.
    6. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    7. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    8. Yamada, Noboru & Tominaga, Yoshihito & Yoshida, Takanori, 2014. "Demonstration of 10-Wp micro organic Rankine cycle generator for low-grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 806-813.
    9. Sung, Taehong & Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Hyun Dong & Yoon, Sang Youl & Choi, Bum Seog & Kim, Kuisoon & Kim, Jangmok & Jung, Yang Beom & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2016. "Performance characteristics of a 200-kW organic Rankine cycle system in a steel processing plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 623-635.
    10. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Feng, Yong-qiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Su, Ting-Ying & Wang, Shuang & Wang, Qian & Yang, Shih-Cheng & Lin, Jaw-Ren & Lin, Chih-Hung, 2017. "Experimental investigation of a R245fa-based organic Rankine cycle adapting two operation strategies: Stand alone and grid connect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1239-1253.
    12. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    13. Rech, Sergio & Zandarin, Simone & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2017. "Design and off-design models of single and two-stage ORC systems on board a LNG carrier for the search of the optimal performance and control strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-241.
    14. Zhang, Hong-Hu & Xi, Huan & He, Ya-Ling & Zhang, Yu-Wen & Ning, Bo, 2019. "Experimental study of the organic rankine cycle under different heat and cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 678-688.
    15. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    16. Yang, Xufei & Xu, Jinliang & Miao, Zheng & Zou, Jinghuang & Yu, Chao, 2015. "Operation of an organic Rankine cycle dependent on pumping flow rates and expander torques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 864-878.
    17. Lecompte, Steven & Gusev, Sergei & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2018. "Experimental results of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle: Steady state identification and application to off-design model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 82-106.
    18. Lei, Biao & Wang, Wei & Wu, Yu-Ting & Ma, Chong-Fang & Wang, Jing-Fu & Zhang, Lei & Li, Chuang & Zhao, Ying-Kun & Zhi, Rui-Ping, 2016. "Development and experimental study on a single screw expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 43-52.
    19. Roumpedakis, Tryfon C. & Loumpardis, George & Monokrousou, Evropi & Braimakis, Konstantinos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic and economic analysis of a solar driven small scale ORC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1008-1024.
    20. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:389-:d:70675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.