IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v5y2012i12p4924-4940d21702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of Synthesis Gas Production from Steam Oxygen Gasification of Colombian Coal Using Aspen Plus ®

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge E. Preciado

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia)

  • John J. Ortiz-Martinez

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia)

  • Juan C. Gonzalez-Rivera

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia)

  • Rocio Sierra-Ramirez

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia)

  • Gerardo Gordillo

    (Energy Conversion Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia)

Abstract

A steady state simulation of syngas production from a Steam Oxygen Gasification process using commercial technologies was performed using Aspen Plus ® . For the simulation, the average proximate and ultimate compositions of bituminous coal obtained from the Colombian Andean region were employed. The simulation was applied to conduct sensitivity analyses in the O 2 to coal mass ratio, coal slurry concentration, WGS operating temperature and WGS steam to dry gas molar ratio (SDG) over the key parameters: syngas molar composition, overall CO conversion in the WGS reactors, H 2 rich-syngas lower heating value (LHV) and thermal efficiency. The achieved information allows the selection of critical operating conditions leading to improve system efficiency and environmental performance. The results indicate that the oxygen to carbon ratio is a key variable as it affects significantly both the LHV and thermal efficiency. Nevertheless, the process becomes almost insensitive to SDG values higher than 2. Finally, a thermal efficiency of 62.6% can be reached. This result corresponds to a slurry solid concentration of 0.65, a WGS process SDG of 0.59, and a LTS reactor operating temperature of 473 K. With these fixed variables, a syngas with H 2 molar composition of 92.2% and LHV of 12 MJ Nm −3 was attained.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge E. Preciado & John J. Ortiz-Martinez & Juan C. Gonzalez-Rivera & Rocio Sierra-Ramirez & Gerardo Gordillo, 2012. "Simulation of Synthesis Gas Production from Steam Oxygen Gasification of Colombian Coal Using Aspen Plus ®," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:12:p:4924-4940:d:21702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/12/4924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/12/4924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nancy Eloísa Rodríguez-Olalde & Erick Alejandro Mendoza-Chávez & Agustín Jaime Castro-Montoya & Jaime Saucedo-Luna & Rafael Maya-Yescas & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones & José María Ponce Ortega, 2015. "Simulation of Syngas Production from Lignin Using Guaiacol as a Model Compound," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, June.
    2. P, Ramakrishnan & Singh, Jagadish Kumar & Sahoo, Abanti & Mohapatra, Soumya Sanjeeb, 2023. "CFD simulation for coal gasification in fluidized bed gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    4. Xianbin Xiao & Xueying Wang & Zongming Zheng & Wu Qin & Yumengqiu Zhou, 2019. "Catalytic Coal Gasification Process Simulation with Alkaline Organic Wastewater in a Fluidized Bed Reactor Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Hossam A. Gabbar & Mohamed Aboughaly & Stefano Russo, 2017. "Conceptual Design and Energy Analysis of Integrated Combined Cycle Gasification System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & Sharma, Manish & Zeaiter, Joseph & Abbas, Ali, 2016. "Model-based analysis of CO2 revalorization for di-methyl ether synthesis driven by solar catalytic reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 863-878.
    7. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    8. Tungalag, Azjargal & Lee, BongJu & Yadav, Manoj & Akande, Olugbenga, 2020. "Yield prediction of MSW gasification including minor species through ASPEN plus simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Antoniou, N. & Stavropoulos, G. & Zabaniotou, A., 2014. "Activation of end of life tyres pyrolytic char for enhancing viability of pyrolysis – Critical review, analysis and recommendations for a hybrid dual system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1053-1073.
    3. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    4. Yan, Kai & Wu, Guosheng & Lafleur, Todd & Jarvis, Cody, 2014. "Production, properties and catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to fuel additives and value-added chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 663-676.
    5. Theodore Dickerson & Juan Soria, 2013. "Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    7. Syed-Hassan, Syed Shatir A. & Wang, Yi & Hu, Song & Su, Sheng & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 888-913.
    8. Dariusz Kurczyński & Grzegorz Wcisło & Piotr Łagowski, 2021. "Experimental Study of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Gas Composition of a Diesel Engine Powered by Biodiesel from Waste of Animal Origin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Enagi, Ibrahim I. & Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2018. "Liquid biofuels utilization for gas turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 43-55.
    10. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    11. Velazquez Abad, Anthony & Cherrett, Tom & Holdsworth, Peter, 2015. "Waste-to-fuel opportunities for British quick service restaurants: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 239-253.
    12. Kasmuri, N.H. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Abdullah, S.R.S. & Hasan, H.A. & Som, A.Md., 2017. "Process system engineering aspect of bio-alcohol fuel production from biomass via pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 914-923.
    13. Kim, Young-Doo & Yang, Chang-Won & Kim, Beom-Jong & Moon, Ji-Hong & Jeong, Jae-Yong & Jeong, Soo-Hwa & Lee, See-Hoon & Kim, Jae-Ho & Seo, Myung-Won & Lee, Sang-Bong & Kim, Jae-Kon & Lee, Uen-Do, 2016. "Fischer–tropsch diesel production and evaluation as alternative automotive fuel in pilot-scale integrated biomass-to-liquid process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 301-312.
    14. Panwar, N.L. & Kothari, Richa & Tyagi, V.V., 2012. "Thermo chemical conversion of biomass – Eco friendly energy routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1801-1816.
    15. Jradi, M. & Riffat, S., 2014. "Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 396-415.
    16. Zhang, Kai & Chang, Jian & Guan, Yanjun & Chen, Honggang & Yang, Yongping & Jiang, Jianchun, 2013. "Lignocellulosic biomass gasification technology in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 175-184.
    17. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    18. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2012. "System aspects of biomass gasification with methanol synthesis – Process concepts and energy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 817-828.
    19. Ossai, Chinedu I. & Boswell, Brian & Davies, Ian J., 2014. "Sustainable asset integrity management: Strategic imperatives for economic renewable energy generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 143-152.
    20. Patel, Madhumita & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1486-1499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:12:p:4924-4940:d:21702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.