IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i8p1474-d108915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Design and Energy Analysis of Integrated Combined Cycle Gasification System

Author

Listed:
  • Hossam A. Gabbar

    (Faculty of Energy Systems and Nuclear Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
    Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

  • Mohamed Aboughaly

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

  • Stefano Russo

    (Faculty of Energy Systems and Nuclear Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
    Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Torino 10129, Italy)

Abstract

In this paper, an integrated gasification combined cycle conceptual design that achieves optimum energy efficiency and 82.9% heat integration between hot and cold utilities is illustrated. The integrated combined gasification cycle (IGCC) is also modeled and evaluated for the co-production of electricity, ammonia and methane for 543.13 kilo tonne per annum (KTA) of municipal solid waste (MSW). The final products are 1284.89 MW, 8731.07 kg/h of liquid ammonia at 8 °C and 32,468 kg/h of methane gas at 271 °C. The conceptual design includes advanced heat integration between syngas and hot and cold streams in all process units. The water gas shift (WGS) unit includes integration between equilibrium reactors and cold streams. The air separation unit (ASU) includes four air compressors followed by a pressure swing adsorber (PSA), which separates oxygen and nitrogen gases into separate streams. Both O 2 and N 2 gases are compressed and sent to gasifier and syngas cleaning unit, respectively. The overall design shows reliability and solved steady state equations for all process units with improvements in thermal efficiency in comparison with single cycle gasification plants. The environmental emissions for GHGs such CO 2 and SO 2 are lower due to higher overall energy efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossam A. Gabbar & Mohamed Aboughaly & Stefano Russo, 2017. "Conceptual Design and Energy Analysis of Integrated Combined Cycle Gasification System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1474-:d:108915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rocco, Matteo V. & Di Lucchio, Alberto & Colombo, Emanuela, 2017. "Exergy Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from Waste-to-Energy technology: A Hybrid Input-Output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 832-844.
    2. Lee, Jae Chul & Lee, Hyeon Hui & Joo, Yong Jin & Lee, Chang Ha & Oh, Min, 2014. "Process simulation and thermodynamic analysis of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant with an entrained coal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 58-68.
    3. Ping Wang & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2013. "Slag Behavior in Gasifiers. Part I: Influence of Coal Properties and Gasification Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Timo Blumberg & Max Sorgenfrei & George Tsatsaronis, 2015. "Design and Assessment of an IGCC Concept with CO 2 Capture for the Co-Generation of Electricity and Substitute Natural Gas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Pérez-Fortes, M. & Bojarski, A.D. & Velo, E. & Nougués, J.M. & Puigjaner, L., 2009. "Conceptual model and evaluation of generated power and emissions in an IGCC plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1721-1732.
    6. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    7. Sharmina Begum & Mohammad G. Rasul & Delwar Akbar & Naveed Ramzan, 2013. "Performance Analysis of an Integrated Fixed Bed Gasifier Model for Different Biomass Feedstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Liu, Hengwei & Ni, Weidou & Li, Zheng & Ma, Linwei, 2008. "Strategic thinking on IGCC development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Poma, Christian & Verda, Vittorio & Consonni, Stefano, 2010. "Design and performance evaluation of a waste-to-energy plant integrated with a combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 786-793.
    10. Jorge E. Preciado & John J. Ortiz-Martinez & Juan C. Gonzalez-Rivera & Rocio Sierra-Ramirez & Gerardo Gordillo, 2012. "Simulation of Synthesis Gas Production from Steam Oxygen Gasification of Colombian Coal Using Aspen Plus ®," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Patrik Furda, 2021. "Comment on Hamayun et al. Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis. Energies 2020, 13 , 6361," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-8, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    3. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    4. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    5. Lee, Woo-Sung & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance analysis and carbon reduction assessment of an integrated syngas purification process for the co-production of hydrogen and power in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 910-927.
    6. Li, Zhengang & Guo, Zhancheng & Gong, Xuzhong & Tang, Huiqing, 2013. "Kinetic characteristics of pulverized coal combustion in the two-phase flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 585-593.
    7. Naraharisetti, Pavan Kumar & Lakshminarayanan, S. & Karimi, I.A., 2014. "Design of biomass and natural gas based IGFC using multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 635-652.
    8. Nancy Eloísa Rodríguez-Olalde & Erick Alejandro Mendoza-Chávez & Agustín Jaime Castro-Montoya & Jaime Saucedo-Luna & Rafael Maya-Yescas & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones & José María Ponce Ortega, 2015. "Simulation of Syngas Production from Lignin Using Guaiacol as a Model Compound," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, June.
    9. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    10. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    12. Dutta, Rohan & Ghosh, Parthasarathi & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2011. "Customization and validation of a commercial process simulator for dynamic simulation of Helium liquefier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3204-3214.
    13. Santa Margarida Santos & Ana Carolina Assis & Leandro Gomes & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito, 2022. "Waste Gasification Technologies: A Brief Overview," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Mingke Shen & Kunzan Qiu & Long Zhang & Zhenyu Huang & Zhihua Wang & Jianzhong Liu, 2015. "Influence of Coal Blending on Ash Fusibility in Reducing Atmosphere," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Xue, Xiaodong & Liu, Changchun & Han, Wei & Wang, Zefeng & Zhang, Na & Jin, Hongguang & Wang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Proposal and investigation of a high-efficiency coal-fired power generation system enabled by chemical recuperative supercritical water coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    16. M. Shahabuddin & Tanvir Alam, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Fuels (Coal, Biomass and MSW): Overview, Challenges and Mitigation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin, 2013. "Cogeneration of substitute natural gas and power from coal by moderate recycle of the chemical unconverted gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 658-667.
    18. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    19. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    20. Nargess Puadian & Jingge Li & Shusheng Pang, 2014. "Analysis of Operation Parameters in a Dual Fluidized Bed Biomass Gasifier Integrated with a Biomass Rotary Dryer: Development and Application of a System Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1474-:d:108915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.