IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1143-d1600037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of Combined Aging Effects for Battery Operated Trains: A Benchmark Case Study on the Line Between Reggio Calabria and Catanzaro

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Pugi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, France)

  • Tommaso Elios Povolato

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, France)

  • Nico Tiezzi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, France)

Abstract

The expected life and reliability of components is a critical aspect for railway applications where the expected life and maintenance intervals of rolling stock are quite demanding issues both in terms of equivalent mileage and duration. For these reasons, when the mileage of the mission is within 100 km, adopted accumulators are based on lithium titanate chemistry, which, despite a relatively low density, ensures a very long operational life both in terms of cycle and time aging. In this work, the authors introduce a benchmark test case, an Italian line between Reggio Calabria and Catanzaro, in which the required autonomy, more than 170 km, involves the usage of high-energy batteries such as LiNMC or LiFePO 4 derived from corresponding automotive applications. In this work, the authors propose a simulation model based on IEC 62864-1:2016 to investigate how the combined effect of cycle and time aging should influence in different ways the design of the system and how relatively small interventions such as the partial electrification of a small intermediate section of the line should improve the overall stability and reliability of the performed engineering analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Pugi & Tommaso Elios Povolato & Nico Tiezzi, 2025. "Simulation of Combined Aging Effects for Battery Operated Trains: A Benchmark Case Study on the Line Between Reggio Calabria and Catanzaro," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1143-:d:1600037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1143-:d:1600037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.