IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3452-d1123794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Simulation Test of Underground Coal Gasification Cavity Evolution in the Horizontal Segment of U-Shaped Well

Author

Listed:
  • Yufeng Zhao

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhen Dong

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanpeng Chen

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hao Chen

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shanshan Chen

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mengyuan Zhang

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Junjie Xue

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xinggang Wang

    (Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Tuha Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Hami 839009, China)

  • Lixin Jiao

    (Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Tuha Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Hami 839009, China)

Abstract

A key point in the underground coal gasification process is the cavity evolution in the horizontal segment. The morphological evolution law of the gasification cavity has not been clarified, which is the bottleneck restricting the analysis of its controllability. In this paper, a physical simulation system for cavity generation was developed, and the cavity evolution in a targeted coal seam with overburden pressure was duplicated in the laboratory. A set of temperature field synchronous monitoring devices was developed to realize temperature sampling within a cavity and the surrounding rock. By analyzing the relationship between the overall temperature distribution pattern and the gasification agent injection condition, the morphological propagation law of the cavity is verified to be water drop-shaped, and influencing factors including the injection flow rate and the gasification agent component ratio are investigated. The axial length and volume of the cavity increase with an increasing injection flow rate. Higher oxygen content results in increased size in all dimensions. The research results provide theoretical support and reference for applying controlled cavity formation in the horizontal segment of U-shaped wells.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufeng Zhao & Zhen Dong & Yanpeng Chen & Hao Chen & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Xinggang Wang & Lixin Jiao, 2023. "Physical Simulation Test of Underground Coal Gasification Cavity Evolution in the Horizontal Segment of U-Shaped Well," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3452-:d:1123794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Mathur, D.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2010. "Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2374-2386.
    2. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    2. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Prabu, V., 2015. "Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Su, Fa-qiang & He, Xiao-long & Dai, Meng-jia & Yang, Jun-nan & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Yu, Yi-he & Li, Wen & Li, Jiao-yuan, 2023. "Estimation of the cavity volume in the gasification zone for underground coal gasification under different oxygen flow conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Su, Fa-qiang & Wu, Jun-bo & Tao-Zhang, & Deng, Qi-chao & Yu, Yi-he & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Dai, Meng-Jia & Yang, Jun-Nan & He, Xiao-long, 2023. "Study on the monitoring method of cavity growth in underground coal gasification under laboratory conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    7. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal & Samar, Raza, 2019. "Prediction and parametric analysis of cavity growth for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1277-1290.
    8. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    9. Jowkar, Amin & Sereshki, Farhang & Najafi, Mehdi, 2018. "A new model for evaluation of cavity shape and volume during Underground Coal Gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 756-765.
    10. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Laboratory scale studies on simulated underground coal gasification of high ash coals for carbon-neutral power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358.
    12. Huijun Fang & Yuewu Liu & Tengze Ge & Taiyi Zheng & Yueyu Yu & Danlu Liu & Jiuge Ding & Longlong Li, 2022. "A Review of Research on Cavity Growth in the Context of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    14. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    15. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    16. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Mohammadreza Shahbazi & Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji, 2019. "On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 373-398, March.
    18. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    19. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Hongtao Liu & Feng Chen & Yuanyuan Wang & Gang Liu & Hong Yao & Shuqin Liu, 2018. "Experimental Study of Reverse Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3452-:d:1123794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.