IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i4p931-d1591767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Simulation of Temperature Field Evolution and Distribution Range During Movement of Underground Coal Gasification Working Face

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Li

    (Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jian Liu

    (Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Lin Xin

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Wei Li

    (Shandong Energy Power Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jianguo Fan

    (Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xianmin Wang

    (Shandong Energy Power Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Yan Ma

    (Shandong Energy Power Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Weimin Cheng

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Jiancai Sui

    (Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Maofei Niu

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

Studying temperature evolution and distribution range during underground coal gasification is essential to optimize process efficiency, ensure safe and stable operation and reduce environmental impact. In this paper, based on the Liyan Coal Mine underground gasification project, the moving grid setting is used to simulate the moving heat transfer process of the underground coal gasification (UCG) flame working face (FWF). The results showed that the temperature distribution within the coal wall facing the flame is relatively narrow and remains concentrated within a limited range. Temperature distribution curves for T = 100 °C and T = 600 °C initially exhibit a nonlinear increase, reaching a maximum value, followed by a nonlinear decrease, ultimately trending towards a constant value. The maximum temperature influence ranges at ∆T = 10 °C (T = 30 °C) in the roof, left coal pillar, and floor are approximately 13.0 m, 9.0 m, and 10.1 m, respectively. The temperature values at the +1 m and +2 m positions on the roof exhibit a parabolic pattern, with the height and width of the temperature curve gradually increasing. By the end of the operation at t = 190 d, the length range of temperatures exceeding 600 °C at the +1 m position is 73 m, with a maximum temperature of approximately 825 °C, while at the +2 m position it is 31 m, with a maximum temperature of approximately 686 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Li & Jian Liu & Lin Xin & Wei Li & Jianguo Fan & Xianmin Wang & Yan Ma & Weimin Cheng & Jiancai Sui & Maofei Niu, 2025. "Numerical Simulation of Temperature Field Evolution and Distribution Range During Movement of Underground Coal Gasification Working Face," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:931-:d:1591767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Mathur, D.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2010. "Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2374-2386.
    2. Khadse, Anil & Qayyumi, Mohammed & Mahajani, Sanjay & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2007. "Underground coal gasification: A new clean coal utilization technique for India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2061-2071.
    3. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Jowkar, Amin & Sereshki, Farhang & Najafi, Mehdi, 2018. "A new model for evaluation of cavity shape and volume during Underground Coal Gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 756-765.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Prabu, V., 2015. "Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Zhen Dong & Haiyang Yi & Yufeng Zhao & Xinggang Wang & Tingxiang Chu & Junjie Xue & Hanqi Wu & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Hao Chen, 2022. "Investigation of the Evolution of Stratum Fracture during the Cavity Expansion of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal & Samar, Raza, 2019. "Prediction and parametric analysis of cavity growth for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1277-1290.
    5. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Sapru, R.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2011. "Laboratory studies on cavity growth and product gas composition in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1776-1784.
    6. Xin, Lin & An, Mingyu & Feng, Mingze & Li, Kaixuan & Cheng, Weimin & Liu, Weitao & Hu, Xiangming & Wang, Zhigang & Han, Limin, 2021. "Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lump coal in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Laboratory scale studies on simulated underground coal gasification of high ash coals for carbon-neutral power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358.
    9. Huijun Fang & Yuewu Liu & Tengze Ge & Taiyi Zheng & Yueyu Yu & Danlu Liu & Jiuge Ding & Longlong Li, 2022. "A Review of Research on Cavity Growth in the Context of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    11. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    12. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    13. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    14. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Mohammadreza Shahbazi & Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji, 2019. "On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 373-398, March.
    16. Gupta, Saurabh & De, Santanu, 2022. "An experimental investigation of high-ash coal gasification in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    17. Yufeng Zhao & Zhen Dong & Yanpeng Chen & Hao Chen & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Xinggang Wang & Lixin Jiao, 2023. "Physical Simulation Test of Underground Coal Gasification Cavity Evolution in the Horizontal Segment of U-Shaped Well," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Saulov, Dmitry N. & Plumb, Ovid A. & Klimenko, A.Y., 2010. "Flame propagation in a gasification channel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1264-1273.
    19. Zhong, Qiumeng & Zhang, Zhihe & Wang, Heming & Zhang, Xu & Wang, Yao & Wang, Peng & Ma, Fengmei & Yue, Qiang & Du, Tao & Chen, Wei-Qiang & Liang, Sai, 2023. "Incorporating scarcity into footprints reveals diverse supply chain hotspots for global fossil fuel management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    20. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:931-:d:1591767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.