IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1547-d1057485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Micro-Scale Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Two-Phase CO 2 –Brine Flow in a Tighter REV Extracted from a Permeable Sandstone Core: Implications for CO 2 Storage Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Yidi Wan

    (School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Chengzao Jia

    (PetroChina Company Ltd., Beijing 100011, China)

  • Wen Zhao

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lin Jiang

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhuxin Chen

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Deep saline permeable sandstones have the potential to serve as sites for CO 2 storage. However, unstable CO 2 storage in pores can be costly and harmful to the environment. In this study, we used lattice Boltzmann (LB) simulations to investigate the factors that affect steady-state CO 2 –brine imbibition flow in sandstone pores, with a focus on improving CO 2 storage efficiency in deep saline permeable sandstone aquifers. We extracted three representative element volumes (REVs) from a digital rock image of a sandstone core and selected a tighter REV in the upper subdomain so that its permeability would apparently be lower than that of the other two based on single-phase LB simulation for further analysis. The results of our steady-state LB simulations of CO 2 –brine imbibition processes in the tighter REV under four differential pressures showed that a threshold pressure gradient of around 0.5 MPa/m exists at a differential pressure of 200 Pa, and that higher differential pressures result in a greater and more linear pressure drop and stronger channelization after the flow are initiated. Furthermore, we conducted simulations over a range of target brine saturations in the tighter REV at the optimal differential pressure of 400 Pa. Our findings showed that the relative permeability of CO 2 is greatly reduced as the capillary number falls below a certain threshold, while the viscosity ratio has a smaller but still significant effect on relative permeability and storage efficiency through the lubrication effect. Wettability has a limited effect on the storage efficiency, but it does impact the relative permeability within the initial saturation range when the capillary number is low and the curves have not yet converged. Overall, these results provide micro-scale insights into the factors that affect CO 2 storage efficiency in sandstones.

Suggested Citation

  • Yidi Wan & Chengzao Jia & Wen Zhao & Lin Jiang & Zhuxin Chen, 2023. "Micro-Scale Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Two-Phase CO 2 –Brine Flow in a Tighter REV Extracted from a Permeable Sandstone Core: Implications for CO 2 Storage Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1547-:d:1057485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1547/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1547/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hatem Gasmi & Umair Khan & Aurang Zaib & Anuar Ishak & Sayed M. Eldin & Zehba Raizah, 2022. "Analysis of Mixed Convection on Two-Phase Nanofluid Flow Past a Vertical Plate in Brinkman-Extended Darcy Porous Medium with Nield Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Matos, Stelvia & Viardot, Eric & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Geels, Frank W. & Xiong, Yu, 2022. "Innovation and climate change: A review and introduction to the special issue," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Page, S.C. & Williamson, A.G. & Mason, I.G., 2009. "Carbon capture and storage: Fundamental thermodynamics and current technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3314-3324, September.
    4. Marina A. Christopoulou & Petros Koutsovitis & Nikolaos Kostoglou & Chrysothemis Paraskevopoulou & Alkiviadis Sideridis & Petros Petrounias & Aikaterini Rogkala & Sebastian Stock & Nikolaos Koukouzas, 2022. "Evaluation of the CO 2 Storage Capacity in Sandstone Formations from the Southeast Mesohellenic trough (Greece)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Paltsev, Sergey & Morris, Jennifer & Kheshgi, Haroon & Herzog, Howard, 2021. "Hard-to-Abate Sectors: The role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    6. Hou, Lianhua & Yu, Zhichao & Luo, Xia & Wu, Songtao, 2022. "Self-sealing of caprocks during CO2 geological sequestration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Tian, Zhiwei & Xing, Huilin & Tan, Yunliang & Gao, Jinfang, 2014. "A coupled lattice Boltzmann model for simulating reactive transport in CO2 injection," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 155-164.
    8. Liu, Quanyou & Zhu, Dongya & Jin, Zhijun & Tian, Hailong & Zhou, Bing & Jiang, Peixue & Meng, Qingqiang & Wu, Xiaoqi & Xu, Huiyuan & Hu, Ting & Zhu, Huixing, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage for long-term and safe sealing with constrained natural CO2 analogs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinjarapu, Sai Hema Bhavya & Neerup, Randi & Larsen, Anders Hellerup & Jørsboe, Jens Kristian & Villadsen, Sebastian Nis Bay & Jensen, Søren & Karlsson, Jakob Lindkvist & Kappel, Jannik & Lassen, Henr, 2024. "Results from pilot-scale CO2 capture testing using 30 wt% MEA at a Waste-to-Energy facility: Optimisation through parametric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    3. Xu, Jin & Liu, Chengjun & Dou, Gang & Cai, Yunfei, 2024. "Mineral resource management in Chinese rural areas: Policy assessment for green economic growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Zhang, Minkai & Guo, Yincheng, 2013. "Rate based modeling of absorption and regeneration for CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-152.
    5. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Shenghao Feng & Xiujian Peng & Philip Adams, 2021. "Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-318, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    7. Tao, Huayu & Qian, Xi & Zhou, Yi & Cheng, Hongfei, 2022. "Research progress of clay minerals in carbon dioxide capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Maxwell Brown & Matthew Irish & Daniel Steinberg & Tamar Moss & Daniel P. Cherney & Travis Shultz & David Morgan & Alexander Zoelle & Thomas Schmitt, 2024. "Representing Carbon Dioxide Transport and Storage Network Investments within Power System Planning Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Miao, Yuang & Lu, Huixia & Cui, Shizhang & Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Yusheng & Song, Xinwang & Cheng, Haiying, 2024. "CO2 emissions change in Tianjin: The driving factors and the role of CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    10. Beccarello, Massimo & Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2023. "Meeting decarbonization targets: Techno-economic insights from the Italian scenario," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2.
    11. Sterkhov, K.V. & Khokhlov, D.A. & Zaichenko, M.N., 2024. "Zero carbon emission CCGT power plant with integrated solid fuel gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    12. Gunawan, Tubagus Aryandi & Luo, Hongxi & Greig, Chris & Larson, Eric, 2024. "Shared CO₂ capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    13. Paltsev, Sergey & Gurgel, Angelo & Morris, Jennifer & Chen, Henry & Dey, Subhrajit & Marwah, Sumita, 2022. "Economic analysis of the hard-to-abate sectors in India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2023. "Review and Perspectives of Key Decarbonization Drivers to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.
    16. Hind Barghash & Zuhoor AlRashdi & Kenneth E. Okedu & Peter Desmond, 2022. "Life-Cycle Assessment Study for Bio-Hydrogen Gas Production from Sewage Treatment Plants Using Solar PVs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Alberto Maria Gambelli, 2023. "CCUS Strategies as Most Viable Option for Global Warming Mitigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-4, May.
    18. Bukar, Ahmed M. & Asif, Muhammad, 2024. "Technology readiness level assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Decarbonization of cement production in a hydrogen economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    20. Kawai, Eiji & Ozawa, Akito & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2022. "Role of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) for decarbonization of industrial sector: A case study of Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1547-:d:1057485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.