IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7555-d1279270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Emission Reduction Mechanism of High-Tiered Carbon Tax under Green and Low Carbon Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Min Fu

    (Research Institute of Carbon Neutralization Development, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Wensong Wu

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Lixin Tian

    (Research Institute of Carbon Neutralization Development, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, Ministry of Education, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Zaili Zhen

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, Ministry of Education, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Jing Ye

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

This article studies the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes under green and low-carbon behavior in single and two-stage supply chains. First, based on the Cournot game model, it explores the impact of high-tiered carbon tax policies on supply chain carbon reduction decisions in the green exchange market. By analyzing the effects of implementing a high-tiered carbon tax policy, the basic characteristics of its implementation are identified, and the advantages of a high-tiered carbon tax compared to a unified carbon tax are summarized. Second, it establishes a carbon reduction technology investment cost-sharing model and a carbon tax cost-sharing model under the high-tiered carbon tax policy. It analyzes and studies the impact of high-tiered carbon tax policies on balancing the relationship between members of the two-level supply chain through optimal decision-making of the two-level supply chain under two cost-sharing strategies, revealing the emission reduction mechanism of the two-level supply chain under high-tiered carbon tax policies. The results indicate that there are extreme points in the emission reduction rates of producers in the green exchange market under both the high-tiered carbon tax policy and the unified carbon tax policy. It shows that the two cost-sharing strategies can effectively alleviate the cost burden for producers, increase their marginal profits, and promote further improvement in emission reduction. It explores the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes and future research should delve into the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes in different carbon emission departments and regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Fu & Wensong Wu & Lixin Tian & Zaili Zhen & Jing Ye, 2023. "Analysis of Emission Reduction Mechanism of High-Tiered Carbon Tax under Green and Low Carbon Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7555-:d:1279270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    2. Matthew J. Kotchen, 2003. "Impure Public Goods and the Comparative Statics of Environmentally Friendly Consumption," Department of Economics Working Papers 2003-06, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    3. Gary H. Chao & Seyed M. R. Iravani & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1138, July.
    4. de Miguel, Carlos & Manzano, Baltasar, 2011. "Gradual green tax reforms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(S1), pages 50-58.
    5. Jianhong He & Yaling Lei & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Xiaowo, 2010. "Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1269-1279, December.
    7. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    8. Florian Landis & Sebastian Rausch & Mirjam Kosch, 2018. "Differentiated Carbon Prices and the Economic Cost of Decarbonization," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 483-516, June.
    9. Kotchen, Matthew J., 2005. "Impure public goods and the comparative statics of environmentally friendly consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 281-300, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chengling Hu & Hao Bai & Wei Li & Kaigui Xie & Yipeng Liu & Tong Liu & Changzheng Shao, 2024. "Optimal Scheduling of Networked Microgrids Considering the Temporal Equilibrium Allocation of Annual Carbon Emission Allowance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunhai Yu & Yingxiang Zhang & Ling Liu & Thomas W. Archibald, 2024. "Low-carbon supply chain strategy and contract coordination considering manufacturers′ fairness concerns," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-51, December.
    2. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Guo Fuli & Cyril Foropon & Ma Xin, 2022. "Reducing carbon emissions in humanitarian supply chain: the role of decision making and coordination," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 355-377, December.
    4. Zhang, Xuefeng & Li, Zhe & Li, Guo, 2024. "Grandfather-based or benchmark-based: Strategy choice for carbon quota allocation methods in the carbon neutrality era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Lei Yang & Meng Chen & Yiji Cai & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2018. "Manufacturer’s Decision as Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference Grows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Xiaoli Zhang & Guoyi Xiu & Fakhar Shahzad & Caiquan Duan, 2021. "The Impact of Equity Financing on the Performance of Capital-Constrained Supply Chain under Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Han, Xiaoya & Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2023. "A dynamic model considering consumer green awareness and environmental subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Delgado, Michael S. & Khanna, Neha, 2015. "Voluntary Pollution Abatement and Regulation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Avinadav, Tal & Levy, Priel, 2023. "The effect of an uncertain commission rate on the decisions of a capital-constrained developer," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 11(C).
    10. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Valeria Costantini & Susanna Mancinelli & Massimilano Corradini, 2011. "Environmental and Innovation Performance in a Dynamic Impure Public Good Framework," Working Papers 201117, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    11. Cecere, Grazia & Mancinelli, Susanna & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2014. "Waste prevention and social preferences: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 163-176.
    12. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    14. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    15. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Alistair Munro & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Green Goods: Are They Good or Bad News for the Environment? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment on Impure Public Goods," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(2), pages 317-335, October.
    17. He, Yi & Wang, Hang & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Qingyun, 2019. "Coordination through cooperative advertising in a two-period consumer electronics supply chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 179-188.
    18. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Karen Pittel & Dirk Rübbelke, 2011. "Characteristics of Terrorism," Chapters, in: Derek L. Braddon & Keith Hartley (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Conflict, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Asche, Frank & Larsen, Thomas A. & Smith, Martin D. & Sogn-Grundvåg, Geir & Young, James A., 2015. "Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 82-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7555-:d:1279270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.