IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i8p2921-d795051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helianthus salicifolius as a New Biomass Source for Biogas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru Peni

    (Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Marcin Dębowski

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska 117, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Mariusz J. Stolarski

    (Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Renewable energy is becoming a widely discussed topic in the European Union (EU), due to a desire to reduce the negative effects of fossil fuels on climate change and biodiversity. About 60% of the total renewable energy produced in the EU is derived from biomass. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an important pathway to convert biomass into biogas and then into bioenergy. Helianthus salicifolius is a perennial plant, whose biomass can serve as a co-substrate in biogas plants. Biomass composition, in addition to the biomethane and biogas potential, were investigated in raw green biomass and silage obtained from Helianthus salicifolius plants grown under different types (mineral and organic) and doses (0, 85, 170 kg N ha −1 ) of nitrogen fertilization. The biomethane production efficiency from Helianthus salicifolius was recorded for 25 days and found to range on average between 169.4 NL kg −1 VS for raw biomass and 193.2 NL kg −1 VS for silage. It follows from the current study that ensiling increases substrate digestibility and has a positive impact on methane concentration, but the biomethane and biogas production outputs from those substrates did not differ significantly at the end of the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru Peni & Marcin Dębowski & Mariusz J. Stolarski, 2022. "Helianthus salicifolius as a New Biomass Source for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2921-:d:795051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz, 2021. "The Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Methanogenesis in the Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Marcin Dębowski & Marta Kisielewska & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Aleksandra Rudnicka & Magda Dudek & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Marcin Zieliński, 2020. "The effects of Microalgae Biomass Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from the Common Agricultural Biogas Plants Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Ma, Shuaishuai & Wang, Hongliang & Li, Jingxue & Fu, Yu & Zhu, Wanbin, 2019. "Methane production performances of different compositions in lignocellulosic biomass through anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dubis, Bogdan & Budzyński, Wojciech Stefan & Bórawski, Piotr & Bułkowska, Katarzyna, 2016. "Energy efficiency of crops grown for biogas production in a large-scale farm in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 277-286.
    5. Harshita Singh & Sakshi Tomar & Kamal A. Qureshi & Mariusz Jaremko & Pankaj K. Rai, 2022. "Recent Advances in Biomass Pretreatment Technologies for Biohydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    7. Marcin Zieliński & Paulina Rusanowska & Aleksandra Krzywik & Magda Dudek & Anna Nowicka & Marcin Dębowski, 2019. "Application of Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Improving Methane Fermentation of Sida hermaphrodita Silage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, February.
    8. Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Growth Potential of Yellow Mealworm Reared on Industrial Residues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Peni, Dumitru & Dębowski, Marcin, 2022. "Biogas potential of cup plant and willow-leaf sunflower biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dubis, Bogdan & Sokólski, Mateusz Mikołaj & Załuski, Dariusz & Bórawski, Piotr & Szempliński, Władysław, 2019. "Biomass yield and energy balance of Virginia fanpetals in different production technologies in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 612-623.
    2. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Olba-Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "Energy efficiency of Silphium perfoliatum and Helianthus salicifolius biomass production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Kołodziej, Barbara & Dubis, Bogdan & Sugier, Danuta & Antonkiewicz, Jacek & Szatkowski, Artur, 2023. "The effect of sewage sludge on the energy balance of cup plant biomass production. A six-year field experiment in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dubis, Bogdan & Kozak, Marcin, 2021. "Sewage sludge and the energy balance of Jerusalem artichoke production - A case study in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Kwiatkowski, Jacek & Graban, Łukasz & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2023. "The energy efficiency of Virginia fanpetals biomass production for solid biofuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Dubis, Bogdan & Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Załuski, Dariusz & Sokólski, Mateusz, 2020. "The effect of sewage sludge fertilization on the biomass yield of giant miscanthus and the energy balance of the production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Peni, Dumitru & Dębowski, Marcin, 2022. "Biogas potential of cup plant and willow-leaf sunflower biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    9. Hegazy Rezk & A. G. Olabi & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Abdul Hai Alami & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Optimal Parameter Determination of Membrane Bioreactor to Boost Biohydrogen Production-Based Integration of ANFIS Modeling and Honey Badger Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Alvydas Zagorskis & Regimantas Dauknys & Mantas Pranskevičius & Olha Khliestova, 2023. "Research on Biogas Yield from Macroalgae with Inoculants at Different Organic Loading Rates in a Three-Stage Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    12. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    13. Dawid Szwarc & Anna Nowicka & Katarzyna Głowacka, 2022. "Cross-Comparison of the Impact of Grass Silage Pulsed Electric Field and Microwave-Induced Disintegration on Biogas Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-10, July.
    14. Enrique Salgado-Hernández & Ángel Isauro Ortiz-Ceballos & Sergio Martínez-Hernández & Erik Samuel Rosas-Mendoza & Ana Elena Dorantes-Acosta & Andrea Alvarado-Vallejo & Alejandro Alvarado-Lassman, 2022. "Methane Production of Sargassum spp. Biomass from the Mexican Caribbean: Solid–Liquid Separation and Component Distribution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Li, Pengfei & Cheng, Chongbo & Guo, Rui & Yu, Ran & Jiao, Youzhou & Shen, Dekui & He, Chao, 2022. "Interactions among the components of artificial biomass during their anaerobic digestion with and without sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    16. Zhu, Chaoyang & Wang, Mengxia & Guo, Mengxing & Deng, Jinxin & Du, Qipei & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Yunxiang & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "An innovative process design and multi-criteria study/optimization of a biomass digestion-supercritical carbon dioxide scenario toward boosting a geothermal-driven cogeneration system for power and he," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    17. Mamata Singhvi & Smita Zinjarde & Beom-Soo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Strategies for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Materials into Biohydrogen: Challenges and Solutions toward Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Adamu, Haruna & Bello, Usman & Yuguda, Abubakar Umar & Tafida, Usman Ibrahim & Jalam, Abdullahi Mohammad & Sabo, Ahmed & Qamar, Mohammad, 2023. "Production processes, techno-economic and policy challenges of bioenergy production from fruit and vegetable wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Kwiatkowski, Jacek & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan, 2018. "Energy and economic efficiency of camelina and crambe biomass production on a large-scale farm in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 770-780.
    20. Ramprakash, Balasubramani & Lindblad, Peter & Eaton-Rye, Julian J. & Incharoensakdi, Aran, 2022. "Current strategies and future perspectives in biological hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2921-:d:795051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.