IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2186-d353138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of Microalgae Biomass Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from the Common Agricultural Biogas Plants Feedstock

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Dębowski

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Marta Kisielewska

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Joanna Kazimierowicz

    (Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Rudnicka

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Magda Dudek

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda

    (Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha St. 12/13, 90-237 Lodz, Poland)

  • Marcin Zieliński

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects on methane production of the addition of microalgae biomass of Arthrospira platensis and Platymonas subcordiformis to the common feedstock used in agricultural biogas plants (cattle manure, maize silage). Anaerobic biodegradability tests were carried out using respirometric reactors operated at an initial organic loading rate of 5.0 kg volatile solids (VS)/m 3 , temperature of 35°C, and a retention time of 20 days. A systematic increase in the biogas production efficiency was found, where the ratio of microalgae biomass in the feedstock increased from 0% to 40% (%VS). Higher microalgae biomass ratio did not have a significant impact on improving the efficiency of biogas production, and the biogas production remained at a level comparable with 40% share of microalgae biomass in the feedstock. This was probably related to the carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio decrease in the mixture of substrates. The use of Platymonas subcordiformis ensured higher biogas production, with the maximum value of 1058.8 ± 25.2 L/kg VS. The highest content of methane, at an average concentration of 65.6% in the biogas produced, was observed in setups with Arthrospira plantensis biomass added at a concentration of between 20%–40% to the feedstock mixture.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Dębowski & Marta Kisielewska & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Aleksandra Rudnicka & Magda Dudek & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Marcin Zieliński, 2020. "The effects of Microalgae Biomass Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from the Common Agricultural Biogas Plants Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2186-:d:353138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goyal, H.B. & Seal, Diptendu & Saxena, R.C., 2008. "Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 504-517, February.
    2. Singh, Jasvinder & Gu, Sai, 2010. "Commercialization potential of microalgae for biofuels production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2596-2610, December.
    3. James J. Elser & William F. Fagan & Robert F. Denno & Dean R. Dobberfuhl & Ayoola Folarin & Andrea Huberty & Sebastian Interlandi & Susan S. Kilham & Edward McCauley & Kimberly L. Schulz & Evan H. Sie, 2000. "Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6812), pages 578-580, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Nsair & Senem Onen Cinar & Ayah Alassali & Hani Abu Qdais & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Dumitru Peni & Marcin Dębowski & Mariusz J. Stolarski, 2022. "Helianthus salicifolius as a New Biomass Source for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Alvydas Zagorskis & Regimantas Dauknys & Mantas Pranskevičius & Olha Khliestova, 2023. "Research on Biogas Yield from Macroalgae with Inoculants at Different Organic Loading Rates in a Three-Stage Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Anna Nowicka & Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Magda Dudek, 2021. "Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dębowski, Marcin & Zieliński, Marcin & Grala, Anna & Dudek, Magda, 2013. "Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 596-604.
    2. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    3. Ankita Juneja & Ruben Michael Ceballos & Ganti S. Murthy, 2013. "Effects of Environmental Factors and Nutrient Availability on the Biochemical Composition of Algae for Biofuels Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-32, September.
    4. Tijani, Hamzat & Abdullah, Norhayati & Yuzir, Ali, 2015. "Integration of microalgae biomass in biomethanation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1610-1622.
    5. Aboagye, D. & Banadda, N. & Kiggundu, N. & Kabenge, I., 2017. "Assessment of orange peel waste availability in ghana and potential bio-oil yield using fast pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 814-821.
    6. Hailiang Li & M. James C. Crabbe & Haikui Chen, 2020. "History and Trends in Ecological Stoichiometry Research from 1992 to 2019: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Marietta Markiewicz & Łukasz Muślewski, 2019. "The Impact of Powering an Engine with Fuels from Renewable Energy Sources including its Software Modification on a Drive Unit Performance Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Rahman, Syed Masiur & Khondaker, A.N., 2012. "Mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon capture and storage in Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2446-2460.
    10. Maity, Jyoti Prakash & Hou, Chia-Peng & Majumder, Dip & Bundschuh, Jochen & Kulp, Thomas R. & Chen, Chien-Yen & Chuang, Lu-Te & Nathan Chen, Ching-Nen & Jean, Jiin-Shuh & Yang, Tsui-Chu & Chen, Chien-, 2014. "The production of biofuel and bioelectricity associated with wastewater treatment by green algae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 94-103.
    11. Zane Vincevica-Gaile & Varvara Sachpazidou & Valdis Bisters & Maris Klavins & Olga Anne & Inga Grinfelde & Emil Hanc & William Hogland & Muhammad Asim Ibrahim & Yahya Jani & Mait Kriipsalu & Divya Pal, 2022. "Applying Macroalgal Biomass as an Energy Source: Utility of the Baltic Sea Beach Wrack for Thermochemical Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Qi, Jianhui & Zhao, Jianli & Xu, Yang & Wang, Yongjia & Han, Kuihua, 2018. "Segmented heating carbonization of biomass: Yields, property and estimation of heating value of chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 301-311.
    13. Law, Tony & Zhang, Weitao & Zhao, Jingyang & Arhonditsis, George B., 2009. "Structural changes in lake functioning induced from nutrient loading and climate variability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(7), pages 979-997.
    14. Fernanda Pereira Martins & Fabio Avila Rodrigues & Marcio Jose Silva, 2018. "Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 -Catalyzed Levulinic Acid Esterification: Production of Fuel Bioadditives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    15. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    16. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    17. Sahoo, Abhisek & Kumar, Sachin & Mohanty, Kaustubha, 2021. "Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of Putranjiva roxburghii (putranjiva) and Cassia fistula (amaltas) non-edible oilseeds using thermogravimetric analyzer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 261-277.
    18. Kim, Tae-Hyoung & Lee, Kyungho & Oh, Baek-Rock & Lee, Mi-Eun & Seo, Minji & Li, Sheng & Kim, Jae-Kon & Choi, Minkee & Chang, Yong Keun, 2021. "A novel process for the coproduction of biojet fuel and high-value polyunsaturated fatty acid esters from heterotrophic microalgae Schizochytrium sp. ABC101," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 481-490.
    19. Nair, Sujith & Paulose, Hanna, 2014. "Emergence of green business models: The case of algae biofuel for aviation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 175-184.
    20. Ghulam Mujtaba & Rifat Hayat & Qaiser Hussain & Mukhtar Ahmed, 2021. "Physio-Chemical Characterization of Biochar, Compost and Co-Composted Biochar Derived from Green Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2186-:d:353138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.