IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5122-d862616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Comparison of the Impact of Grass Silage Pulsed Electric Field and Microwave-Induced Disintegration on Biogas Production Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Dawid Szwarc

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Anna Nowicka

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Głowacka

    (Department of Plant Physiology, Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass is included in the group of renewable energy sources. Its calorific value is high, owing to which it can be successfully used in the production of second-generation fuels, e.g., biogas. However, its complex structure makes it necessary to apply a pretreatment in order to increase the biogas output. This study presents the usability of a pulsed electric field in grass silage pretreatment in methane fermentation and compares it with microwave-induced disintegration. The experiment shows that substrate disintegration with a pulsed electric field (PEF) results in an increase in methane output. The productivity of methane from PEF pretreatment silage increased by 20.1% compared to the untreated control. The application of microwave disintegration, with the assumption that the same energy is used for the pretreatment, resulted in a methane output increase of 6% compared to the control. The highest biogas production output in PEF-pretreated samples was 535.57 NL/kg VS, while the highest biogas output from substrates pretreated with microwaves was 487.18 NL/kg VS.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawid Szwarc & Anna Nowicka & Katarzyna Głowacka, 2022. "Cross-Comparison of the Impact of Grass Silage Pulsed Electric Field and Microwave-Induced Disintegration on Biogas Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-10, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5122-:d:862616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawid Szwarc & Katarzyna Głowacka, 2021. "Increasing the Biogas Potential of Rapeseed Straw Using Pulsed Electric Field Pre-Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Gomes, Michelle Garcia & Paranhos, Aline Gomes de Oliveira & Camargos, Adonai Bruneli & Baêta, Bruno Eduardo Lobo & Baffi, Milla Alves & Gurgel, Leandro Vinícius Alves & Pasquini, Daniel, 2022. "Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with dilute citric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis: Use of black liquor and solid fraction for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 428-438.
    3. Haghighi Mood, Sohrab & Hossein Golfeshan, Amir & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Salehi Jouzani, Gholamreza & Najafi, Gholam Hassan & Gholami, Mehdi & Ardjmand, Mehdi, 2013. "Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 77-93.
    4. Dawid Szwarc & Karolina Szwarc, 2020. "Use of a Pulsed Electric Field to Improve the Biogas Potential of Maize Silage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Anna Nowicka & Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Magda Dudek, 2021. "Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Marcin Zieliński & Paulina Rusanowska & Aleksandra Krzywik & Magda Dudek & Anna Nowicka & Marcin Dębowski, 2019. "Application of Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Improving Methane Fermentation of Sida hermaphrodita Silage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahu, Omprakash, 2021. "Appropriateness of rose (Rosa hybrida) for bioethanol conversion with enzymatic hydrolysis: Sustainable development on green fuel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Park, Jonghyun & Yim, Jun Ho & Cho, Seong-Heon & Jung, Sungyup & Tsang, Yiu Fai & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Jeon, Young Jae & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2024. "A virtuous cycle for thermal treatment of polyvinyl chloride and fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    3. Dawid Szwarc & Katarzyna Głowacka, 2021. "Increasing the Biogas Potential of Rapeseed Straw Using Pulsed Electric Field Pre-Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Vinícius P. Shibukawa & Lucas Ramos & Mónica M. Cruz-Santos & Carina A. Prado & Fanny M. Jofre & Gabriel L. de Arruda & Silvio S. da Silva & Solange I. Mussatto & Júlio C. dos Santos, 2023. "Impact of Product Diversification on the Economic Sustainability of Second-Generation Ethanol Biorefineries: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    7. Song, Younho & Cho, Eun Jin & Park, Chan Song & Oh, Chi Hoon & Park, Bok-Jae & Bae, Hyeun-Jong, 2019. "A strategy for sequential fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis in bioethanol production from hardwoods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1281-1289.
    8. Rooni, Vahur & Raud, Merlin & Kikas, Timo, 2017. "The freezing pre-treatment of lignocellulosic material: A cheap alternative for Nordic countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-7.
    9. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.
    10. Mhatre, Apurv & Kalscheur, Bethany & Mckeown, Haley & Bhakta, Karan & Sarnaik, Aditya P. & Flores, Andrew & Nielsen, David R. & Wang, Xuan & Soundappan, Thiagarajan & Varman, Arul M., 2022. "Consolidated bioprocessing of hemicellulose to fuels and chemicals through an engineered Bacillus subtilis-Escherichia coli consortium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 288-298.
    11. Borujeni, Nasim Espah & Karimi, Keikhosro & Denayer, Joeri F.M. & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Apple pomace biorefinery for ethanol, mycoprotein, and value-added biochemicals production by Mucor indicus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Adamu, Haruna & Bello, Usman & Yuguda, Abubakar Umar & Tafida, Usman Ibrahim & Jalam, Abdullahi Mohammad & Sabo, Ahmed & Qamar, Mohammad, 2023. "Production processes, techno-economic and policy challenges of bioenergy production from fruit and vegetable wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Alkasrawi, Malek & Al-Othman, Amani & Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Doncan, Shona & Gurram, Raghu & Singsaas, Eric & Almomani, Fares & Al-Asheh, Sameer, 2021. "A novel technique of paper mill sludge conversion to bioethanol toward sustainable energy production: Effect of fiber recovery on the saccharification hydrolysis and fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Jeong, Hanseob & Lee, Jaejung & Ju, Young Min & Lee, Soo Min, 2019. "Using electro-coagulation treatment to remove phenolic compounds and furan derivatives in hydrolysates resulting from pilot-scale supercritical water hydrolysis of Mongolian oak," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 971-979.
    15. Siqueira, Marcos Rechi & Reginatto, Valeria, 2015. "Inhibition of fermentative H2 production by hydrolysis byproducts of lignocellulosic substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 109-116.
    16. Wu, Bo & Wang, Yan-Wei & Dai, Yong-Hua & Song, Chao & Zhu, Qi-Li & Qin, Han & Tan, Fu-Rong & Chen, Han-Cheng & Dai, Li-Chun & Hu, Guo-Quan & He, Ming-Xiong, 2021. "Current status and future prospective of bio-ethanol industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Almohammed, Fouad & Mhemdi, Houcine & Vorobiev, Eugène, 2016. "Pulsed electric field treatment of sugar beet tails as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 49-57.
    18. Lee, Ilgyu & Yu, Ju-Hyun, 2021. "Design of hydrothermal and subsequent lime pretreatment for fermentable sugar and bioethanol production from acacia wood," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 170-177.
    19. Yusri, I.M. & Mamat, R. & Najafi, G. & Razman, A. & Awad, Omar I. & Azmi, W.H. & Ishak, W.F.W. & Shaiful, A.I.M., 2017. "Alcohol based automotive fuels from first four alcohol family in compression and spark ignition engine: A review on engine performance and exhaust emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 169-181.
    20. Halder, Pobitra & Kundu, Sazal & Patel, Savankumar & Setiawan, Adi & Atkin, Rob & Parthasarthy, Rajarathinam & Paz-Ferreiro, Jorge & Surapaneni, Aravind & Shah, Kalpit, 2019. "Progress on the pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass employing ionic liquids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 268-292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5122-:d:862616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.