IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipes0360544221026104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood

Author

Listed:
  • Karami, Kavosh
  • Karimi, Keikhosro
  • Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora
  • Kumar, Rajeev

Abstract

Biological pretreatments and their combination with chemical and physical pretreatments are among the inexpensive methods for the improvement of biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. In this study, mesophilic aerobic digestion was studied as a biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from pinewood. Its effects in combination with other pretreatments, i.e., liquid hot water (LHW), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and ultrasonic pretreatments, were also investigated. LHW and Alkali (using 8% w/w NaOH) pretreatments were performed at less severe conditions (100 °C for 10 min) to evaluate the synergistic effect of these thermochemical pretreatments on biogas production. The ultrasonic pretreatment was performed at 40 KHz for 30 min at 40 °C. Biological pretreatment was carried out using aerobic sludge at 37 °C for 10 days. The aerobic digestion was the only pretreatment that could individually improve the methane yield from pinewood by 7.3 folds. However, the highest methane yield (57.7 mL/g VS of pretreated pinewood) was obtained by the combination of NaOH, biological, and ultrasonic pretreatments, which was 11.2 folds higher than that of the untreated substrate. It was concluded that the pretreatment with aerobic digestion could significantly improve the biogas production yield, especially in combination with mild thermo-chemical pretreatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pe:s0360544221026104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221026104
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mischopoulou, M. & Naidis, P. & Kalamaras, S. & Kotsopoulos, T.A. & Samaras, P., 2016. "Effect of ultrasonic and ozonation pretreatment on methane production potential of raw molasses wastewater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB), pages 1078-1085.
    2. Zhou, Shuxia & Zhang, Yulin & Dong, Yuping, 2012. "Pretreatment for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation of mixed corn stover and cow dung," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 644-648.
    3. Yu, Qiong & Liu, Ronghou & Li, Kun & Ma, Ruijie, 2019. "A review of crop straw pretreatment methods for biogas production by anaerobic digestion in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 51-58.
    4. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T. & Kumar, R., 2012. "Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 273-282.
    5. Ma, Shuaishuai & Wang, Hongliang & Li, Jingxue & Fu, Yu & Zhu, Wanbin, 2019. "Methane production performances of different compositions in lignocellulosic biomass through anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Sues, Anna & Juraščík, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof, 2010. "Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 996-1007.
    7. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Shafiei, Marzieh & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2016. "Biogas and bioethanol production from pinewood pre-treated with steam explosion and N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO): A comparative life cycle assessment approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 935-950.
    8. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melts, Indrek & Heinsoo, Katrin & Nurk, Liina & Pärn, Linnar, 2013. "Comparison of two different bioenergy production options from late harvested biomass of Estonian semi-natural grasslands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 6-12.
    2. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Adamu, Haruna & Bello, Usman & Yuguda, Abubakar Umar & Tafida, Usman Ibrahim & Jalam, Abdullahi Mohammad & Sabo, Ahmed & Qamar, Mohammad, 2023. "Production processes, techno-economic and policy challenges of bioenergy production from fruit and vegetable wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Xiao He & Lianjun Wang & Anthony Lau, 2020. "Investigation of Steam Treatment on the Sorption Behavior of Rice Straw Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-9, October.
    5. Hassan, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Umar, Muhammad & Hei, Kunlun & Bi, Jinhua & Shi, Zhendan, 2017. "Methane enhancement and asynchronism minimization through co-digestion of goose manure and NaOH solubilized corn stover with waste activated sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1256-1263.
    6. Dong, Feiqing & Lu, Jianbo, 2013. "Using solar energy to enhance biogas production from livestock residue – A case study of the Tongren biogas engineering pig farm in South China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 759-765.
    7. Ma, Shuaishuai & Li, Yuling & Li, Jingxue & Yu, Xiaona & Cui, Zongjun & Yuan, Xufeng & Zhu, Wanbin & Wang, Hongliang, 2022. "Features of single and combined technologies for lignocellulose pretreatment to enhance biomethane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Patrycja Pochwatka & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Piotr Sołowiej & Agnieszka Wawrzyniak & Jacek Dach, 2020. "Biogas Plant Exploitation in a Middle-Sized Dairy Farm in Poland: Energetic and Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Zhou, Jialiang & Qu, Anan & Ming, Siqi & Zhang, Yuanhui & Duan, Na, 2022. "Binary-component anaerobic co-digestion: Synergies and microbial profiles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 1-10.
    10. Khatri, Shailendra & Wu, Shubiao & Kizito, Simon & Zhang, Wanqin & Li, Jiaxi & Dong, Renjie, 2015. "Synergistic effect of alkaline pretreatment and Fe dosing on batch anaerobic digestion of maize straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 55-64.
    11. Krishania, M. & Vijay, V.K. & Chandra, R., 2013. "Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 359-367.
    12. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    13. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    14. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    15. Siswo Sumardiono & Bakti Jos & Agata Advensia Eksa Dewanti & Isa Mahendra & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Biogas Production from Coffee Pulp and Chicken Feathers Using Liquid- and Solid-State Anaerobic Digestions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    17. Peters, Jens F. & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Dufour, Javier, 2015. "Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 325-336.
    18. Zhang, Huaiwen & Yao, Yiqing & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Jian-Li & Qiu, Yaojing & Li, Guofu & Liu, Jian, 2022. "Hydrogen production via anaerobic digestion of coal modified by white-rot fungi and its application benefits analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Vitasari, Caecilia R. & Jurascik, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2011. "Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3825-3837.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pe:s0360544221026104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.