IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p969-d1025808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Biogas Yield from Macroalgae with Inoculants at Different Organic Loading Rates in a Three-Stage Bioreactor

Author

Listed:
  • Alvydas Zagorskis

    (Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Regimantas Dauknys

    (Department of Environmental Protection and Water Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Mantas Pranskevičius

    (Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Olha Khliestova

    (Department of Primary Science Institute of Modern Technologies, Pryazovskyi State Technical University, 87555 Mariupol, Ukraine)

Abstract

Macroalgae can be a viable alternative to replace fossil fuels that have a negative impact on the environment. By mixing macroalgae with other substrates, higher quality biogas can be obtained. Such biogas is considered one of the most promising solutions for reducing climate change. In the work, new studies were conducted, during which biogas yield was investigated in a three-stage bioreactor (TSB) during the anaerobic digestion of Cladophora glomerata macroalgae with inoculants from cattle manure and sewage sludge at different organic loading rates (OLR). By choosing the optimal OLR in this way, the goal was to increase the energy potential of biomass. The research was performed at OLRs of 2.87, 4.06, and 8.13 Kg VS/m 3 d. After conducting research, the highest biogas yield was determined when OLR was 2.87 Kg VS/m 3 d. With this OLR, the average biogas yield was 439.0 ± 4.0 L/Kg VS added , and the methane yield was 306.5 ± 9.2 L CH 4 /Kg VS added . After increasing the OLR to 4.06 and 8.13 Kg VS/m 3 d, the yield of biogas and methane decreased by 1.55 times. The higher yield was due to better decomposition of elements C, N, H, and S during the fermentation process when OLR was 2.87 Kg VS/m 3 d. At different OLRs, the methane concentration remained high and varied from 68% to 80%. The highest biomass energy potential with a value of 3.05 kWh/Kg VS added was determined when the OLR was 2.87 Kg VS/m 3 d. This biomass energy potential was determined by the high yield of biogas and methane in TSB.

Suggested Citation

  • Alvydas Zagorskis & Regimantas Dauknys & Mantas Pranskevičius & Olha Khliestova, 2023. "Research on Biogas Yield from Macroalgae with Inoculants at Different Organic Loading Rates in a Three-Stage Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:969-:d:1025808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruling Yuan & Jun Pu & Dan Wu & Qingbai Wu & Taoli Huhe & Tingzhou Lei & Yong Chen, 2022. "Research Priorities and Trends on Bioenergy: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Marcin Dębowski & Marta Kisielewska & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Aleksandra Rudnicka & Magda Dudek & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Marcin Zieliński, 2020. "The effects of Microalgae Biomass Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from the Common Agricultural Biogas Plants Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun, 2019. "Life-cycle assessment of biohythane production via two-stage anaerobic fermentation from microalgae and food waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 395-410.
    4. Yongchuan Chen & Qiao Chen & Degang Zhang & Li Tang, 2022. "Variation in Sediment Available-Phosphorus in Dianchi Lake and Its Impacts on Algal Growth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Montingelli, M.E. & Tedesco, S. & Olabi, A.G., 2015. "Biogas production from algal biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 961-972.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vadim Burko & Alvydas Zagorskis & Nelli Elistratova & Olha Khliestova & Jaunius Urbonavičius & Vladimir Monin, 2024. "Assessment of the Seasonal Potential of Macroalgae and Grass in the Sea of Azov for Methanogenesis and Optimization of the Digestate’s Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Regimantas Dauknys & Aušra Mažeikienė, 2023. "Process Improvement of Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge Applying Iron Oxides-Based Additives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meraz, M. & Castilla, P. & Vernon-Carter, E.J. & Alvarez-Ramirez, J., 2024. "Biogas production modeling: Developing a logistic equation satisfying the zero initial condition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).
    2. Abdullah Nsair & Senem Onen Cinar & Ayah Alassali & Hani Abu Qdais & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Sánchez-Bayo, Alejandra & López-Chicharro, Daniel & Morales, Victoria & Espada, Juan José & Puyol, Daniel & Martínez, Fernando & Astals, Sergi & Vicente, Gemma & Bautista, Luis Fernando & Rodríguez, R, 2020. "Biodiesel and biogas production from Isochrysis galbana using dry and wet lipid extraction: A biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 188-195.
    4. Hussain, Fida & Shah, Syed Z. & Ahmad, Habib & Abubshait, Samar A. & Abubshait, Haya A. & Laref, A. & Manikandan, A. & Kusuma, Heri S. & Iqbal, Munawar, 2021. "Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: Biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Zhiwen Zhou & Yiming Lai & Qin Peng & Jun Li, 2021. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Merging Recycling Methods for Spent Lithium Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Bai, Xue & Lant, Paul A. & Jensen, Paul D. & Astals, Sergi & Pratt, Steven, 2016. "Enhanced methane production from algal digestion using free nitrous acid pre-treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 383-390.
    7. Ding, Lingkan & Chan Gutierrez, Enrique & Cheng, Jun & Xia, Ao & O'Shea, Richard & Guneratnam, Amita Jacob & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Assessment of continuous fermentative hydrogen and methane co-production using macro- and micro-algae with increasing organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 760-770.
    8. Montingelli, Maria E. & Benyounis, Khaled Y. & Quilty, Brid & Stokes, Joseph & Olabi, Abdul G., 2016. "Optimisation of biogas production from the macroalgae Laminaria sp. at different periods of harvesting in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 671-682.
    9. Yang, Min & Watson, Jamison & Wang, Zixin & Si, Buchun & Jiang, Weizhong & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2022. "Understanding and design of two-stage fermentation: A perspective of interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Lin, Richen & O'Shea, Richard & Deng, Chen & Wu, Benteng & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "A perspective on the efficacy of green gas production via integration of technologies in novel cascading circular bio-systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Xu, Xianzhen & Gu, Xiaoguang & Wang, Zhongyang & Shatner, William & Wang, Zhenjun, 2019. "Progress, challenges and solutions of research on photosynthetic carbon sequestration efficiency of microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 65-82.
    12. Vo, Truc T.Q. & Xia, Ao & Wall, David M. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2017. "Use of surplus wind electricity in Ireland to produce compressed renewable gaseous transport fuel through biological power to gas systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 495-504.
    13. Zuo, Wei & E, Jiaqiang & Hu, Wenyu & Jin, Yu & Han, Dandan, 2017. "Numerical investigations on combustion characteristics of H2/air premixed combustion in a micro elliptical tube combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Pankratz, Stan & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2017. "Algae production platforms for Canada's northern climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 109-120.
    15. Olesia Havryliuk & Vira Hovorukha & Oleksandr Savitsky & Volodymyr Trilis & Antonina Kalinichenko & Agnieszka Dołhańczuk-Śródka & Daniel Janecki & Oleksandr Tashyrev, 2021. "Anaerobic Degradation of Environmentally Hazardous Aquatic Plant Pistia stratiotes and Soluble Cu(II) Detoxification by Methanogenic Granular Microbial Preparation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Braud, L. & McDonnell, K. & Murphy, F., 2023. "Environmental life cycle assessment of algae systems: Critical review of modelling approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Zhu, L.-D. & Hiltunen, E., 2016. "Application of livestock waste compost to cultivate microalgae for bioproducts production: A feasible framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1285-1290.
    18. Win, Shwe S. & Ebner, Jacqueline H. & Brownell, Sarah A. & Pagano, Susan S. & Cruz-Diloné, Pedro & Trabold, Thomas A., 2018. "Anaerobic digestion of black solider fly larvae (BSFL) biomass as part of an integrated biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 705-712.
    19. Duarte Souza Alvarenga Santos, Nathália & Rückert Roso, Vinícius & Teixeira Malaquias, Augusto César & Coelho Baêta, José Guilherme, 2021. "Internal combustion engines and biofuels: Examining why this robust combination should not be ignored for future sustainable transportation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Mazzanti, Gaia & Demichelis, Francesca & Fino, Debora & Tommasi, Tonia, 2025. "A closed-loop valorization of the waste biomass through two-stage anaerobic digestion and digestate exploitation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:969-:d:1025808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.