IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5335-d869495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gas Concentration Prediction Method Driven by a Spark Streaming Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxin Huang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Jingdao Fan

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Zhenguo Yan

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shugang Li

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Yanping Wang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

In the traditional coal-mine gas-concentration prediction process, problems such as low timeliness of data and low efficiency of the prediction model in learning data features result in low accuracy of the final prediction. To solve these problems, a gas-concentration prediction method driven by the Spark Streaming framework is proposed. In this research study, the Spark Streaming framework, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and support vector machine (SVM) model are used to construct a new prediction model called the SPARS model. The Spark Streaming framework is used to process large batches of real-time streaming data in a short period of time, and the model can be used to intermittently update and optimize the prediction model so that the model can fully learn the characteristics of the data. At the same time, the advantages of the ARIMA model and SVM model for processing linear data and nonlinear data are combined to improve the model’s prediction efficiency and fully reflect the timeliness of gas prediction. Finally, the proposed prediction model is verified using gas data collected on site. The optimal learning time for the SPARS model in predicting this set of data is determined, and a comparative analysis of the prediction results obtained from the ARIMA, SVM and other models fully confirms that high-precision prediction results can be obtained using the SPARS model. The proposed model can be used to realize scientific and accurate real-time prediction and analyses of coal-mine gas concentrations and provides a new idea for realizing real-time and accurate gas prediction in coal mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2022. "A Gas Concentration Prediction Method Driven by a Spark Streaming Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5335-:d:869495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Svetunkov & John E. Boylan, 2020. "State-space ARIMA for supply-chain forecasting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 818-827, February.
    2. Xiangqian Wang & Ningke Xu & Xiangrui Meng & Haoqian Chang, 2022. "Prediction of Gas Concentration Based on LSTM-LightGBM Variable Weight Combination Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2021. "Research on Early Warning for Gas Risks at a Working Face Based on Association Rule Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2019. "Predicting Methane Concentration in Longwall Regions Using Artificial Neural Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Wang, Ke & Zhang, Jianjun & Cai, Bofeng & Yu, Shengmin, 2019. "Emission factors of fugitive methane from underground coal mines in China: Estimation and uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 273-282.
    6. Tianjun Zhang & Shuang Song & Shugang Li & Li Ma & Shaobo Pan & Liyun Han, 2019. "Research on Gas Concentration Prediction Models Based on LSTM Multidimensional Time Series," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Issam Dawoud & Selahattin Kaçiranlar, 2017. "An optimal k of kth MA-ARIMA models under a class of ARIMA model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 5754-5765, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Zhironkin & Elena Dotsenko, 2023. "Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-35, August.
    2. Olga Zhironkina & Sergey Zhironkin, 2023. "Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-37, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2021. "Research on Early Warning for Gas Risks at a Working Face Based on Association Rule Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Xiangrui Meng & Haoqian Chang & Xiangqian Wang, 2022. "Methane Concentration Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Classical Time Series Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Shafiqah Azman & Dharini Pathmanathan & Aerambamoorthy Thavaneswaran, 2022. "Forecasting the Volatility of Cryptocurrencies in the Presence of COVID-19 with the State Space Model and Kalman Filter," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Lluís Sanmiquel-Pera & Marc Bascompta & Hernán Francisco Anticoi, 2019. "Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Anyu Zhu & Qifei Wang & Dongqiao Liu & Yihan Zhao, 2022. "Analysis of the Characteristics of CH 4 Emissions in China’s Coal Mining Industry and Research on Emission Reduction Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Kai Yu & Lujie Zhou & Pingping Liu & Jing Chen & Dejun Miao & Jiansheng Wang, 2022. "Research on a Risk Early Warning Mathematical Model Based on Data Mining in China’s Coal Mine Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Yang, Ruiyue & Hong, Chunyang & Huang, Zhongwei & Song, Xianzhi & Zhang, Shikun & Wen, Haitao, 2019. "Coal breakage using abrasive liquid nitrogen jet and its implications for coalbed methane recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Future Cities Carbon Emission Models: Hybrid Vehicle Emission Modelling for Low-Emission Zones," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Souradeep Chakraborty, 2019. "Capturing Financial markets to apply Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1907.04373, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    11. Li, Junjie & Cheng, Wanjing, 2020. "Comparison of life-cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of coal to ethanol and bioethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Shuang Song & Shugang Li & Tianjun Zhang & Li Ma & Shaobo Pan & Lu Gao, 2021. "Research on a Multi-Parameter Fusion Prediction Model of Pressure Relief Gas Concentration Based on RNN," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Isabel Amez & David León & Alexander Ivannikov & Konstantin Kolikov & Blanca Castells, 2023. "Potential of CBM as an Energy Vector in Active Mines and Abandoned Mines in Russia and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Wen, Hu & Yan, Li & Jin, Yongfei & Wang, Zhipeng & Guo, Jun & Deng, Jun, 2023. "Coalbed methane concentration prediction and early-warning in fully mechanized mining face based on deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Islam, Samiul & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Wardley, Leslie J., 2021. "Machine learning and optimization models for supplier selection and order allocation planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Zian Lin & Yuanfa Ji & Xiyan Sun, 2023. "Advance Landslide Prediction and Warning Model Based on Stacking Fusion Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Aljuneidi, Tariq & Punia, Sushil & Jebali, Aida & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2024. "Forecasting and planning for a critical infrastructure sector during a pandemic: Empirical evidence from a food supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 936-952.
    18. Fei Qian & Li Chen & Jun Li & Chao Ding & Xianfu Chen & Jian Wang, 2019. "Direct Prediction of the Toxic Gas Diffusion Rule in a Real Environment Based on LSTM," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Zhang, Yueling & Li, Junjie & Yang, Xiaoxiao, 2021. "Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Andre S. Barcelos & Antonio J. Marques Cardoso, 2021. "Current-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5335-:d:869495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.