IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2321-d539611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Validation of the Thermal Processes Modeling in a Solar Still

Author

Listed:
  • Ewelina Radomska

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 St., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Lukasz Mika

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 St., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Karol Sztekler

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 St., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Wojciech Kalawa

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 St., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Passive solar distillation is cheap and energy-efficient technology but its main disadvantage is low productivity. Thus, there are many attempts to improve solar stills’ productivity, and one of them is changing the mass of the water. This paper presents the results of validation of the thermal processes modeling in a solar still (SS). In order to validate the model, the experimental studies were conducted in a laboratory to ensure uniform climatic conditions. The studies were carried out for 10 kg, 15 kg, and 20 kg of water under three different solar irradiance conditions. The results show that 10 kg and 20 kg of water ensure the highest and the lowest daily productivity, respectively, independently of solar irradiance. When the water mass is 10 kg, the solar still’s productivity is 800 mL/m 2 /day, 3732 mL/m 2 /day, and 9392 mL/m 2 /day for low, medium, and high solar irradiance, respectively. Additionally, it is found that reducing the water mass from 20 kg to 10 kg can improve solar still’s productivity by a maximum value of 21.6%, which is obtained for low solar irradiance. The proposed mathematical model allows predicting the performance of the SS. The results of the theoretical calculations are in good agreement with the results of the experiments. The minimum and maximum deviation between the actual and theoretical productivity of the SS is 1.1% and 8.3%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewelina Radomska & Lukasz Mika & Karol Sztekler & Wojciech Kalawa, 2021. "Experimental Validation of the Thermal Processes Modeling in a Solar Still," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2321-:d:539611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalidasa Murugavel, K. & Srithar, K., 2011. "Performance study on basin type double slope solar still with different wick materials and minimum mass of water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 612-620.
    2. Macmanus Chinenye Ndukwu & Lyes Bennamoun & Merlin Simo-Tagne, 2021. "Reviewing the Exergy Analysis of Solar Thermal Systems Integrated with Phase Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Mahmoud S. El-Sebaey & Asko Ellman & Ahmed Hegazy & Tarek Ghonim, 2020. "Experimental Analysis and CFD Modeling for Conventional Basin-Type Solar Still," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. M. Mohamed Thalib & Athikesavan Muthu Manokar & Fadl A. Essa & N. Vasimalai & Ravishankar Sathyamurthy & Fausto Pedro Garcia Marquez, 2020. "Comparative Study of Tubular Solar Stills with Phase Change Material and Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Sampathkumar, K. & Arjunan, T.V. & Pitchandi, P. & Senthilkumar, P., 2010. "Active solar distillation--A detailed review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1503-1526, August.
    6. Tsilingiris, P.T., 2018. "Review and critical comparative evaluation of moist air thermophysical properties at the temperature range between 0 and 100°C for Engineering Calculations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 50-63.
    7. Muftah, Ali. F. & Alghoul, M.A. & Fudholi, Ahmad & Abdul-Majeed, M.M. & Sopian, K., 2014. "Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: A detailed review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 430-447.
    8. Arunkumar, T. & Raj, Kaiwalya & Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D. & Denkenberger, David & Tingting, Guo & Xuan, Li & Velraj, R., 2019. "A review of efficient high productivity solar stills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 197-220.
    9. Mohammad Reza Safaei & Hamid Reza Goshayeshi & Issa Chaer, 2019. "Solar Still Efficiency Enhancement by Using Graphene Oxide/Paraffin Nano-PCM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewelina Radomska & Łukasz Mika & Karol Sztekler & Wojciech Kalawa & Łukasz Lis & Kinga Pielichowska & Magdalena Szumera & Paweł Rutkowski, 2023. "Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Single-Slope Passive Solar Still with Phase-Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Mohamed Benghanem & Adel Mellit & Mohammed Emad & Abdulaziz Aljohani, 2021. "Monitoring of Solar Still Desalination System Using the Internet of Things Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossein Yousefi & Mohamad Aramesh & Bahman Shabani, 2021. "Design Parameters of a Double-Slope Solar Still: Modelling, Sensitivity Analysis, and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Ali O. Al-Sulttani & Amimul Ahsan & Basim A. R. Al-Bakri & Mahir Mahmod Hason & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud & S. Idrus & Omer A. Alawi & Elżbieta Macioszek & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2022. "Double-Slope Solar Still Productivity Based on the Number of Rubber Scraper Motions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat & Hassan, Hamdy, 2020. "An experimental work on the performance of new integration of photovoltaic panel with solar still in semi-arid climate conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1429-1443.
    4. Muftah, Ali. F. & Alghoul, M.A. & Fudholi, Ahmad & Abdul-Majeed, M.M. & Sopian, K., 2014. "Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: A detailed review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 430-447.
    5. Kaviti, Ajay Kumar & Yadav, Akhilesh & Shukla, Amit, 2016. "Inclined solar still designs: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 429-451.
    6. Arunkumar, T. & Wang, Jiaqiang & Denkenberger, D., 2021. "Capillary flow-driven efficient nanomaterials for seawater desalination: Review of classifications, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Jesus Fernando Hinojosa & Saul Fernando Moreno & Victor Manuel Maytorena, 2023. "Low-Temperature Applications of Phase Change Materials for Energy Storage: A Descriptive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-39, March.
    8. El-Sebaii, A.A., 2011. "On effect of wind speed on passive solar still performance based on inner/outer surface temperatures of the glass cover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4943-4949.
    9. Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D. & Iniyan, S. & Suganthi, L. & Davies, P.A., 2016. "Solar stills: A comprehensive review of designs, performance and material advances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 464-496.
    10. Sharshir, S.W. & Elsheikh, A.H. & Peng, Guilong & Yang, Nuo & El-Samadony, M.O.A. & Kabeel, A.E., 2017. "Thermal performance and exergy analysis of solar stills – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 521-544.
    11. Hassan, Hamdy & Ahmed, M. Salem & Fathy, Mohamed, 2019. "Experimental work on the effect of saline water medium on the performance of solar still with tracked parabolic trough collector (TPTC)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 136-147.
    12. Elango, C. & Gunasekaran, N. & Sampathkumar, K., 2015. "Thermal models of solar still—A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 856-911.
    13. Mousa, Hasan & Gujarathi, Ashish M., 2016. "Modeling and analysis the productivity of solar desalination units with phase change materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 225-232.
    14. Muthu Manokar, A. & Kalidasa Murugavel, K. & Esakkimuthu, G., 2014. "Different parameters affecting the rate of evaporation and condensation on passive solar still – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 309-322.
    15. Al-Nimr, Moh’d A. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2020. "A novel hybrid and interactive solar system consists of Stirling engine ̸vacuum evaporator ̸thermoelectric cooler for electricity generation and water distillation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1053-1066.
    16. Al-Nimr, Moh'd.A. & Dawahdeh, Ahmad I., 2023. "A novel hybrid reverse osmosis and flash desalination system powered by solar photovoltaic/thermal collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Jani, Hardik K. & Modi, Kalpesh V., 2018. "A review on numerous means of enhancing heat transfer rate in solar-thermal based desalination devices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 302-317.
    18. Kalidasa Murugavel, K. & Anburaj, P. & Samuel Hanson, R. & Elango, T., 2013. "Progresses in inclined type solar stills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 364-377.
    19. Prakash, P. & Velmurugan, V., 2015. "Parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 585-609.
    20. Durkaieswaran, P. & Murugavel, K. Kalidasa, 2015. "Various special designs of single basin passive solar still – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1048-1060.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2321-:d:539611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.