IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v83y2018icp50-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and critical comparative evaluation of moist air thermophysical properties at the temperature range between 0 and 100°C for Engineering Calculations

Author

Listed:
  • Tsilingiris, P.T.

Abstract

Although a broad range of heat transfer and engineering calculations require the use of thermophysical and transport properties of humid atmospheric air at the temperature range between 0 and 100°C, there is a relatively considerable gap in the scientific literature concerning their precise evaluation. Even though numerous theoretical procedures and formulas have been developed for the mixture property evaluation, relatively very few devoted to the dry air/water vapor binary mixture can be found in the literature. In an earlier publication, simple procedures were employed to evaluate and investigate their influence on the heat and mass transfer calculations, while a decade ago alternative, more refined kinetic theory procedures were presented for the calculation of moist air properties. These which were found in a fairly good agreement with the very few and incomplete earlier published measurements, were algebraically fitted to allow the evaluation of saturated mixture properties of moist air. The present investigation aims at the validation of the proposed moist air properties based on comparisons with results from numerous theoretical procedures or data derived by employing commercial computer software and more recent experimental measurements. However, since no recent experimental results have appeared in the literature in the meantime, the validation was based on extensive comparisons and critical consistency evaluation of calculated results from various developed models. It was found that the proposed moist air properties are in a fairly good agreement with data from most of the numerous calculation processes reported in the literature, while certain methods and models appear to be physically invalid. The so derived results were fitted by algebraic correlations, allowing the accurate evaluation of moist air thermophysical properties at any relative humidity ranging from dry conditions up to saturation level in 10% steps. These are recommended until new precise validating measurements appear in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsilingiris, P.T., 2018. "Review and critical comparative evaluation of moist air thermophysical properties at the temperature range between 0 and 100°C for Engineering Calculations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 50-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:83:y:2018:i:c:p:50-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211731448X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewelina Radomska & Łukasz Mika & Karol Sztekler & Wojciech Kalawa & Łukasz Lis & Kinga Pielichowska & Magdalena Szumera & Paweł Rutkowski, 2023. "Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Single-Slope Passive Solar Still with Phase-Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Ewelina Radomska & Lukasz Mika & Karol Sztekler & Wojciech Kalawa, 2021. "Experimental Validation of the Thermal Processes Modeling in a Solar Still," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:83:y:2018:i:c:p:50-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.