IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8224-d696864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of the Gamma Re-Theta Transition Model for Simulating the DU-91-W2-250 Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Michna

    (Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Rogowski

    (Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Galih Bangga

    (Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Martin O. L. Hansen

    (Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, DK2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Accurate computation of the performance of a horizontal-axis wind turbine (HAWT) using Blade Element Momentum (BEM) based codes requires good quality aerodynamic characteristics of airfoils. This paper shows a numerical investigation of transitional flow over the DU 91-W2-250 airfoil with chord-based Reynolds number ranging from 3 × 10 6 to 6 × 10 6 . The primary goal of the present paper is to validate the unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) approach together with the four-equation transition SST turbulence model with experimental data from a wind tunnel. The main computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code used in this work was ANSYS Fluent. For comparison, two more CFD codes with the Transition SST model were used: FLOWer and STAR-CCM +. The obtained airfoil characteristics were also compared with the results of fully turbulent models published in other works. The XFOIL approach was also used in this work for comparison. The aerodynamic force coefficients obtained with the Transition SST model implemented in different CFD codes do not differ significantly from each other despite the different mesh distributions used. The drag coefficients obtained with fully turbulent models are too high. With the lowest Reynolds numbers analyzed in this work, the error in estimating the location of the transition was significant. This error decreases as the Reynolds number increases. The applicability of the uncalibrated transition SST approach for a two-dimensional thick airfoil is up to the critical angle of attack.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Michna & Krzysztof Rogowski & Galih Bangga & Martin O. L. Hansen, 2021. "Accuracy of the Gamma Re-Theta Transition Model for Simulating the DU-91-W2-250 Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8224-:d:696864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Carlos Álvarez-Feal & Luis Carral, 2018. "Influence of Size on the Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Bai, Chi-Jeng & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 506-519.
    3. Yu Hu & Jian Yang & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2020. "Study of the Bearing Capacity of Stiffened Tall Offshore Wind Turbine Towers during the Erection Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Margarita Vasileiou, 2018. "Site Selection of Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Systems in Greece Incorporating Environmental Impact Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    6. Tescione, G. & Simão Ferreira, C.J. & van Bussel, G.J.W., 2016. "Analysis of a free vortex wake model for the study of the rotor and near wake flow of a vertical axis wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 552-563.
    7. Yang, Hua & Shen, Wenzhong & Xu, Haoran & Hong, Zedong & Liu, Chao, 2014. "Prediction of the wind turbine performance by using BEM with airfoil data extracted from CFD," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 107-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galih Bangga, 2022. "Progress and Outlook in Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-5, September.
    2. Yu Chen & Nick Gibbons, 2022. "Simulations of Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition over a Flat Plate with the Spalart-Allmaras One-Equation BCM Transitional Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Kiran Siddappaji & Mark Turner, 2022. "Improved Prediction of Aerodynamic Loss Propagation as Entropy Rise in Wind Turbines Using Multifidelity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-44, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Mazzeo & Derek Micheletto & Alessandro Talamelli & Antonio Segalini, 2022. "An Experimental Study on a Wind Turbine Rotor Affected by Pitch Imbalance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Srikanth Bashetty & Selahattin Ozcelik, 2021. "Review on Dynamics of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Wei Li & Shinai Xu & Baiyun Qian & Xiaoxia Gao & Xiaoxun Zhu & Zeqi Shi & Wei Liu & Qiaoliang Hu, 2022. "Large-Scale Wind Turbine’s Load Characteristics Excited by the Wind and Grid in Complex Terrain: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Hércules Araújo Oliveira & José Gomes de Matos & Luiz Antonio de Souza Ribeiro & Osvaldo Ronald Saavedra & Jerson Rogério Pinheiro Vaz, 2023. "Assessment of Correction Methods Applied to BEMT for Predicting Performance of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Shabnam Hosseinzadeh & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodney A. Stewart, 2023. "Site Selection of Combined Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Farms: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    6. Siddiqui, M. Salman & Rasheed, Adil & Tabib, Mandar & Kvamsdal, Trond, 2019. "Numerical investigation of modeling frameworks and geometric approximations on NREL 5 MW wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1058-1075.
    7. Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Pathways to low carbon energy transition through multi criteria assessment of offshore wind energy barriers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Ali, Qazi Shahzad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "Power conversion performance of airborne wind turbine under unsteady loads," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Mauro, S. & Lanzafame, R. & Messina, M. & Brusca, S., 2023. "On the importance of the root-to-hub adapter effects on HAWT performance: A CFD-BEM numerical investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    11. Li, Qing'an & Maeda, Takao & Kamada, Yasunari & Shimizu, Kento & Ogasawara, Tatsuhiko & Nakai, Alisa & Kasuya, Takuji, 2017. "Effect of rotor aspect ratio and solidity on a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine in three-dimensional analysis by the panel method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Ho, Lip-Wah & Lie, Tek-Tjing & Leong, Paul TM & Clear, Tony, 2018. "Developing offshore wind farm siting criteria by using an international Delphi method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 53-67.
    13. Wang, Peilin & Liu, Qingsong & Li, Chun & Miao, Weipao & Yue, Minnan & Xu, Zifei, 2022. "Investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of horizontal axis wind turbine using an active flow control method via boundary layer suction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1032-1048.
    14. Chen, Bei & Hua, Xugang & Zhang, Zili & Nielsen, Søren R.K. & Chen, Zhengqing, 2021. "Active flutter control of the wind turbines using double-pitched blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2081-2097.
    15. Lingqian Meng & Hongyan Ding, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Contact Force between the Vessel and CBF in the Integrated Floating Transportation Process of Offshore Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Erkan, Onur & Özkan, Musa & Karakoç, T. Hikmet & Garrett, Stephen J. & Thomas, Peter J., 2020. "Investigation of aerodynamic performance characteristics of a wind-turbine-blade profile using the finite-volume method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1359-1367.
    17. Albara M. Mustafa & Abbas Barabadi, 2022. "Criteria-Based Fuzzy Logic Risk Analysis of Wind Farms Operation in Cold Climate Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Lapa, Gabriel Vicentin Pereira & Gay Neto, Alfredo & Franzini, Guilherme Rosa, 2023. "Effects of blade torsion on IEA 15MW turbine rotor operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    19. Cai, Chang & Yang, Yingjian & Jia, Yan & Wu, Guangxing & Zhang, Hairui & Yuan, Feiqi & Qian, Quan & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "Aerodynamic load evaluation of leading edge and trailing edge windward states of large-scale wind turbine blade under parked condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    20. John Dorrell & Keunjae Lee, 2020. "The Cost of Wind: Negative Economic Effects of Global Wind Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8224-:d:696864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.