IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i1p224-d304627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO 2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunyong Lee

    (R&D Division, Korean Register, 36, Myeongji Ocean City 9-ro, Gangseo-gu, Busan 46762, Korea
    Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea)

  • Inchul Jung

    (R&D Division, Korean Register, 36, Myeongji Ocean City 9-ro, Gangseo-gu, Busan 46762, Korea)

  • Gilltae Roh

    (R&D Division, Korean Register, 36, Myeongji Ocean City 9-ro, Gangseo-gu, Busan 46762, Korea)

  • Youngseung Na

    (Department of Mechanical and Information Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoulsiripdaero 163, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Hokeun Kang

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea)

Abstract

This study performs energetic and exergetic comparisons between the steam methane reforming and steam methanol reforming technologies combined with HT-PEMFC and a carbon capture/liquefaction system for use in hydrogen-fueled ships. The required space for the primary fuel and captured/liquefied CO 2 and the fuel cost have also been investigated to find the more advantageous system for ship application. For the comparison, the steam methane reforming-based system fed by LNG and the steam methanol reforming-based system fed by methanol have been modeled in an Aspen HYSYS environment. All the simulations have been conducted at a fixed W net , electrical (475 kW) to meet the average shaft power of the reference ship. Results show that at the base condition, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the methanol-based system are 7.99% and 1.89% higher than those of the methane-based system, respectively. The cogeneration efficiency of the methane-based system is 7.13% higher than that of the methanol-based system. The comparison of space for fuel and CO 2 storage reveals that the methanol-based system requires a space 1.1 times larger than that of the methane-based system for the total voyage time, although the methanol-based system has higher electrical efficiency. In addition, the methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than that of the methane-based system to generate 475 kW net of electricity for the total voyage time.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunyong Lee & Inchul Jung & Gilltae Roh & Youngseung Na & Hokeun Kang, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO 2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:224-:d:304627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leo, T.J. & Durango, J.A. & Navarro, E., 2010. "Exergy analysis of PEM fuel cells for marine applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1164-1171.
    2. Jaggi, Vikas & Jayanti, S., 2013. "A conceptual model of a high-efficiency, stand-alone power unit based on a fuel cell stack with an integrated auto-thermal ethanol reformer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 295-303.
    3. Iulianelli, A. & Ribeirinha, P. & Mendes, A. & Basile, A., 2014. "Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 355-368.
    4. Ersoz, Atilla & Olgun, Hayati & Ozdogan, Sibel, 2006. "Simulation study of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell system with autothermal reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1490-1500.
    5. Authayanun, Suthida & Saebea, Dang & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2014. "Effect of different fuel options on performance of high-temperature PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 989-997.
    6. Hajjaji, Noureddine & Pons, Marie-Noëlle & Houas, Ammar & Renaudin, Viviane, 2012. "Exergy analysis: An efficient tool for understanding and improving hydrogen production via the steam methane reforming process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 392-399.
    7. Ribeirinha, P. & Abdollahzadeh, M. & Sousa, J.M. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2017. "Modelling of a high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell integrated with a methanol steam reformer cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 6-19.
    8. Ferrara, G. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Ho, M.T. & Wiley, D.E., 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of post-combustion CO2 capture using MEA-solvent chemical absorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 113-128.
    9. Oh, Se-Young & Binns, Michael & Cho, Habin & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2016. "Energy minimization of MEA-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 353-362.
    10. Tsatsaronis, George, 2007. "Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 249-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossein Asgharian & Florin Iov & Samuel Simon Araya & Thomas Helmer Pedersen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Ehsan Baniasadi & Vincenzo Liso, 2023. "A Review on Process Modeling and Simulation of Cryogenic Carbon Capture for Post-Combustion Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    2. Inal, Omer Berkehan & Charpentier, Jean-Frédéric & Deniz, Cengiz, 2022. "Hybrid power and propulsion systems for ships: Current status and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Marcin Pajak & Grzegorz Brus & Janusz S. Szmyd, 2021. "Catalyst Distribution Optimization Scheme for Effective Green Hydrogen Production from Biogas Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Phan Anh Duong & Borim Ryu & Chongmin Kim & Jinuk Lee & Hokeun Kang, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of an Ammonia Fuel Cell Integrated System for Marine Vessels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ribeirinha, P. & Abdollahzadeh, M. & Pereira, A. & Relvas, F. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2018. "High temperature PEM fuel cell integrated with a cellular membrane methanol steam reformer: Experimental and modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 659-669.
    2. Salemme, Lucia & Menna, Laura & Simeone, Marino, 2013. "Calculation of the energy efficiency of fuel processor – PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell systems from fuel elementar composition and heating value," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 368-374.
    3. Ribeirinha, P. & Abdollahzadeh, M. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2017. "H2 production with low carbon content via MSR in packed bed membrane reactors for high-temperature polymeric electrolyte membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 409-419.
    4. Lee, Woo-Sung & Kang, Jun-Ho & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2020. "Enhancement of energy efficiency by exhaust gas recirculation with oxygen-rich combustion in a natural gas combined cycle with a carbon capture process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Lee, Chi-Hung & Chen, Szu-Hsien & Wang, Yen-Zen & Lin, Chao-Chien & Huang, Chih-Kai & Chuang, Ching-Nan & Wang, Chih-Kuang & Hsieh, Kuo-Huang, 2013. "Preparation and characterization of proton exchange membranes based on semi-interpenetrating sulfonated poly(imide-siloxane)/epoxy polymer networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 905-915.
    6. Ipsakis, Dimitris & Ouzounidou, Martha & Papadopoulou, Simira & Seferlis, Panos & Voutetakis, Spyros, 2017. "Dynamic modeling and control analysis of a methanol autothermal reforming and PEM fuel cell power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 703-718.
    7. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    8. Zeng, Xingyan & Zhu, Lin & Huang, Yue & Lv, Liping & Zhang, Chaoli & Hao, Qiang & Fan, Junming, 2024. "Combined pinch and exergy analysis for post-combustion carbon capture NGCC integrated with absorption heat transformer and flash evaporator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Ribeirinha, P. & Alves, I. & Vázquez, F. Vidal & Schuller, G. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2017. "Heat integration of methanol steam reformer with a high-temperature polymeric electrolyte membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 468-477.
    10. Lei, Gang & Zheng, Hualin & Zhang, Jun & Siong Chin, Cheng & Xu, Xinhai & Zhou, Weijiang & Zhang, Caizhi, 2023. "Analyzing characteristic and modeling of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with CO poisoning effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Chuenphan, Thapanat & Yurata, Tarabordin & Sema, Teerawat & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon, 2022. "Techno-economic sensitivity analysis for optimization of carbon dioxide capture process by potassium carbonate solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    12. Shamsi, Mohammad & Naeiji, Esfandiyar & Rooeentan, Saeed & Shahandashty, Behnam Fayyaz & Namegoshayfard, Parham & Bonyadi, Mohammad, 2023. "Proposal and investigation of CO2 capture from fired heater flue gases to increase methanol production: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Zhang, Xiaowen & Zhang, Rui & Liu, Helei & Gao, Hongxia & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Evaluating CO2 desorption performance in CO2-loaded aqueous tri-solvent blend amines with and without solid acid catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 417-429.
    14. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    15. Tang, Yuanyou & Wang, Yang & Long, Wuqiang & Xiao, Ge & Wang, Yongjian & Li, Weixing, 2023. "Analysis and enhancement of methanol reformer performance for online reforming based on waste heat recovery of methanol-diesel dual direct injection engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    17. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Suleman & Ihtishamul Haq & Syed Asad Jamal, 2018. "Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 998-1031, December.
    18. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    19. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    20. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:224-:d:304627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.