IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5001-d417974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed A. Hassaan

    (Marine Pollution Lab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria 21556, Egypt
    Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bari University, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Antonio Pantaleo

    (Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bari University, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesco Santoro

    (Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bari University, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Marwa R. Elkatory

    (City for Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Advanced Technology and New Materials Research Institute, Alexandria 21934, Egypt)

  • Giuseppe De Mastro

    (Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bari University, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Amany El Sikaily

    (Marine Pollution Lab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria 21556, Egypt)

  • Safaa Ragab

    (Marine Pollution Lab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria 21556, Egypt)

  • Ahmed El Nemr

    (Marine Pollution Lab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria 21556, Egypt)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) on the biogas production from mechanically treated barley straw and to perform a techno-economic analysis based on the costs assessment and on the results of biogas production. The structural changes of mechanically pretreated barley straw were observed using FTIR, XRD, TGA, and SEM. Additionally, both green ZnO NPs prepared from red alga ( Antithamnion plumula ) extract and chemically prepared ZnO NPs were characterized by FTIR, XRD, SEM, and TEM, surface area, and EDX. The results revealed that the biogas production was slightly improved by 14.9 and 13.2% when the barley straw of 0.4 mm was mechanically pretreated with 10 mg/L of both green and chemical ZnO NPs and produced 390.5 mL biogas/g VS and 385 mL biogas/g VS, respectively. On the other hand, the higher concentrations of ZnO NPs equal to 20 mg/L had an inhibitory effect on biogas production and decreased the biogas yield to 173 mL biogas/g VS, which was less than the half of previous values. It was also clear that the mechanically treated barley straw of 0.4 mm size presented a higher biogas yield of about 340 mL/g VS, in comparison to 279 mL biogas/g VS of untreated biomass. The kinetic study showed that the first order, modified Gompertz and logistic function models had the best fit with the experimental data. The results showed that the nanoparticles (NPs) of the mechanically treated barely straw are a suitable source of biomass for biogas production, and its yields are higher than the untreated barley straw. The results of the cost-benefit analysis showed that the average levelized cost of energy (LCOE), adopting the best treatments (0.4 mm + 10 mg/L ZnO), is 0.21 €/kWh, which is not competitive with the other renewable energy systems in the Egyptian energy market.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5001-:d:417974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Xiaojiao & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin, 2017. "Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 352-360.
    2. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Egelund, H. & Larsen, U. & Pedersen, J. & Trénel, P. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Mechanical pretreatment at harvesting increases the bioenergy output from marginal land grasses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 914-921.
    3. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Mohammed, M. & Egyir, I. S. & Donkor, A. K. & Amoah, Philip & Nyarko, S. & Boateng, K. K. & Ziwu, C., "undated". "Feasibility study for biogas integration into waste treatment plants in Ghana," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H047916, International Water Management Institute.
    6. Appels, Lise & Lauwers, Joost & Degrève, Jan & Helsen, Lieve & Lievens, Bart & Willems, Kris & Van Impe, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2011. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4295-4301.
    7. Maurizio Carlini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Sonia Castellucci & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni, 2017. "An Economical Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Fed with Organic Agro-Industrial Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Mavris, Vassilis, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2147-2160.
    9. Arrigo Salvatore Guerrieri & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro & Simone Pascuzzi, 2019. "Study of a Large Square Baler with Innovative Technological Systems that Optimize the Baling Effectiveness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, April.
    10. Feng, Lu & Perschke, Yolanda Maria Lemes & Fontaine, Doline & Ward, Alastair James & Eriksen, Jørgen & Sørensen, Peter & Møller, Henrik Bjarne, 2019. "Co-ensiling of cover crops and barley straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 677-683.
    11. Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Abdel-Hadi, M.A. & Hassan, H.E. & Badr, Y., 2017. "Influence of zero valent iron nanoparticles and magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 842-853.
    12. Ganzoury, Mohamed A. & Allam, Nageh K., 2015. "Impact of nanotechnology on biogas production: A mini-review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1392-1404.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel Barrena & Javier Moral-Vico & Xavier Font & Antoni Sánchez, 2022. "Enhancement of Anaerobic Digestion with Nanomaterials: A Mini Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Hassaan, Mohamed A. & Elkatory, Marwa R. & El-Nemr, Mohamed A. & Ragab, Safaa & Yi, Xiaohui & Huang, Mingzhi & El Nemr, Ahmed, 2024. "Synthesis, characterization, optimization and application of Pisum sativum peels S and N-doping biochars in the production of biogas from Ulva lactuca," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Ahmed El Nemr & Marwa R. Elkatory & Safaa Ragab & Mohamed A. El-Nemr & Antonio Pantaleo, 2021. "Synthesis, Characterization, and Synergistic Effects of Modified Biochar in Combination with α-Fe 2 O 3 NPs on Biogas Production from Red Algae Pterocladia capillacea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Ahmed El Nemr & Marwa R. Elkatory & Ahmed Eleryan & Safaa Ragab & Amany El Sikaily & Antonio Pantaleo, 2021. "Enhancement of Biogas Production from Macroalgae Ulva latuca via Ozonation Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Ahmed El Nemr & Marwa R. Elkatory & Ahmed Eleryan & Safaa Ragab & Amany El Sikaily & Antonio Pantaleo, 2021. "Enhancement of Biogas Production from Macroalgae Ulva latuca via Ozonation Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Artur Przywara & Francesco Santoro & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Anna Pecyna & Simone Pascuzzi, 2020. "Experimental Study of Disc Fertilizer Spreader Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Ievhen Ihnatiev, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Front-Mounted Beet Topper Machine for Biomass Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Aguilar-Moreno, Guadalupe Stefanny & Navarro-Cerón, Elizabeth & Velázquez-Hernández, Azucena & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Aguilar-Méndez, Miguel Ángel & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2020. "Enhancing methane yield of chicken litter in anaerobic digestion using magnetite nanoparticles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 204-213.
    6. Kougias, P.G. & Kotsopoulos, T.A. & Martzopoulos, G.G., 2014. "Effect of feedstock composition and organic loading rate during the mesophilic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater and swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 202-207.
    7. Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Alvaro Marucci & Elena Di Mattia & Valerio Cristofori & Fabio Recanatesi & Mauro Villarini & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini, 2020. "WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-7, November.
    8. Alessandro Chiumenti & Andrea Pezzuolo & Davide Boscaro & Francesco da Borso, 2019. "Exploitation of Mowed Grass from Green Areas by Means of Anaerobic Digestion: Effects of Grass Conservation Methods (Drying and Ensiling) on Biogas and Biomethane Yield," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-11, August.
    9. Alessandro Chiumenti & Davide Boscaro & Francesco Da Borso & Luigi Sartori & Andrea Pezzuolo, 2018. "Biogas from Fresh Spring and Summer Grass: Effect of the Harvesting Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Noonari, A.A. & Mahar, R.B. & Sahito, A.R. & Brohi, K.M., 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of canola straw and banana plant wastes with buffalo dung: Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on methane yield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1046-1054.
    11. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Ahmed El Nemr & Marwa R. Elkatory & Safaa Ragab & Mohamed A. El-Nemr & Antonio Pantaleo, 2021. "Synthesis, Characterization, and Synergistic Effects of Modified Biochar in Combination with α-Fe 2 O 3 NPs on Biogas Production from Red Algae Pterocladia capillacea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Zhang, Zengshuai & Guo, Liang & Wang, Yi & Zhao, Yangguo & She, Zonglian & Gao, Mengchun & Guo, Yiding, 2020. "Application of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles during the two-stage anaerobic digestion with waste sludge: Impact on the biogas production and the substrate metabolism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2724-2735.
    14. Yazdani, Mohammad & Ebrahimi-Nik, Mohammadali & Heidari, Ava & Abbaspour-Fard, Mohammad Hossein, 2019. "Improvement of biogas production from slaughterhouse wastewater using biosynthesized iron nanoparticles from water treatment sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 496-501.
    15. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Theofanous, Elisavet & Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Florides, Georgios & Vyrides, Ioannis, 2014. "Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-270.
    17. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    18. Alejandro Moure Abelenda & Kirk T. Semple & George Aggidis & Farid Aiouache, 2022. "Circularity of Bioenergy Residues: Acidification of Anaerobic Digestate Prior to Addition of Wood Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Periyasamy Elaiyaraju & Nagarajan Partha, 2012. "Biogas Production from Sago (Tapioca) Wastewater Using Anaerobic Batch Reactor," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(4), pages 631-645, June.
    20. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5001-:d:417974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.