IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i11p2724-d364326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Rajabi Hamedani

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University of Viterbo, Via San Camillo de Lellis, snc-01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Mauro Villarini

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University of Viterbo, Via San Camillo de Lellis, snc-01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Andrea Colantoni

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University of Viterbo, Via San Camillo de Lellis, snc-01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Maurizio Carlini

    (Department of Economy, Engineering, Society And Business (DEIM), Tuscia University of Viterbo, Via Del Paradiso, 47-01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Massimo Cecchini

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University of Viterbo, Via San Camillo de Lellis, snc-01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Francesco Santoro

    (Department DISAAT, University of Bari, Via Amendola, 165 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Antonio Pantaleo

    (Department DISAAT, University of Bari, Via Amendola, 165 70125 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Italian power generation through anaerobic digestion (AD) has grown significantly between 2009 and 2016, becoming an important renewable energy resource for the country, also thanks to the generous incentives for produced electricity available in the last years. This work focuses on the economic and environmental issues of AD technology and proposes a techno-economic analysis of investment profitability without government support. In particular, the analysis focuses on an AD power plant fed by zootechnical wastewater and agro-industrial residues coupled to a cogeneration (CHP) system and a digestate-composting plant that produces soil fertilizers. We aim to determine the economic profitability of such AD power plants fed by inner-farm biomass wastes, exploiting digestate as fertilizer, using the cogenerated heat and taking into account the externalities (environmental benefits). Environmental analysis was carried out via a life cycle analysis (LCA), and encompassing the production of biogas, heat/electricity and compost in the downstream process. The un-released environmental emissions were converted into economic benefits by means of a stepwise approach. The results indicate that integrating a compost plant with a biogas plant can significantly increase the carbon credits of the process. The results were evaluated by means of a sensitivity analysis, and they report an IRR in the range of 6%–9% according to the Italian legislative support mechanisms, and possibilities to increase revenues with the use of digestate as fertilizer. The results significantly improve when externalities are included.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2724-:d:364326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Browne, James D. & Allen, Eoin & Murphy, Jerry D., 2014. "Assessing the variability in biomethane production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 307-314.
    2. Pantaleo, Antonio & Gennaro, Bernardo De & Shah, Nilay, 2013. "Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: An application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 57-70.
    3. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Mintz, Marianne M. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: Challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 346-362.
    4. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Maurizio Carlini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Sonia Castellucci & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni, 2017. "An Economical Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Fed with Organic Agro-Industrial Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Hijazi, O. & Munro, S. & Zerhusen, B. & Effenberger, M., 2016. "Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1291-1300.
    7. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro, 2019. "Oscillations Analysis of Front-Mounted Beet Topper Machine for Biomass Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Tom Kuppens & Robert Malina & Enrico Bocci & Andrea Colantoni & Mauro Villarini, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Valuation of Biochar Production: Two Case Studies in Belgium," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Yong, Zihan & Dong, Yulin & Zhang, Xu & Tan, Tianwei, 2015. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 527-530.
    10. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H., 2019. "The trilemma of waste-to-energy: A multi-purpose solution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 636-645.
    11. Teymoori Hamzehkolaei, Fatemeh & Amjady, Nima, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 602-614.
    12. Fabio De Menna & Remo Alessio Malagnino & Matteo Vittuari & Giovanni Molari & Giovanna Seddaiu & Paola A. Deligios & Stefania Solinas & Luigi Ledda, 2016. "Potential Biogas Production from Artichoke Byproducts in Sardinia, Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Giuseppe Ruggiero & Vladislav Zavadskiy & Simone Pascuzzi, 2019. "Lightning Protection Systems Suitable for Stables: A Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    14. Martínez-Ruano, Jimmy Anderson & Restrepo-Serna, Daissy Lorena & Carmona-Garcia, Estefanny & Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Poveda & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Effect of co-digestion of milk-whey and potato stem on heat and power generation using biogas as an energy vector: Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 504-518.
    15. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Sorrentino, Arianna & Miliozzi, Adio & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "Hybrid solar-biomass combined Brayton/organic Rankine-cycle plants integrated with thermal storage: Techno-economic feasibility in selected Mediterranean areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2913-2931.
    16. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Fiala, Marco & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Lema, Juan M. & Moreira, María Teresa, 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 625-635.
    17. Gabriel D. Oreggioni & Baboo Lesh Gowreesunker & Savvas A. Tassou & Giuseppe Bianchi & Matthew Reilly & Marie E. Kirby & Trisha A. Toop & Mike K. Theodorou, 2017. "Potential for Energy Production from Farm Wastes Using Anaerobic Digestion in the UK: An Economic Comparison of Different Size Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Arrigo Salvatore Guerrieri & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro & Simone Pascuzzi, 2019. "Study of a Large Square Baler with Innovative Technological Systems that Optimize the Baling Effectiveness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, April.
    19. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    20. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Michele Moretti & Enrico Bocci, 2018. "Life Cycle Performance of Hydrogen Production via Agro-Industrial Residue Gasification—A Small Scale Power Plant Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    21. Weidema, Bo Pedersen, 2009. "Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1591-1598, April.
    22. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    23. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis, 2018. "Mathematical Model of the Plane-Parallel Movement of the Self-Propelled Root-Harvesting Machine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    24. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Miliozzi, Adio & Russo, Valeria & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Novel hybrid CSP-biomass CHP for flexible generation: Thermo-economic analysis and profitability assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 994-1006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Ievhen Ihnatiev, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Front-Mounted Beet Topper Machine for Biomass Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Alvaro Marucci & Elena Di Mattia & Valerio Cristofori & Fabio Recanatesi & Mauro Villarini & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini, 2020. "WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-7, November.
    3. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Artur Przywara & Francesco Santoro & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Anna Pecyna & Simone Pascuzzi, 2020. "Experimental Study of Disc Fertilizer Spreader Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Jinming Liu & Changhao Zeng & Na Wang & Jianfei Shi & Bo Zhang & Changyu Liu & Yong Sun, 2021. "Rapid Biochemical Methane Potential Evaluation of Anaerobic Co-Digestion Feedstocks Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artur Przywara & Francesco Santoro & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Anna Pecyna & Simone Pascuzzi, 2020. "Experimental Study of Disc Fertilizer Spreader Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Ievhen Ihnatiev, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Front-Mounted Beet Topper Machine for Biomass Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Zinoviy Ruzhylo & Ivan Fedosiy & Francesco Santoro, 2020. "A New Spiral Potato Cleaner to Enhance the Removal of Impurities and Soil Clods in Potato Harvesting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Simone Pascuzzi & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro, 2020. "The Concept of a Compact Profile Agricultural Tractor Suitable for Use on Specialised Tree Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
    7. Bartoli, Andrea & Hamelin, Lorie & Rozakis, Stelios & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Brandão, Miguel, 2019. "Coupling economic and GHG emission accounting models to evaluate the sustainability of biogas policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 133-148.
    8. Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Alvaro Marucci & Elena Di Mattia & Valerio Cristofori & Fabio Recanatesi & Mauro Villarini & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini, 2020. "WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-7, November.
    9. Simone Pascuzzi & Volodymyr Bulgakov & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Semjons Ivanovs & Ivan Holovach, 2020. "A Study on the Drift of Spray Droplets Dipped in Airflows with Different Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    11. Giovanna Croxatto Vega & Juliën Voogt & Joshua Sohn & Morten Birkved & Stig Irving Olsen, 2020. "Assessing New Biotechnologies by Combining TEA and TM-LCA for an Efficient Use of Biomass Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, May.
    12. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Iribarren, Diego & García-Gusano, Diego & Dufour, Javier, 2020. "Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessment of energy systems including the use of gas from manure fermentation in the context of the Spanish potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    14. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Is Bioenergy Truly Sustainable When Land-Use-Change (LUC) Emissions Are Accounted for? The Case-Study of Biogas from Agricultural Biomass in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    18. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    20. Huang, Zhi & Su, Bosheng & Wang, Yilin & Yuan, Shuo & Huang, Yupeng & Li, Liang & Cai, Jiahao & Chen, Zhiqiang, 2024. "A novel biogas-driven CCHP system based on chemical reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2724-:d:364326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.