IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i16p4264-d400313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Modelling and Simulation of Waste Gasification-Based Flexible Polygeneration Facilities for Power, Heat and Biofuels Production

Author

Listed:
  • Chaudhary Awais Salman

    (School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, SE 721 23 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Ch Bilal Omer

    (Kot Addu Power Company Limited (KAPCO), Kot Addu 34050, Pakistan)

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the harnessing of energy from waste owing to the increase in global waste generation and inadequate currently implemented waste disposal practices, such as composting, landfilling or dumping. The purpose of this study is to provide a modelling and simulation framework to analyze the technical potential of treating municipal solid waste (MSW) and refuse-derived fuel (RDF) for the polygeneration of biofuels along with district heating (DH) and power. A flexible waste gasification polygeneration facility is proposed in this study. Two types of waste—MSW and RDF—are used as feedstock for the polygeneration process. Three different gasifiers—the entrained flow gasifier (EFG), circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG) and dual fluidized bed gasifier (DFBG)—are compared. The polygeneration process is designed to produce DH, power and biofuels (methane, methanol/dimethyl ether, gasoline or diesel and ammonia). Aspen Plus is used for the modelling and simulation of the polygeneration processes. Four cases with different combinations of DH, power and biofuels are assessed. The EFG shows higher energy efficiency when the polygeneration process provides DH alongside power and biofuels, whereas the DFBG and CFBG show higher efficiency when only power and biofuels are produced. RDF waste shows higher efficiency as feedstock than MSW in polygeneration process.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaudhary Awais Salman & Ch Bilal Omer, 2020. "Process Modelling and Simulation of Waste Gasification-Based Flexible Polygeneration Facilities for Power, Heat and Biofuels Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4264-:d:400313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2011. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2563-2587, August.
    2. Gładysz, Paweł & Saari, Jussi & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2020. "Thermo-ecological cost analysis of cogeneration and polygeneration energy systems - Case study for thermal conversion of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1748-1760.
    3. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    4. Li, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Guoqiang & Yang, Yongping & Zhai, Dailong & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Gang, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of a coal-based polygeneration system with partial gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 201-214.
    5. Tungalag, Azjargal & Lee, BongJu & Yadav, Manoj & Akande, Olugbenga, 2020. "Yield prediction of MSW gasification including minor species through ASPEN plus simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Sustainable polygeneration design and assessment through combined thermodynamic, economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 540-555.
    7. Fan, Junming & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Biomass and coal co-feed power and SNG polygeneration with chemical looping combustion to reduce carbon footprint for sustainable energy development: Process simulation and thermodynamic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 260-269.
    8. Segurado, R. & Pereira, S. & Correia, D. & Costa, M., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 501-514.
    9. Guo, Zhihang & Wang, Qinhui & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of polygeneration system integrating atmospheric pressure coal pyrolysis technology with circulating fluidized bed power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1301-1314.
    10. Buttler, Alexander & Kunze, Christian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2013. "IGCC–EPI: Decentralized concept of a highly load-flexible IGCC power plant for excess power integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 869-879.
    11. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Polygeneration using agricultural waste: Thermodynamic and economic feasibility study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 648-660.
    12. Clausen, Lasse R. & Elmegaard, Brian & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik, 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of small-scale dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol plants based on the efficient two-stage gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5805-5814.
    13. Narvaez, A. & Chadwick, D. & Kershenbaum, L., 2014. "Small-medium scale polygeneration systems: Methanol and power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1109-1117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachele Foffi & Elisa Savuto & Matteo Stante & Roberta Mancini & Katia Gallucci, 2022. "Study of Energy Valorization of Disposable Masks via Thermochemical Processes: Devolatilization Tests and Simulation Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Jerzy Chojnacki & Jan Najser & Krzysztof Rokosz & Vaclav Peer & Jan Kielar & Bogusława Berner, 2020. "Syngas Composition: Gasification of Wood Pellet with Water Steam through a Reactor with Continuous Biomass Feed System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda, 2022. "Decarbonizing Vehicle Transportation with Hydrogen from Biomass Gasification: An Assessment in the Nigerian Urban Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Mohamed, Badr A. & O'Boyle, Marnie & Li, Loretta Y., 2023. "Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    5. Mohamed, Badr A. & Ruan, Roger & Bilal, Muhammad & Periyasamy, Selvakumar & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Rajamohan, Natarajan & Leng, Lijian, 2024. "Sewage sludge co-pyrolysis with agricultural/forest residues: A comparative life-cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Jacek Roman & Robert Wróblewski & Beata Klojzy-Karczmarczyk & Bartosz Ceran, 2023. "Energetic, Economic and Environmental (3E) Analysis of a RES-Waste Gasification Plant with Syngas Storage Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Manuel Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Slum/Informal Settlements Using the PROMETHEE Technique: A Case Study of the Greater Karu Urban Area in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calise, Francesco & de Notaristefani di Vastogirardi, Giulio & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2018. "Simulation of polygeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 290-337.
    2. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    3. Wolfersdorf, Christian & Boblenz, Kristin & Pardemann, Robert & Meyer, Bernd, 2015. "Syngas-based annex concepts for chemical energy storage and improving flexibility of pulverized coal combustion power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 618-627.
    4. Forman, Clemens & Gootz, Matthias & Wolfersdorf, Christian & Meyer, Bernd, 2017. "Coupling power generation with syngas-based chemical synthesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 180-191.
    5. Segurado, R. & Pereira, S. & Correia, D. & Costa, M., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 501-514.
    6. Narvaez, A. & Chadwick, D. & Kershenbaum, L., 2019. "Performance of small-medium scale polygeneration systems for dimethyl ether and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Polygeneration using agricultural waste: Thermodynamic and economic feasibility study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 648-660.
    8. Thallam Thattai, A. & Oldenbroek, V. & Schoenmakers, L. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Experimental model validation and thermodynamic assessment on high percentage (up to 70%) biomass co-gasification at the 253MWe integrated gasification combined cycle power plant in Buggenum, The Neth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 381-393.
    9. Zhao, Haitao & Jiang, Peng & Chen, Zhe & Ezeh, Collins I. & Hong, Yuanda & Guo, Yishan & Zheng, Chenghang & Džapo, Hrvoje & Gao, Xiang & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Improvement of fuel sources and energy products flexibility in coal power plants via energy-cyber-physical-systems approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Wu, Handong & Gao, Lin & Jin, Hongguang & Li, Sheng, 2017. "Low-energy-penalty principles of CO2 capture in polygeneration systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 571-581.
    12. Zhang, Yongliang & Jin, Bo & Zou, Xixian & Zhao, Haibo, 2016. "A clean coal utilization technology based on coal pyrolysis and chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: Principle and experimental validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 181-189.
    13. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    14. Farhat, Karim & Reichelstein, Stefan, 2016. "Economic value of flexible hydrogen-based polygeneration energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 857-870.
    15. Kabalina, Natalia & Costa, Mário & Yang, Weihong & Martin, Andrew, 2018. "Impact of a reduction in heating, cooling and electricity loads on the performance of a polygeneration district heating and cooling system based on waste gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 594-604.
    16. Liu, Yiyuan & Zhu, Qunzhi & Zhang, Tao & Yan, Xuefeng & Duan, Rui, 2020. "Analysis of chemical-looping hydrogen production and power generation system driven by solar energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 863-874.
    17. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Sustainable polygeneration design and assessment through combined thermodynamic, economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 540-555.
    18. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2020. "Energy and economic analysis of a small hybrid solar-geothermal trigeneration system: A dynamic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    19. Marques, Adriano S. & Carvalho, Monica & Ochoa, Alvaro A.V. & Abrahão, Raphael & Santos, Carlos A.C., 2021. "Life cycle assessment and comparative exergoenvironmental evaluation of a micro-trigeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Madurai Elavarasan, Rajvikram & Pugazhendhi, Rishi & Irfan, Muhammad & Mihet-Popa, Lucian & Khan, Irfan Ahmad & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2022. "State-of-the-art sustainable approaches for deeper decarbonization in Europe – An endowment to climate neutral vision," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4264-:d:400313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.