IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p1930-d120029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Experimental Study of a Small Scale Olive Pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration: Energy and Profitability Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Borello

    (DIMA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio M. Pantaleo

    (CPSE—Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
    DISAAT—Dipartimento di Scienze Agro-Ambientali e territoriali, Università di Bari, Via Amendola 165/A, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Michele Caucci

    (DIMA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Benedetta De Caprariis

    (DICMA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica Materiali e Ambiente, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Paolo De Filippis

    (DICMA—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica Materiali e Ambiente, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Nilay Shah

    (CPSE—Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

Abstract

A thermodynamic model of a combined heat and power (CHP) plant, fed by syngas produced by dry olive pomace gasification is here presented. An experimental study is carried out to inform the proposed model. The plant is designed to produce electric power (200 kW el ) and hot-water by using a cogenerative micro gas turbine (micro GT). Before being released, exhausts are used to dry the biomass from 50% to 17% wb. The ChemCad software is used to model the gasification process, and input data to inform the model are taken from experimental tests. The micro GT and cogeneration sections are modeled assuming data from existing commercial plants. The paper analyzes the whole conversion process from wet biomass to heat and power production, reporting energy balances and costs analysis. The investment profitability is assessed in light of the Italian regulations, which include feed-in-tariffs for biomass based electricity generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Borello & Antonio M. Pantaleo & Michele Caucci & Benedetta De Caprariis & Paolo De Filippis & Nilay Shah, 2017. "Modeling and Experimental Study of a Small Scale Olive Pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration: Energy and Profitability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1930-:d:120029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur M. James R. & Wenqiao Yuan & Michael D. Boyette, 2016. "The Effect of Biomass Physical Properties on Top-Lit Updraft Gasification of Woodchips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal & Lahijani, Pooya & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2010. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2852-2862, December.
    3. Lee, Uisung & Balu, Elango & Chung, J.N., 2013. "An experimental evaluation of an integrated biomass gasification and power generation system for distributed power applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 699-708.
    4. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Lucio Zaccariello & Maria Laura Mastellone, 2015. "Fluidized-Bed Gasification of Plastic Waste, Wood, and Their Blends with Coal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Kezhen Qian & Ajay Kumar & Krushna Patil & Danielle Bellmer & Donghai Wang & Wenqiao Yuan & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2013. "Effects of Biomass Feedstocks and Gasification Conditions on the Physiochemical Properties of Char," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Kirubakaran, V. & Sivaramakrishnan, V. & Nalini, R. & Sekar, T. & Premalatha, M. & Subramanian, P., 2009. "A review on gasification of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 179-186, January.
    8. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    9. W. A. Wan Ab Karim Ghani & Reza Alipour Moghadam & M. A. Mohd Salleh & A. B. Alias, 2009. "Air Gasification of Agricultural Waste in a Fluidized Bed Gasifier: Hydrogen Production Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Ahmed, Tigabwa Y. & Ahmad, Murni M. & Yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Khan, Zakir, 2012. "Mathematical and computational approaches for design of biomass gasification for hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2304-2315.
    11. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    12. Ilaria Zambon & Fabrizio Colosimo & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Gallucci & Andrea Rosario Proto & Richard Lord & Andrea Colantoni, 2016. "An Innovative Agro-Forestry Supply Chain for Residual Biomass: Physicochemical Characterisation of Biochar from Olive and Hazelnut Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Pereira, Emanuele Graciosa & da Silva, Jadir Nogueira & de Oliveira, Jofran L. & Machado, Cássio S., 2012. "Sustainable energy: A review of gasification technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4753-4762.
    14. Pantaleo, Antonio & Candelise, Chiara & Bauen, Ausilio & Shah, Nilay, 2014. "ESCO business models for biomass heating and CHP: Profitability of ESCO operations in Italy and key factors assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 237-253.
    15. Kirkels, Arjan F. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2011. "Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 471-481, January.
    16. Sharmina Begum & Mohammad G. Rasul & Delwar Akbar & Naveed Ramzan, 2013. "Performance Analysis of an Integrated Fixed Bed Gasifier Model for Different Biomass Feedstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Ajay Kumar & David D. Jones & Milford A. Hanna, 2009. "Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Gallucci & Raffaele Liberatore & Luca Sapegno & Edoardo Volponi & Paolo Venturini & Franco Rispoli & Enrico Paris & Monica Carnevale & Andrea Colantoni, 2019. "Influence of Oxidant Agent on Syngas Composition: Gasification of Hazelnut Shells through an Updraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Ramos, João S. & Ferreira, Ana F., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    4. Ricardo A. Narváez C. & Richard Blanchard & Roger Dixon & Valeria Ramírez & Diego Chulde, 2018. "Low-Cost Syngas Shifting for Remote Gasifiers: Combination of CO 2 Adsorption and Catalyst Addition in a Novel and Simplified Packed Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Fordham, Julia & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & De Palma, Pietro & Markides, Christos N., 2018. "Integrating cogeneration and intermittent waste-heat recovery in food processing: Microturbines vs. ORC systems in the coffee roasting industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 782-796.
    6. Maria Cristina Cameretti & Alessandro Cappiello & Roberta De Robbio & Raffaele Tuccillo, 2020. "Comparison between Hydrogen and Syngas Fuels in an Integrated Micro Gas Turbine/Solar Field with Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Rukshan Jayathilake & Souman Rudra, 2017. "Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Equivalence Ratio (ER) and Feedstock Particle Size on Birchwood Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Carlos Vargas-Salgado & Elías Hurtado-Pérez & David Alfonso-Solar & Anders Malmquist, 2021. "Empirical Design, Construction, and Experimental Test of a Small-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    6. Tejasvi Sharma & Diego M. Yepes Maya & Francisco Regis M. Nascimento & Yunye Shi & Albert Ratner & Electo E. Silva Lora & Lourival Jorge Mendes Neto & Jose Carlos Escobar Palacios & Rubenildo Vieira A, 2018. "An Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Gasification of Miscanthus Briquettes in a Double-Stage Downdraft Gasifier: Syngas, Tar, and Biochar Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Ramin Khezri & Wan Azlina Wan Ab Karim Ghani & Dayang Radiah Awang Biak & Robiah Yunus & Kiman Silas, 2019. "Experimental Evaluation of Napier Grass Gasification in an Autothermal Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Qitai Eri & Wenzhen Wu & Xinjun Zhao, 2017. "Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    10. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    11. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    12. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    13. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    14. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    16. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    17. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    18. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    19. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    20. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1930-:d:120029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.