IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v91y2018icp869-887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrpooya, Mehdi
  • Khalili, Maryam
  • Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari

Abstract

Worldwide growing demand for energy consumption in recent years arising from industrialization development and increasing earth population has caused more environmental concerns to emerge. On the other hand, specific issues related to the use of fossil fuels as a nonrenewable source of energy has been caused alternative fuels like biomass to be investigated with more concern. Generally, gasification is a process which converts organic matter to gas and tar. Also, through the gasification, biomass as a fuel is converted to the combustible gas (syngas). In this study, modeling and simulation of the biomass gasification process is investigated and analyzed considering 23 different kinds of the biomass sources. The proposed model is based on the Gibbs free energy minimization and the restricted equilibrium method is used for calibration. The process operating performance is analyzed thermodynamically based on the hydrogen production yield. In this regard, effective parameters like temperature of the gasification, air-fuel ratio, steam-biomass ratio and temperature of the air and steam streams are investigated. Gasification temperature and steam-biomass ratio affect the syngas compositions and the heating value significantly. Biomass moisture has the most significant impact on the syngas production efficiency. Also, other parameters which are not very intensive but still have an effect on the syngas production efficiency, are examined. Finally, the process performance is analyzed based on the energy and exergy analysis methods. The obtained results show that, exergy efficiency of drying stage is the highest (about 90.0%) in all cases. Nonetheless, exergy destruction rate for this stage is a great value against the others. Among the selected biomasses, Rice husk type has the greatest exergy destruction rate which is related to the tar combustion and decomposition reactors; respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:869-887
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118303022
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    2. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    3. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    4. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2007. "Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 314-327.
    5. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    6. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    7. Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal & Lahijani, Pooya & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2010. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2852-2862, December.
    8. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    9. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Patrick, David Onoja & Ammar, Muhammad, 2017. "The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 468-476.
    11. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    12. Taheri, M.H. & Mosaffa, A.H. & Farshi, L. Garousi, 2017. "Energy, exergy and economic assessments of a novel integrated biomass based multigeneration energy system with hydrogen production and LNG regasification cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 162-177.
    13. Li, Chunshan & Suzuki, Kenzi, 2009. "Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification--An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 594-604, April.
    14. Tan, Luzhi & Dong, Xiaoming & Gong, Zhiqiang & Wang, Mingtao, 2017. "Investigation on performance of an integrated SOFC-GE-KC power generation system using gaseous fuel from biomass gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 448-461.
    15. Xiang, Yangyang & Zhou, Jingsong & Lin, Bowen & Xue, Xiaoao & Tian, Xingtao & Luo, Zhongyang, 2015. "Exergetic evaluation of renewable light olefins production from biomass via synthetic methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 499-507.
    16. Kalina, Jacek, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of small-scale integrated biomass gasification dual fuel combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2499-2507.
    17. Santhanam, S. & Schilt, C. & Turker, B. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Thermodynamic modeling and evaluation of high efficiency heat pipe integrated biomass Gasifier–Solid Oxide Fuel Cells–Gas Turbine systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 751-764.
    18. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Pal, K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 363-384.
    19. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2017. "Conceptual and basic design of a novel integrated cogeneration power plant energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 516-533.
    20. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    21. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Shahsavan, Mohsen & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2016. "Modeling, energy and exergy analysis of solar chimney power plant-Tehran climate data case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 257-273.
    22. Santos Dalólio, Felipe & da Silva, Jadir Nogueira & Carneiro de Oliveira, Angélica Cássia & Ferreira Tinôco, Ilda de Fátima & Christiam Barbosa, Rúben & Resende, Michael de Oliveira & Teixeira Albino,, 2017. "Poultry litter as biomass energy: A review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 941-949.
    23. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergy analyses of a novel power cycle using the cold of LNG (liquefied natural gas) and low-temperature solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 324-345.
    24. Fan, Junming & Hong, Hui & Zhu, Lin & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "Thermodynamic and environmental evaluation of biomass and coal co-fuelled gasification chemical looping combustion with CO2 capture for combined cooling, heating and power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 861-876.
    25. Thallam Thattai, A. & Oldenbroek, V. & Schoenmakers, L. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Experimental model validation and thermodynamic assessment on high percentage (up to 70%) biomass co-gasification at the 253MWe integrated gasification combined cycle power plant in Buggenum, The Neth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 381-393.
    26. Kirubakaran, V. & Sivaramakrishnan, V. & Nalini, R. & Sekar, T. & Premalatha, M. & Subramanian, P., 2009. "A review on gasification of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 179-186, January.
    27. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    28. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2020. "A deep learning approach for prediction of syngas lower heating value from CFB gasifier in Aspen plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    5. Alexander N. Kozlov & Nikita V. Tomin & Denis N. Sidorov & Electo E. S. Lora & Victor G. Kurbatsky, 2020. "Optimal Operation Control of PV-Biomass Gasifier-Diesel-Hybrid Systems Using Reinforcement Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    7. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    8. Karl, Jürgen & Pröll, Tobias, 2018. "Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 64-78.
    9. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    10. Ibrahim, A. & Veremieiev, S. & Gaskell, P.H., 2022. "An advanced, comprehensive thermochemical equilibrium model of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 912-925.
    11. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    12. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Domenico Borello & Antonio M. Pantaleo & Michele Caucci & Benedetta De Caprariis & Paolo De Filippis & Nilay Shah, 2017. "Modeling and Experimental Study of a Small Scale Olive Pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration: Energy and Profitability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    16. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    18. Ghorbani, Bahram & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghasemzadeh, Hossein, 2018. "Investigation of a hybrid water desalination, oxy-fuel power generation and CO2 liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1105-1119.
    19. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:869-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.