IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1739-d949592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the Modeling and Prediction of the Yield of Oilseed Crops: A Multi-Machine Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdieh Parsaeian

    (Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran)

  • Mohammad Rahimi

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

  • Abbas Rohani

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

  • Shaneka S. Lawson

    (USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC), Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA)

Abstract

Crop seed yield modeling and prediction can act as a key approach in the precision agriculture industry, enabling the reliable assessment of the effectiveness of agro-traits. Here, multiple machine learning (ML) techniques are employed to predict sesame ( Sesamum indicum L.) seed yields (SSY) using agro-morphological features. Various ML models were applied, coupled with the PCA (principal component analysis) method to compare them with the original ML models, in order to evaluate the prediction efficiency. The Gaussian process regression (GPR) and radial basis function neural network (RBF-NN) models exhibited the most accurate SSY predictions, with determination coefficients, or R 2 values, of 0.99 and 0.91, respectfully. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) obtained using the ML models ranged between 0 and 0.30 t/ha (metric tons/hectare) for the varied modeling process phases. The estimation of the sesame seed yield with the coupled PCA-ML models improved the performance accuracy. According to the k-fold process, we utilized the datasets with the lowest error rates to ensure the continued accuracy of the GPR and RBF models. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the capsule number per plant (CPP), seed number per capsule (SPC), and 1000-seed weight (TSW) were the most significant seed yield determinants.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdieh Parsaeian & Mohammad Rahimi & Abbas Rohani & Shaneka S. Lawson, 2022. "Towards the Modeling and Prediction of the Yield of Oilseed Crops: A Multi-Machine Learning Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1739-:d:949592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khalied Albarrak & Yonis Gulzar & Yasir Hamid & Abid Mehmood & Arjumand Bano Soomro, 2022. "A Deep Learning-Based Model for Date Fruit Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    3. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Shah, Ajay, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of hydroprocessed renewable jet fuel production from pennycress oilseed," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Vinushi Amaratunga & Lasini Wickramasinghe & Anushka Perera & Jeevani Jayasinghe & Upaka Rathnayake, 2020. "Artificial Neural Network to Estimate the Paddy Yield Prediction Using Climatic Data," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, July.
    5. Masako Ikegami & Zijian Wang, 2021. "Does energy aid reduce CO2 emission intensities in developing countries?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 343-358, October.
    6. Soltanali, Hamzeh & Nikkhah, Amin & Rohani, Abbas, 2017. "Energy audit of Iranian kiwifruit production using intelligent systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 646-654.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hung Vo Thanh & Sajad Ebrahimnia Taremsari & Benyamin Ranjbar & Hossein Mashhadimoslem & Ehsan Rahimi & Mohammad Rahimi & Ali Elkamel, 2023. "Hydrogen Storage on Porous Carbon Adsorbents: Rediscovery by Nature-Derived Algorithms in Random Forest Machine Learning Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Rahimi, Mohammad & Mashhadimoslem, Hossein & Vo Thanh, Hung & Ranjbar, Benyamin & Safarzadeh Khosrowshahi, Mobin & Rohani, Abbas & Elkamel, Ali, 2023. "Yield prediction and optimization of biomass-based products by multi-machine learning schemes: Neural, regression and function-based techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Baoshan Wang & Qingxi Liao & Lei Wang & Caixia Shu & Mei Cao & Wenbin Du, 2023. "Design and Test of Air-Assisted Seed-Guiding Device of Precision Hill-Seeding Centralized Seed-Metering Device for Sesame," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Chen & Xiaoyulong Chen & Jianwu Lin & Renyong Pan & Tengbao Cao & Jitong Cai & Dianzhi Yu & Tomislav Cernava & Xin Zhang, 2022. "DFCANet: A Novel Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Model for Corn Disease Identification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    3. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    4. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    5. Rui Ma & Jia Wang & Wei Zhao & Hongjie Guo & Dongnan Dai & Yuliang Yun & Li Li & Fengqi Hao & Jinqiang Bai & Dexin Ma, 2022. "Identification of Maize Seed Varieties Using MobileNetV2 with Improved Attention Mechanism CBAM," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. David Breitenmoser & Francesco Cerutti & Gernot Butterweck & Malgorzata Magdalena Kasprzak & Sabine Mayer, 2023. "Emulator-based Bayesian inference on non-proportional scintillation models by compton-edge probing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    10. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "Real-time high-fidelity reliability updating with equality information using adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    14. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Al Ali, Hannah & Daneshkhah, Alireza & Boutayeb, Abdesslam & Malunguza, Noble Jahalamajaha & Mukandavire, Zindoga, 2022. "Exploring dynamical properties of a Type 1 diabetes model using sensitivity approaches," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 324-342.
    16. Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval & Sami Khanal & Ajay Shah, 2023. "Assessment of Potential Pennycress Availability and Suitable Sites for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refineries in Ohio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Lu Lu & Wei Liu & Wenbo Yang & Manyu Zhao & Tinghao Jiang, 2022. "Lightweight Corn Seed Disease Identification Method Based on Improved ShuffleNetV2," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Gersbach, Hans & Liu, Yulin & Tischhauser, Martin, 2021. "Versatile forward guidance: escaping or switching?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Chen, Qiuwen & Ma, Xiaohan & Hu, Jiayu & Zhang, Xiaohong, 2023. "Comparison of comprehensive performance of kiwifruit production in China, Iran, and Italy based on emergy and carbon emissions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    20. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1739-:d:949592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.