IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v185y2024ics0960077924006659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergence of pathological beta oscillation and its uncertainty quantification in a time-delayed feedback Parkinsonian model

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yaqian
  • Nakao, Hiroya
  • Kang, Yanmei

Abstract

It has been experimentally found that transmission delays play an important role in the emergence of excessively synchronized beta oscillations (13–30 Hz) related to the onset of Parkinson’s symptoms. In order to clarify the dynamical mechanism underlying beta oscillations, we generalize a conventional resonance model based on the subthalamic nucleus (STN)-external segment of globus pallidus (GPe)-cortex circuit to a feedback Parkinsonian model by incorporating the transmission delay within the basal ganglia (STN-GPe circuit) and the transmission delay from the STN to the cortex. By combining the theory of center manifolds and normal forms with numerical simulations, it is revealed how the pathological beta oscillations occur as the transmission delays increase beyond critical values. Furthermore, by regarding the transmission delays and the connection weights as random variables, variance-based sensitivity analysis is performed based on polynomial chaos expansion. It is identified that the transmission delays and connection strength in the long STN-cortex circuit are more significant than those in the STN-GPe circuit for beta oscillations. Our results also suggest that the severity of the Parkinsonian symptoms could be alleviated if a clinical therapy, such as deep brain stimulation, can enlarge the transmission delays in the STN-GPe and STN-cortex circuits simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yaqian & Nakao, Hiroya & Kang, Yanmei, 2024. "Emergence of pathological beta oscillation and its uncertainty quantification in a time-delayed feedback Parkinsonian model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924006659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924006659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dietmar Plenz & Stephen T. Kital, 1999. "A basal ganglia pacemaker formed by the subthalamic nucleus and external globus pallidus," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6745), pages 677-682, August.
    2. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    3. Andrea Saltelli, 2002. "Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 579-590, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. WoongHee Jung & Aikaterini P. Kyprioti & Ehsan Adeli & Alexandros A. Taflanidis, 2023. "Exploring the sensitivity of probabilistic surge estimates to forecast errors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1371-1409, January.
    3. Li, Min & Wang, Ruo-Qian & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Efficient dimension reduction and surrogate-based sensitivity analysis for expensive models with high-dimensional outputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2023. "Extended sample-based approach for efficient sensitivity analysis of group of random variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Barry Anderson & Emanuele Borgonovo & Marzio Galeotti & Roberto Roson, 2014. "Uncertainty in Climate Change Modeling: Can Global Sensitivity Analysis Be of Help?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 271-293, February.
    6. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Elmar Plischke & Emanuele Borgonovo, 2020. "Fighting the Curse of Sparsity: Probabilistic Sensitivity Measures From Cumulative Distribution Functions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2639-2660, December.
    8. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    9. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    10. Shang, Xiaobing & Wang, Lipeng & Fang, Hai & Lu, Lingyun & Zhang, Zhi, 2024. "Active Learning of Ensemble Polynomial Chaos Expansion Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    12. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    13. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    14. Marco Percoco, 2006. "A Note on the Inoperability Input‐Output Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 589-594, June.
    15. Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Longfei Tian, 2013. "A modified variance-based importance measure and its solution by state dependent parameter," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(1), pages 3-15, February.
    16. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    18. Kunz, Nathan & Chesney, Thomas & Trautrims, Alexander & Gold, Stefan, 2023. "Adoption and transferability of joint interventions to fight modern slavery in food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. David Breitenmoser & Francesco Cerutti & Gernot Butterweck & Malgorzata Magdalena Kasprzak & Sabine Mayer, 2023. "Emulator-based Bayesian inference on non-proportional scintillation models by compton-edge probing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924006659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.