IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i4p80-d276179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Management in Finnish and Norwegian Government Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Jan-Erik Johanson

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland)

  • Åge Johnsen

    (Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St. Olavs Plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
    The Norwegian Defence University College, PO Box 1550 Sentrum, NO-0015 Oslo, Norway)

  • Elias Pekkola

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland)

  • Stephen Affleck Reid

    (NLA University College Oslo, PO Box 7153 St. Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
    The Open University Business School, PO Box 197, Milton Keynes MK7 6BJ, UK)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyse the design and implementation of strategic planning and performance management in governmental agencies in two Nordic countries, Finland and Norway. Nordic countries are an interesting study from a comparative perspective because while they are commonly assumed to have been high-intensity new public management reformers, they are also commonly assumed to have a distinct public management tradition. Moreover, these two countries are interesting to study because within the Nordic public management tradition, Finland and Norway specifically represent two different public management traditions. Finland belongs to the Eastern Nordic public management tradition, with an emphasis on decentralisation and agency autonomy, while Norway belongs to the Western Nordic public management tradition, with an emphasis on hierarchical governance, and hence, much performance management and reporting. Therefore, we expected to find more decentralised strategic management and an emphasis on evaluation in Finland, and more central, planning-like strategic management and reporting in Norway. Our comparison shows that both countries had mandatory strategic planning and utilised decentralised strategic planning in government agencies. The stronger legal orientation in the public administration in Finland, however, made strategic changes more complicated in Finland than in Norway.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan-Erik Johanson & Åge Johnsen & Elias Pekkola & Stephen Affleck Reid, 2019. "Strategic Management in Finnish and Norwegian Government Agencies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:80-:d:276179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raili Pollanen & Ahmed Abdel-Maksoud & Said Elbanna & Habib Mahama, 2017. "Relationships between strategic performance measures, strategic decision-making, and organizational performance: empirical evidence from Canadian public organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 725-746, May.
    2. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Said Elbanna & Rhys Andrews & Raili Pollanen, 2016. "Strategic Planning and Implementation Success in Public Service Organizations: Evidence from Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 1017-1042, August.
    4. Sue Llewellyn & Emma Tappin, 2003. "Strategy in the Public Sector: Management in the Wilderness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 955-982, June.
    5. Bert George & Sebastian Desmidt & Eva Cools & Anita Prinzie, 2018. "Cognitive styles, user acceptance and commitment to strategic plans in public organizations: an empirical analysis," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 340-359, March.
    6. Edoardo Ongaro & Ewan Ferlie, 2019. "Exploring Strategy-Making in ‘Non-New Public Management’ Public Services Settings: The Case of European Union Agencies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    8. Jesper Rosenberg Hansen & Ewan Ferlie, 2016. "Applying Strategic Management Theories in Public Sector Organizations: Developing a typology," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Jordan Tama, 2018. "How an agency’s responsibilities and political context shape government strategic planning: evidence from US Federal agency quadrennial reviews," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 377-396, March.
    10. Jonathan Boston & June Pallot, 1997. "Linking strategy and performance: Developments in the New Zealand public sector," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 382-404.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla Fontes & Joaquim Leite & Paula Odete Fernandes, 2022. "Structural Autonomy and Management Performance: An Influence Reinforced in the Particular Context of Portuguese Public Secondary Schools," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nyamori, Robert Ochoki & Lawrence, Stewart R. & Perera, Hector B., 2012. "Revitalising local democracy: A social capital analysis in the context of a New Zealand local authority," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 572-594.
    2. Bienmali Kombate & Muganga Emmanuel & Kouadio Konan Richard, 2021. "The Implication of the Strategic Implementation Style and Middle Management Effort in Public Organization Strategic Management Implementation and Its Organizational Performance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 125-125, December.
    3. Meirbek Mazhitov & Md. Aftab Uddin & Monowar Mahmood & Alexandr Ostrovskiy, 2024. "Competitive Advantages Through Strategy Implementation: the Role of People, Plan, and Process," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 861-883, September.
    4. Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Höglund, Linda & Svärdsten, Fredrik, 2018. "Strategy work in the public sector—A balancing act of competing discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 225-232.
    6. Raphael Zumofen, 2016. "Public accountability: a summary analysis [Accountability publique - Une analyse synthétique]," Post-Print hal-03623871, HAL.
    7. James Wan & Ling Wang & Raafat Saade & Hong Guan & Hao Liu, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of Strategic Management in Inter-Governmental Organization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Ian Hodge & William M. Adams, 2016. "Short-Term Projects versus Adaptive Governance: Conflicting Demands in the Management of Ecological Restoration," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2022. "The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 371-402, September.
    10. Rosta, Miklós, 2013. "New Public Management: opportunity for the Centre, thread for the Periphery," MPRA Paper 68474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    12. Mr. Richard I Allen & Yasemin Hurcan & Peter Murphy & Mr. Maximilien Queyranne & Mr. Sami Yläoutinen, 2015. "The Evolving Functions and Organization of Finance Ministries," IMF Working Papers 2015/232, International Monetary Fund.
    13. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Hajra Malik & Hui Nee Au Yong & Zam Zuriyati Mohamad & Charles Ramendran S. P. R. & Chee Yin Yip & Chee Yang Fong & Mobashar Rehman & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Sustainable Smart Homes and Community Happiness in the Malaysian Context," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Ferry, Laurence & Zakaria, Zamzulaila & Zakaria, Zarina & Slack, Richard, 2018. "Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 170-183.
    16. Cullmann, Astrid & Stiel, Caroline, 2022. "Cost and productivity effects of demographic changes on local water service," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 79, pages 1-35.
    17. Ahgren, Bengt, 2010. "Competition and integration in Swedish health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 91-97, July.
    18. Lagerlöf, Helena & Eriksson, Lena & Sager, Morten, 2024. "Organizing implementation in healthcare: Balancing orders of worth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    19. Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2014. "La relazione tra il livello di coinvolgimento nel processo di budget, il commitment verso gli obiettivi, la soddisfazione lavorativa e i relativi risvolti sulla performance manageriale. I risultati di," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 9-34.
    20. Graham Scott & Ian Ball & Tony Dale, 1997. "New Zealand's public sector management reform: Implications for the United States," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 357-381.
    21. Auranen, Otto & Nieminen, Mika, 2010. "University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 822-834, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:80-:d:276179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.