IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v10y2020i1p15-d330250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing the Relationship between Personal Values and Sustainability—A TMO Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad A. Rickaby

    (Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Construction Engineering, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Jacqueline Glass

    (The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Scott Fernie

    (Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Construction Engineering, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

Abstract

Sustainability is associated with many contemporary challenges facing society, prompting sustainability initiatives and research in this field. An emerging strand of research has sought to investigate sustainability as a function of values. Given that values determine and predict perceptions, attitudes and behaviors, understanding employees’ underlying values would provide important insights on how values relate to sustainability-related actions. However, there is a gap in knowledge around individual actors’ roles as influencers or change agents for sustainability, particularly in a construction project context. Drawing on values theory, this exploratory research addresses this gap by conceptualizing the relationship between personal values and sustainability performance. A Temporary Multiple Organization (TMO) (a major infrastructure project in the UK) was used as the case study. An adapted version of Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) was used to measure and analyze the personal values of employees with professional and managerial roles. Statistical and multidimensional scaling analysis were deployed to analyze the responses. Given the lack of theory and research in a construction management context, the potential significance and implications of the findings were explored and analyzed by drawing on existing empirical studies around values. This enabled the development of six theoretical concepts (‘Feeling of Oneness’, ‘Moral Obligation’, ‘Creativity’, ‘Challenge’, ‘Change’ and ‘Compliance’) latterly expressed as propositions. This novel conceptualization has the potential to explain and articulate the relationship between personal values and sustainability performance. This research has both practical and theoretical implications, as it is the first to explain the role of personal values in enabling projects to deliver sustainability in a TMO context.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad A. Rickaby & Jacqueline Glass & Scott Fernie, 2020. "Conceptualizing the Relationship between Personal Values and Sustainability—A TMO Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:15-:d:330250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Interligi, Lisa, 2010. "Compliance culture: A conceptual framework," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, May.
    2. Ivan Malbašić & Carlos Rey & Vojko Potočan, 2015. "Balanced Organizational Values: From Theory to Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 437-446, August.
    3. Randall, Donna M., 1993. "Cross-cultural research on organizational commitment: A review and application of Hofstede's Value Survey Module," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 91-110, January.
    4. Richard V. Adkisson, 2009. "The Economy as an Open System: An Institutionalist Framework for Economic Development," Springer Books, in: Tara Natarajan & Wolfram Elsner & Scott Fullwiler (ed.), Institutional Analysis and Praxis, pages 25-38, Springer.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Barry Posner, 2010. "Another Look at the Impact of Personal and Organizational Values Congruency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 535-541, December.
    7. Xiaoxing Zhang & Simon Austin & Jacqueline Glass & Grant Mills, 2008. "Toward collective organizational values: a case study in UK construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 1009-1028.
    8. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Households," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 53-64, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Grunert, Suzanne C. & Juhl, Hans Jorn, 1995. "Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 39-62, March.
    10. Rice, Gillian, 2006. "Individual values, Organizational Context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from Egyptian organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 233-241, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zlatko Nedelko & Vojko Potocan, 2021. "Sustainability of Organizations: The Contribution of Personal Values to Democratic Leadership Behavior Focused on the Sustainability of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Shraddha Yadav & Yingjiao Xu & Helmut Hergeth, 2024. "Walking the Talk: Unraveling the Influence of the Sustainability Features of Leather Alternatives on Consumer Behavior toward Running Shoes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Aleksandra Hlastec & Damijan Mumel & Lidija Hauptman, 2023. "Is There a Relationship between Self-Enhancement, Conservation and Personal Tax Culture?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Adam P. Balcerzak & Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, 2020. "Projection of SDGs in Codes of Ethics—Case Study about Lost in Translation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Gabriel-Mugurel Dragomir & Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Liliana Cismariu, 2020. "Engineering Students’ Human Values as Rhizomatic Lines of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Malbasic & Nikolina Posaric, 2017. "A Comparison of the Organizational Values of the World's Largest Companies with the Organizational Values of Large Croatian Companies: A Balanced Approach," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    2. Grebitus, Carola & Steiner, Bodo & Veeman, Michele, 2015. "The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: Insights from Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 84-91.
    3. Jaejin Lee & Jihye Kim, 2016. "The Effect of Consumer Characteristics on the Cause-Related Marketing Campaign: The Role of Personal Life Values," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-82, August.
    4. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Seong-Gak Lee & Hyeon-Jin Jo & Dong-Woo Koo & Sae-Mi Lee, 2022. "Conceptual Similarities and Empirical Differences in Theoretical Approaches to Personal Values and Cultural Values Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior in Hospitality and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Cindy G Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2021. ""Not tested on animals": How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers?," Post-Print hal-03379593, HAL.
    7. Guang-Wen Zheng & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Syed Shah Alam & Alvina Akter, 2020. "Perceived Environmental Responsibilities and Green Buying Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Daniela Bolzani & Maw Der Foo, 2018. "The “why” of international entrepreneurship: uncovering entrepreneurs’ personal values," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 639-666, October.
    9. Thogersen, John & Olander, Folke, 2002. "Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 605-630, October.
    10. Alencar Bravo & Darli Vieira & Thais Ayres Rebello, 2022. "The Origins, Evolution, Current State, and Future of Green Products and Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Kumar, Bipul, 2012. "Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach to Understand the Purchasing Behaviour for Environmentally Sustainable Products," IIMA Working Papers WP2012-12-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Sadiq, Muhammad Ahsan & Rajeswari, Balasundaram & Ansari, Lubna & Danish Kirmani, Mohd, 2021. "The role of food eating values and exploratory behaviour traits in predicting intention to consume organic foods: An extended planned behaviour approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Vishal Kumar Laheri & Purushottam Kumar Arya, 2015. "A Study on Consumer Decision towards Purchase of Organic Food Products: A Case Study of Delhi," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 6(2), pages 84-87, May.
    14. Najla Gonzaga Ribeiro & Edar Silva Añaña & Belem Barbosa, 2022. "The Influence of Human Values, Environmental Awareness, and Attitudes on the Intention to Purchase Cannabis-Based Skincare Cosmetics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Abdullah Al Mamun & Fazal Ali Syed & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Zhan Su, 2018. "Environmental Knowledge, Awareness, and Business School Students’ Intentions to Purchase Green Vehicles in Emerging Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Evrim ERDOĞAN YAZAR & Murat BURUCUOĞLU, 2019. "Consumer Attitude towards Organic Foods: A Multigroup Analysis across Genders," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 176-196, November.
    17. Smith, Samantha & Paladino, Angela, 2010. "Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 93-104.
    18. Shuchita Bakshi & Nikita Dogra & Anil Gupta, 2019. "What motivates posting online travel reviews? Integrating gratifications with technological acceptance factors," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 25(2), pages 335-354, December.
    19. Thi Thu Huong Nguyen & Zhi Yang & Thi Thuy Nga Nguyen & Cao Thi Thanh, 2019. "Theory of Planned Behavior Approach to Understand the Influence of Green Perceived Risk on Consumers' Green Product Purchase Intentions in an Emerging Country," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 138-147.
    20. Peter Walder & Franz Sinabell & Fabian Unterlass & Andreas Niedermayr & Denisa Fulgeanu & Martin Kapfer & Michael Melcher & Jochen Kantelhardt, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Farmers’ Innovativeness and Their Values and Aims," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:15-:d:330250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.