IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v92y2016ipbp148-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoduy, D.
  • Hoang, N.H.
  • Vu, H.L.
  • Watling, D.

Abstract

The Dynamic System Optimum (DSO) traffic assignment problem aims to determine a time-dependent routing pattern of travellers in a network such that the given time-dependent origin-destination demands are satisfied and the total travel time is at a minimum, assuming some model for dynamic network loading. The network kinematic wave model is now widely accepted as such a model, given its realism in reproducing phenomena such as transient queues and spillback to upstream links. An attractive solution strategy for DSO based on such a model is to reformulate as a set of side constraints apply a standard solver, and to this end two methods have been previously proposed, one based on the discretisation scheme known as the Cell Transmission Model (CTM), and the other based on the Link Transmission Model (LTM) derived from variational theory. In the present paper we aim to combine the advantages of CTM (in tracking time-dependent congestion formation within a link) with those of LTM (avoiding cell discretisation, providing a more computationally attractive with much fewer constraints). The motivation for our work is the previously-reported possibility for DSO to have multiple solutions, which differ in where queues are formed and dissipated in the network. Our aim is to find DSO solutions that optimally distribute the congestion over links inside the network which essentially eliminate avoidable queue spillbacks. In order to do so, we require more information than the LTM can offer, but wish to avoid the computational burden of CTM for DSO. We thus adopt an extension of the LTM called the Two-regime Transmission Model (TTM), which is consistent with LTM at link entries and exits but which is additionally able to accurately track the spatial and temporal formation of the congestion boundary within a link (which we later show to be a critical element, relative to LTM). We set out the theoretical background necessary for the formulation of the network-level TTM as a set of linear side constraints. Numerical experiments are used to illustrate the application of the method to determine DSO solutions avoiding spillbacks, reduce/eliminate the congestion and to show the distinctive elements of adopting TTM over LTM. Furthermore, in comparison to a fine-level CTM-based DSO method, our formulation is seen to significantly reduce the number of linear constraints while maintaining a reasonable accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoduy, D. & Hoang, N.H. & Vu, H.L. & Watling, D., 2016. "Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 148-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:92:y:2016:i:pb:p:148-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261515002556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Wei & Zhang, H.M., 2014. "System optimal dynamic traffic assignment: Properties and solution procedures in the case of a many-to-one network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Rohde, Jannis, 2011. "Operational macroscopic modeling of complex urban road intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 903-922, July.
    3. Satish Ukkusuri & S. Waller, 2008. "Linear Programming Models for the User and System Optimal Dynamic Network Design Problem: Formulations, Comparisons and Extensions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 383-406, December.
    4. Tampère, Chris M.J. & Corthout, Ruben & Cattrysse, Dirk & Immers, Lambertus H., 2011. "A generic class of first order node models for dynamic macroscopic simulation of traffic flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 289-309, January.
    5. Smits, Erik-Sander & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Pel, Adam J. & van Arem, Bart, 2015. "A family of macroscopic node models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-39.
    6. Carey, Malachy & Watling, David, 2012. "Dynamic traffic assignment approximating the kinematic wave model: System optimum, marginal costs, externalities and tolls," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 634-648.
    7. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    8. Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos, 2000. "A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, February.
    9. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    10. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "On the Variational Theory of Traffic Flow: Well-Posedness, Duality and Applications," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt61v1r1qq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    12. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2005. "A variational formulation of kinematic waves: basic theory and complex boundary conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 187-196, February.
    13. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part III: Multi-destination flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 305-313, August.
    14. Lo, Hong K. & Szeto, W. Y., 2002. "A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 421-443, June.
    15. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 289-303, August.
    16. Jin, Wen-Long, 2015. "Continuous formulations and analytical properties of the link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 88-103.
    17. Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Han, Lanshan & Doan, Kien, 2012. "Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1657-1684.
    18. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    19. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2005. "Macroscopic arc performance models with capacity constraints for within-day dynamic traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 319-338, May.
    20. Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Pang, Jong-Shi & Liu, Henry X. & Ma, Rui, 2012. "Modeling and solving continuous-time instantaneous dynamic user equilibria: A differential complementarity systems approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 389-408.
    21. Osorio, Carolina & Flötteröd, Gunnar & Bierlaire, Michel, 2011. "Dynamic network loading: A stochastic differentiable model that derives link state distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1410-1423.
    22. Malachy Carey & Y. Ge, 2012. "Comparison of Methods for Path Flow Reassignment for Dynamic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 337-376, September.
    23. Ma, Rui & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Pang, Jong-Shi, 2014. "Continuous-time dynamic system optimum for single-destination traffic networks with queue spillbacks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 98-122.
    24. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 281-287, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crawford, F. & Watling, D.P. & Connors, R.D., 2017. "A statistical method for estimating predictable differences between daily traffic flow profiles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 196-213.
    2. Hoang, Nam H. & Vu, Hai L. & Lo, Hong K., 2018. "An informed user equilibrium dynamic traffic assignment problem in a multiple origin-destination stochastic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 207-230.
    3. Malachy Carey & Paul Humphreys & Marie McHugh & Ronan McIvor, 2018. "Consistency and Inconsistency Between the Fundamental Relationships on Which Different Traffic Assignment Models Are Based," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1548-1569, December.
    4. Du, Jinxiao & Ma, Wei, 2024. "Maximin headway control of automated vehicles for system optimal dynamic traffic assignment in general networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Ngoduy, Dong & Nguyen, Cuong H.P. & Lee, Seunghyeon & Zheng, Zuduo & Lo, Hong K., 2024. "A dynamic system optimal dedicated lane design for connected and autonomous vehicles in a heterogeneous urban transport network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Long, Jiancheng & Wang, Chao & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Dynamic system optimum simultaneous route and departure time choice problems: Intersection-movement-based formulations and comparisons," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 166-206.
    7. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    8. Wang, Guanfeng & Jia, Hongfei & Feng, Tao & Tian, Jingjing & Wu, Ruiyi & Gao, Heyao & Liu, Chao, 2024. "Modelling the dual dynamic traffic flow evolution with information perception differences between human-driven vehicles and connected autonomous vehicles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 640(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ke Han & Gabriel Eve & Terry L. Friesz, 2019. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibria on Large-Scale Networks with Software Implementation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 869-902, September.
    2. Himpe, Willem & Corthout, Ruben & Tampère, M.J. Chris, 2016. "An efficient iterative link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 170-190.
    3. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2019. "Continuous-time general link transmission model with simplified fanning, Part II: Event-based algorithm for networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 471-501.
    4. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    5. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Raadsen, Mark P.H., 2019. "Continuous-time general link transmission model with simplified fanning, Part I: Theory and link model formulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 442-470.
    6. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "An intersection-movement-based stochastic dynamic user optimal route choice model for assessing network performance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-217.
    7. Wang, Peirong (Slade) & Li, Pengfei (Taylor) & Chowdhury, Farzana R. & Zhang, Li & Zhou, Xuesong, 2020. "A mixed integer programming formulation and scalable solution algorithms for traffic control coordination across multiple intersections based on vehicle space-time trajectories," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 266-304.
    8. Canepa, Edward S. & Claudel, Christian G., 2017. "Networked traffic state estimation involving mixed fixed-mobile sensor data using Hamilton-Jacobi equations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 686-709.
    9. Jin, Wen-Long, 2015. "Continuous formulations and analytical properties of the link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 88-103.
    10. van der Gun, Jeroen P.T. & Pel, Adam J. & van Arem, Bart, 2017. "Extending the Link Transmission Model with non-triangular fundamental diagrams and capacity drops," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 154-178.
    11. Mohebifard, Rasool & Hajbabaie, Ali, 2019. "Optimal network-level traffic signal control: A benders decomposition-based solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 252-274.
    12. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Liu, Jiangtao & Qu, Yunchao & Peeta, Srinivas & Rouphail, Nagui M. & Zhou, Xuesong, 2016. "Eco-system optimal time-dependent flow assignment in a congested network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 217-239.
    13. Friesz, Terry L. & Han, Ke & Neto, Pedro A. & Meimand, Amir & Yao, Tao, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium based on a hydrodynamic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-126.
    14. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2016. "An efficient and exact event-based algorithm for solving simplified first order dynamic network loading problems in continuous time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 191-210.
    15. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    16. Wang, Yi & Szeto, W.Y. & Han, Ke & Friesz, Terry L., 2018. "Dynamic traffic assignment: A review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 370-394.
    17. Ma, Rui & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Szeto, W.Y., 2017. "Emission modeling and pricing on single-destination dynamic traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 255-283.
    18. Yu, Hao & Ma, Rui & Zhang, H. Michael, 2018. "Optimal traffic signal control under dynamic user equilibrium and link constraints in a general network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 302-325.
    19. Tumash, Liudmila & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Delle Monache, Maria Laura, 2022. "Multi-directional continuous traffic model for large-scale urban networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 374-402.
    20. Jin, Wen-Long & Gan, Qi-Jian & Lebacque, Jean-Patrick, 2015. "A kinematic wave theory of capacity drop," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 316-329.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:92:y:2016:i:pb:p:148-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.