IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v51y2000i6d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing schedule performance and reliability for train stations

Author

Listed:
  • M Carey

    (University of Ulster)

  • S Carville

    (University of Ulster)

Abstract

On busy congested rail networks, randomdelays of trains are prevalent, and these delays have knock-on effects which result in a significant or substantial proportion of scheduled services being delayed or rescheduled. Here we develop and experiment with a simulation model to predict the probability distributions of these knock-on delays at stations, when faced with typical patterns of on-the-day exogenous delays. These methods can be used to test and compare the reliability of proposed schedules, or schedule changes, before adopting them. They can also be used to explore how schedule reliability may be affected by proposed changes in operating policies, for example, changes in minimum headways or dwell times, or changes in the infrastructure such as, layout of lines, platforms or signals. This model generates a reliability analysis for each train type, line and platform. We can also use the model to explore some policy issues, and to show how punctuality and reliability are affected by changes in the distributions of exogenous delays.

Suggested Citation

  • M Carey & S Carville, 2000. "Testing schedule performance and reliability for train stations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(6), pages 666-682, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:51:y:2000:i:6:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600939
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600939
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sels, P. & Vansteenwegen, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Waquet, B. & Joubert, A., 2014. "The train platforming problem: The infrastructure management company perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 55-72.
    2. Vromans, Michiel J.C.M. & Dekker, Rommert & Kroon, Leo G., 2006. "Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 647-665, July.
    3. Krüger, Niclas A. & Vierth , Inge & Fakhraei Roudsari, Farzad, 2013. "Spatial, temporal and size distribution of freight train delays: evidence from Sweden," Working papers in Transport Economics 2013:8, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    4. Carey, Malachy & Carville, Sinead, 2003. "Scheduling and platforming trains at busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 195-224, March.
    5. Carey, Malachy & Crawford, Ivan, 2007. "Scheduling trains on a network of busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 159-178, February.
    6. Huang, Ping & Wen, Chao & Fu, Liping & Lessan, Javad & Jiang, Chaozhe & Peng, Qiyuan & Xu, Xinyue, 2020. "Modeling train operation as sequences: A study of delay prediction with operation and weather data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Delorme, Xavier & Gandibleux, Xavier & Rodriguez, Joaquín, 2009. "Stability evaluation of a railway timetable at station level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 780-790, June.
    8. Eva Nedeliakova & Maria Hudakova & Matej Masar & Lenka Lizbetinova & Renata Stasiak-Betlejewska & Peter Šulko, 2020. "Sustainability of Railway Undertaking Services with Lean Philosophy in Risk Management—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-28, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:51:y:2000:i:6:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.