IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v35y2013i4p306-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The innovation big picture: Including effectiveness dependencies, efficiency dependencies, and potential negative effects within the framing of new technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Fox, Stephen

Abstract

Cycles of hype and disappointment are frequently observed in relation to new technologies. Hype draws attention to potential positive effects while excluding or under emphasizing a new technology's dependencies on other factors and its potential negative effects. Thus, hype presents a partial picture of technological innovation. In this paper, it is argued that dependencies and potential negative effects should be, and can be, included in the framing of new technologies. First, the limitations of hype are described with references to cases. Next, a template is provided to summarize big picture innovation framing. Dependencies for effectiveness and dependencies for efficient operation are included. This is because the potential of technological innovations to bring about positive effects is often dependent upon extraneous factors. Also, their efficient operation is often dependent upon many inter-related technological components. Potential negative effects are also included. Big picture framing is contrasted with the partial picture provided by hype. Then, examples of dependencies and potential negative effects are described for a range of technologies. Subsequently, a full example of big picture framing is provided for a hyped technology. In conclusion, it is argued that big picture framing can be a more informative starting point for understanding the potential of new technologies than vague hyperbole.

Suggested Citation

  • Fox, Stephen, 2013. "The innovation big picture: Including effectiveness dependencies, efficiency dependencies, and potential negative effects within the framing of new technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 306-314.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:35:y:2013:i:4:p:306-314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X13000614
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bakker, Sjoerd, 2010. "The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6540-6544, November.
    2. Hempell, Thomas, 2002. "What's Spurious, What's Real? Measuring the Productivity Impacts of ICT at the Firm-Level," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-42, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Fox, Stephen, 2008. "Evaluating potential investments in new technologies: Balancing assessments of potential benefits with assessments of potential disbenefits, reliability and utilization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1197-1218.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Nicola J. Bown & A. John Maule & Keith W. Glaister & Alan D. Pearman, 1999. "Breaking the frame: an analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(10), pages 977-985, October.
    6. Highhouse, Scott & Yuce, Payam, 1996. "Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 159-167, February.
    7. Delgado, Gian Carlo, 2010. "Economics and governance of nanomaterials: potential and risks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 137-144.
    8. Dijk, Marc, 2011. "Technological frames of car engines," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 165-180.
    9. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shih-Wen Chien & Ping-Yu Hsu & Jun-Der Leu, 2005. "Identification of critical failure factors in the implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in Taiwan's industries," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 219-239.
    10. Ashton, Robert H., 1976. "Deviation-amplifying feedback and unintended consequences of management accounting systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 289-300, October.
    11. Demsetz, Harold, 1969. "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Swann, G. M. Peter, 2001. "Sales practice and market evolution: the case of virtual reality," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 1119-1139, July.
    13. Stephen Fox, 2013. "Getting real about ICT," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 296-319, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milner, Mattie & Rice, Stephen & Rice, Connor, 2019. "Support for environmentally-friendly airports influenced by political affiliation and social identity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Fox, Stephen, 2019. "Addressing the influence of groupthink during ideation concerned with new applications of technology in society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 86-94.
    3. Stephen Fox, 2016. "Dismantling The Box — Applying Principles For Reducing Preconceptions During Ideation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(06), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Hayajneh, Jamal Abdelrahman .M. & Elayan, Malek Bakheet Haroun & Abdellatif, Mamdouh Abdallah Mohamed & Abubakar, A. Mohammed, 2022. "Impact of business analytics and π-shaped skills on innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Furszyfer Del Rio, D.D., 2022. "Smart but unfriendly: Connected home products as enablers of conflict," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Rodríguez, Rocio & Svensson, Göran & Mehl, Erik Jens, 2020. "Digitalization process of complex B2B sales processes – Enablers and obstacles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Freeman, Patricia K. & Freeland, Robert S., 2016. "Media framing the reception of unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States of America," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 23-29.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fox, Stephen & Aranko, Olli, 2017. "Healthcare framing: Critical realist framing for causal interdependencies and uncertainties within healthcare," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 66-72.
    2. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    3. Sickar, Michael J. & Highhouse, Scott, 1998. "Looking Closer at the Effects of Framing on Risky Choice: An Item Response Theory Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 75-91, July.
    4. Kuvaas, Bard & Selart, Marcus, 2004. "Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 198-207, November.
    5. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    6. Cristofaro, Matteo, 2020. "“I feel and think, therefore I am”: An Affect-Cognitive Theory of management decisions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 344-355.
    7. Levin, Irwin P. & Schneider, Sandra L. & Gaeth, Gary J., 1998. "All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 149-188, November.
    8. Lindner, Thomas & Puck, Jonas & Stocco, Giulia, 2023. "Asymmetric risk perception and firm financing in the institutional envelope," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    9. Efstathios Tapinos & Graham Leask & Mike Brown, 2023. "Perceived environmental turbulence and corporate strategy: The case of the UK recession," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    10. Anton Kühberger & Christian Wiener, 2012. "Explaining Risk Attitude in Framing Tasks by Regulatory Focus: A Verbal Protocol Analysis and a Simulation Using Fuzzy Logic," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 359-372, December.
    11. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2017. "The effect of cognitive diversity on the illusion of control bias in strategic decisions: An experimental investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 430-439.
    12. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, 2019. "Like student like manager? Using student subjects in managerial debiasing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 347-376, April.
    13. Roemer, Ellen & Henseler, Jörg, 2022. "The dynamics of electric vehicle acceptance in corporate fleets: Evidence from Germany," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Andreas Hönl & Philip Meissner & Torsten Wulf, 2020. "Betting the farm and playing it safe? Hyper-core self-evaluation in decisions when managers are winning and losing," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1293-1316, November.
    15. Rahman, Arifur & Crouch, Geoffrey I. & Laing, Jennifer H., 2018. "Tourists' temporal booking decisions: A study of the effect of contextual framing," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-68.
    16. Simon Gollisch & Barbara Hedderich & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2016. "Reference points and risky decision-making in agricultural trade firms: A case study in Germany," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260773, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    17. Han Bleichrodt & Jose Luis Pinto & Peter P. Wakker, 2001. "Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1498-1514, November.
    18. Gollisch, Simon & Hedderich, Barbara & Theuvsenb, Ludwig, 2018. "Strategic Preferences of Farm Supply and Grain Elevator Businesses: Empirical Evidence from Germany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    19. Gollisch, Simon & Hedderich, Barbara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Reference points and risky decision-making in agricultural trade firms: A case study in Germany," DARE Discussion Papers 1609, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    20. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2014. "Antecendents and effects of decision comprehensiveness: The role of decision quality and perceived uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 625-635.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:35:y:2013:i:4:p:306-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.