IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v44y2016icp23-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media framing the reception of unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States of America

Author

Listed:
  • Freeman, Patricia K.
  • Freeland, Robert S.

Abstract

When the United States Congress mandated implementation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) into the domestic airspace in 2012, there was substantial opposition to the policy change. Critics expressed fears regarding their threat to privacy and safety, and legislatures considered numerous bills that would significantly limit or even ban domestic unmanned flight. UAV advocates used various methods to counter UAV's negative image.

Suggested Citation

  • Freeman, Patricia K. & Freeland, Robert S., 2016. "Media framing the reception of unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States of America," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 23-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:44:y:2016:i:c:p:23-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15300269
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.11.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maddison, Jonathan & Watts, Richard, 2011. "The technological fix as a frame in media debates about tailpipe emissions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 294-303.
    2. Fox, Stephen, 2013. "The innovation big picture: Including effectiveness dependencies, efficiency dependencies, and potential negative effects within the framing of new technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 306-314.
    3. Richard Watts & Jonathan Maddison, 2012. "The role of media actors in reframing the media discourse in the decision to reject relicensing the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 131-142, June.
    4. Straub, Jeremy, 2014. "Unmanned aerial systems: Consideration of the use of force for law enforcement applications," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 100-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fox, Stephen & Aranko, Olli, 2017. "Healthcare framing: Critical realist framing for causal interdependencies and uncertainties within healthcare," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 66-72.
    2. Merkert, Rico & Bushell, James, 2020. "Managing the drone revolution: A systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milner, Mattie & Rice, Stephen & Rice, Connor, 2019. "Support for environmentally-friendly airports influenced by political affiliation and social identity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Stephen Fox, 2016. "Dismantling The Box — Applying Principles For Reducing Preconceptions During Ideation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(06), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Kitonsa, H. & Kruglikov, S. V., 2018. "Significance of drone technology for achievement of the United Nations sustainable development goals," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 4(3), pages 115-120.
    5. Hayajneh, Jamal Abdelrahman .M. & Elayan, Malek Bakheet Haroun & Abdellatif, Mamdouh Abdallah Mohamed & Abubakar, A. Mohammed, 2022. "Impact of business analytics and π-shaped skills on innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Rodríguez, Rocio & Svensson, Göran & Mehl, Erik Jens, 2020. "Digitalization process of complex B2B sales processes – Enablers and obstacles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Anania, Emily C. & Rice, Stephen & Pierce, Matthew & Winter, Scott R. & Capps, John & Walters, Nathan W. & Milner, Mattie N., 2019. "Public support for police drone missions depends on political affiliation and neighborhood demographics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 95-103.
    8. Del-Real, Cristina & Díaz-Fernández, Antonio M., 2021. "Lifeguards in the sky: Examining the public acceptance of beach-rescue drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Lily Hsueh, 2020. "Expanding the multiple streams framework to explain the formation of diverse voluntary programs: evidence from US toxic chemical use policy," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 111-123, June.
    10. Furszyfer Del Rio, D.D., 2022. "Smart but unfriendly: Connected home products as enablers of conflict," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Fox, Stephen, 2019. "Addressing the influence of groupthink during ideation concerned with new applications of technology in society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 86-94.
    12. Hodgson, Isla D. & Redpath, Steve M. & Fischer, Anke & Young, Juliette, 2018. "Fighting talk: Organisational discourses of the conflict over raptors and grouse moor management in Scotland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 332-343.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Drones; FAA; Media framing; UAV;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:44:y:2016:i:c:p:23-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.