IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v111y2016icp198-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations

Author

Listed:
  • Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée
  • Pawlowski, Jan M.
  • Ras, Eric
  • Tobias, Eric
  • Šćepanović, Snezana
  • Fitzpatrick, Dónal
  • Mehigan, Tracey
  • Steffens, Petra
  • Przygoda, Christiane
  • Schilling, Peter
  • Friedrich, Horst
  • Moebs, Sabine

Abstract

This article presents a comparative study of the barriers to open e-learning in public administrations in Luxembourg, Germany, Montenegro and Ireland. It discusses the current state of open e-learning of public administration employees at the local government level and derives the barriers to such learning. This paper's main contribution is its presentation of an empirical set of barriers in the four European countries. The results allow informed assumptions about which barriers will arise in the forthcoming use of open-source e-learning technology, particularly open educational resources as means of learning. Furthermore, this study offers a contextualised barrier framework that allows the systematic capture and comparison of challenges for future studies in the field. Other practical contributions include providing advice about open e-learning programmes, systematising lessons learned and addressing managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Ras, Eric & Tobias, Eric & Šćepanović, Snezana & Fitzpatrick, Dónal & Mehigan, Tracey & Steffens, Petra & Przygoda, Christiane & Schilling, Peter & Fri, 2016. "Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 198-208.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:198-208
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516301391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raoul Blindenbacher & Bidjan Nashat, 2010. "The Black Box of Governmental Learning : The Learning Spiral - A Concept to Organize Learning in Governments," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2474.
    2. Trochim, William M. K., 1989. "Outcome pattern matching and program theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 355-366, January.
    3. Williams, Robin & Edge, David, 1996. "The social shaping of technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 865-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stoffregen, Julia & Pawlowski, Jan M., 2018. "Theorising about barriers to open e-learning systems in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 81-91.
    2. Brem, Alexander & Viardot, Eric & Nylund, Petra A., 2021. "Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash & Muna Al-Razgan & Karishma M. Qureshi & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Ali A. Alwan, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing Barriers for Sustainable E-Learning Using Analytic Hierarchy Process-Group Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Michail N. Giannakos & Patrick Mikalef & Ilias O. Pappas, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review of E-Learning Capabilities to Enhance Organizational Learning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 619-635, April.
    7. Julia Stoffregen & Jan M. Pawlowski & Eric Ras & Snezana Scepanovic & Dragica Zugic, 2016. "Identifying Socio-Cultural Factors That Impact the Use of Open Educational Resources in Local Public Administrations," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 5(2), pages 167-187.
    8. Shakeel Ahmad & Ahmad Shukri Mohd Noor & Ali A. Alwan & Yonis Gulzar & Wazir Zada Khan & Faheem Ahmad Reegu, 2023. "eLearning Acceptance and Adoption Challenges in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stoffregen, Julia & Pawlowski, Jan M., 2018. "Theorising about barriers to open e-learning systems in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 81-91.
    2. Bassem M. Nasri & Pablo G. Collazzo & Dianne H. B. Welsh, 2021. "Home-grown middle eastern franchises: prospects for the future," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1657-1671, December.
    3. Roberts, Rhonda, 1998. "Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 159-175, June.
    4. Villarreal Larrinaga, Oskar, 2016. "Is it desirable, necessary and possible to perform research using case studies?," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    5. Benjamin Cole & Preeta Banerjee, 2013. "Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 555-574, July.
    6. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Qiu, Yixin & García, F. Javier Sendra, 2021. "Flexible pattern matching approach: Suggestions for augmenting theory evolvement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa & Ismail, Abdelrahim Fathy & Abunasser, Fathi Mohammed & Alhajhoj Alqahtani, Rafdan Hassan, 2020. "Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Geels, Frank W., 2006. "The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): The dynamics of regime transformation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1069-1082, September.
    9. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.
    10. Würmseher, Martin, 2017. "To each his own: Matching different entrepreneurial models to the academic scientist's individual needs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-17.
    11. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    12. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    13. Shern, David L. & Trochim, William M. K. & LaComb, Christina A., 1995. "The use of concept mapping for assessing fidelity of model transfer: An example from psychiatric rehabilitation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 143-153.
    14. Adel F. Almutairi & Glenn E. Gardner & Alexandra McCarthy, 2014. "Practical guidance for the use of a pattern‐matching technique in case‐study research: A case presentation," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 239-244, June.
    15. Chun, JongSerl & Kim, Jinyung & Lee, Serim, 2023. "Development of a cyberbullying victimization scale for adolescents in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Tylecote, Andrew, 2019. "Biotechnology as a new techno-economic paradigm that will help drive the world economy and mitigate climate change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 858-868.
    17. Noemi Sinkovics & Jihye Kim & Rudolf R. Sinkovics, 2022. "Business-Civil Society Collaborations in South Korea: A Multi-Stage Pattern Matching Study," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 471-516, August.
    18. Kathryn Kadous & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 108-131, March.
    19. Adamus-Matuszyńska Anna & Dzik Piotr, 2023. "The Place as a Brand. Theory and Practise of the Place Branding," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 17-29, June.
    20. Chenyang Wang & Linxiu Wang & Tiantian Gu & Enyang Hao & Yujie Chen & Huanjie Zhang, 2024. "Evaluating Smart Community Development in China from the Perspective of Residents’ Sense of Safety: An Analysis Using Criteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation and Fuzzy Comprehensive Eval," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:198-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.