IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isv/jouijm/v5y2015i2p167-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Socio-Cultural Factors That Impact the Use of Open Educational Resources in Local Public Administrations

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Stoffregen

    (University of Jyväskylä, Finland, and University of Applied Sciences Ruhr West, Germany)

  • Jan M. Pawlowski

    (University of Applied Sciences Ruhr West, Germany)

  • Eric Ras

    (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Luxembourg)

  • Snezana Scepanovic

    (University Mediterranean, Montenegro)

  • Dragica Zugic

    (University Mediterranean, Montenegro)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to define relevant barriers to the exchange of Open Educational Resources in local public administrations. Building upon a cultural model, eleven experts were interviewed and asked to evaluate several factors, such as openness in discourse, learning at the workplace, and superior support, among others. The result is a set of socio-cultural factors that shape the use of Open Educational Resources in public administrations. Significant factors are, in this respect, the independent choice of learning resources, the spirit of the platform, the range of available formats and access to technologies. Practitioners use these factors to elaborate on the readiness of public administrations towards the use of open e-Learning systems. To academic debates on culture in e-Learning, the results provide an alternative model that is contextualized to meet the demands of public sector contexts. Overall, the paper contributes to the lack of research about open e-Learning systems in the public sector, as well as regarding culture in the management of learning and knowledge exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Stoffregen & Jan M. Pawlowski & Eric Ras & Snezana Scepanovic & Dragica Zugic, 2016. "Identifying Socio-Cultural Factors That Impact the Use of Open Educational Resources in Local Public Administrations," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 5(2), pages 167-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:isv:jouijm:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:167-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.issbs.si/press/ISSN/2232-5697/5_167-187.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Arellano-Gault, 2013. "The Dilemma for the New Administrative Culture in Mexican Public Administration: Esprit de Corps or Individualist Bureaucracy?," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(13), pages 940-952.
    2. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    3. Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Ras, Eric & Tobias, Eric & Šćepanović, Snezana & Fitzpatrick, Dónal & Mehigan, Tracey & Steffens, Petra & Przygoda, Christiane & Schilling, Peter & Fri, 2016. "Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 198-208.
    4. Oliver Marschollek & Roman Beck, 2012. "Alignment of Divergent Organizational Cultures in IT Public-Private Partnerships," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(3), pages 153-162, June.
    5. Adi Katz & Dov Te’eni, 2007. "The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 261-279, April.
    6. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Daniel Robey, 1991. "Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 143-169, June.
    7. Ishtiaq Jamil & Steinar Askvik & Farhad Hossain, 2013. "Understanding Administrative Culture: Some Theoretical and Methodological Remarks," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(13), pages 900-909.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stoffregen, Julia & Pawlowski, Jan M., 2018. "Theorising about barriers to open e-learning systems in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 81-91.
    2. Meissner, Jens O., 2005. "Relationship Quality in the Context of Computer-Mediated Communication - A social constructionist approach," Working papers 2005/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    3. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. In Cho, 2015. "Facebook discontinuance: discontinuance as a temporal settlement of the constant interplay between disturbance and coping," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1531-1548, July.
    5. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    6. Fang Liu & Dongming Xu, 2018. "Social Roles and Consequences in Using Social Media in Disasters: a Structurational Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 693-711, August.
    7. Iqbal, Kiram, 2023. "Acceptance conditions of algorithmic decision support in management," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(4), pages 887-925.
    8. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1999. "Technologies-in-practice : an enacted lens for studying technology in organizations," Working papers WP 4056-99., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Sucharita Sen, 2020. "Tradition–Technology Wedlock: The Paradoxical Modernisation of Matrimony," South Asian Survey, , vol. 27(2), pages 172-190, September.
    10. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Vladislav V. Fomin & Stefan Haefliger & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 755-773, September.
    11. Kun Shin Im & Varun Grover & James T. C. Teng, 2013. "Research Note---Do Large Firms Become Smaller by Using Information Technology?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 470-491, June.
    12. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    13. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    14. Gonzalez, George C. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Galletta, Dennis F., 2012. "The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 248-262.
    15. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    16. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4907 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Weiling Ke & Lele Kang & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Chih-Hung Peng, 2021. "User Competence with Enterprise Systems: The Effects of Work Environment Factors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 860-875, September.
    19. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    20. Célia Lemaire & Thierry Nobre, 2013. "La Pre-Appropriation D'Un Outil De Gestion A L'Hopital," Post-Print hal-00992968, HAL.
    21. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isv:jouijm:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:167-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Ježovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.issbs.si .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.