IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v132y2018icp81-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorising about barriers to open e-learning systems in public administrations

Author

Listed:
  • Stoffregen, Julia
  • Pawlowski, Jan M.

Abstract

Barriers to the general use of e-learning technology are known across various contexts. Despite increasing efforts to clarify the range of these barriers, few efforts have been made to advance the theorising about them and, thus, to answer why and how they unfold. This study is motivated to overcome this unaddressed problem and develops a process model based on adaptive structuration theory (AST) and the punctuated socio-technical change model (PSIC). It represents how barriers unfold between actors, technology, and organisational properties in public administrations. The PaSIC model provides a new perspective on how critical incidents drive the emergence and progress of barriers to the general use of e-learning technology. Implications of the study clarify why particular organisational actors, properties and technology should be considered in future research in order to realise change in open e-learning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoffregen, Julia & Pawlowski, Jan M., 2018. "Theorising about barriers to open e-learning systems in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 81-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:132:y:2018:i:c:p:81-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016251630614X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trochim, William M. K., 1989. "Outcome pattern matching and program theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 355-366, January.
    2. Fuenfschilling, Lea & Truffer, Bernhard, 2016. "The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 298-312.
    3. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    4. Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Ras, Eric & Tobias, Eric & Šćepanović, Snezana & Fitzpatrick, Dónal & Mehigan, Tracey & Steffens, Petra & Przygoda, Christiane & Schilling, Peter & Fri, 2016. "Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 198-208.
    5. Kompella, Lakshminarayana, 2017. "E-Governance systems as socio-technical transitions using multi-level perspective with case studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 80-94.
    6. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Daniel Robey, 1991. "Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 143-169, June.
    7. Williams, Robin & Edge, David, 1996. "The social shaping of technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 865-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brem, Alexander & Viardot, Eric & Nylund, Petra A., 2021. "Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash & Muna Al-Razgan & Karishma M. Qureshi & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Ali A. Alwan, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing Barriers for Sustainable E-Learning Using Analytic Hierarchy Process-Group Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Szopiński, Tomasz & Bachnik, Katarzyna, 2022. "Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Stoffregen & Jan M. Pawlowski & Eric Ras & Snezana Scepanovic & Dragica Zugic, 2016. "Identifying Socio-Cultural Factors That Impact the Use of Open Educational Resources in Local Public Administrations," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 5(2), pages 167-187.
    2. Meissner, Jens O., 2005. "Relationship Quality in the Context of Computer-Mediated Communication - A social constructionist approach," Working papers 2005/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    3. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. In Cho, 2015. "Facebook discontinuance: discontinuance as a temporal settlement of the constant interplay between disturbance and coping," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1531-1548, July.
    5. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    6. Fang Liu & Dongming Xu, 2018. "Social Roles and Consequences in Using Social Media in Disasters: a Structurational Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 693-711, August.
    7. Iqbal, Kiram, 2023. "Acceptance conditions of algorithmic decision support in management," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(4), pages 887-925.
    8. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1999. "Technologies-in-practice : an enacted lens for studying technology in organizations," Working papers WP 4056-99., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Sucharita Sen, 2020. "Tradition–Technology Wedlock: The Paradoxical Modernisation of Matrimony," South Asian Survey, , vol. 27(2), pages 172-190, September.
    10. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel & Benz, Lukas & Hartmann, Evi & Matzner, Martin, 2022. "Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Benamar, Lamya & Balagué, Christine & Zhong, Zeling, 2020. "Internet of Things devices appropriation process: The Dynamic Interactions Value Appropriation (DIVA) framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Vladislav V. Fomin & Stefan Haefliger & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 755-773, September.
    13. Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Ras, Eric & Tobias, Eric & Šćepanović, Snezana & Fitzpatrick, Dónal & Mehigan, Tracey & Steffens, Petra & Przygoda, Christiane & Schilling, Peter & Fri, 2016. "Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 198-208.
    14. Zhang, Huiping & Tang, Zhiwei & Jayakar, Krishna, 2018. "A socio-technical analysis of China's cybersecurity policy: Towards delivering trusted e-government services," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 409-420.
    15. Kun Shin Im & Varun Grover & James T. C. Teng, 2013. "Research Note---Do Large Firms Become Smaller by Using Information Technology?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 470-491, June.
    16. Bassem M. Nasri & Pablo G. Collazzo & Dianne H. B. Welsh, 2021. "Home-grown middle eastern franchises: prospects for the future," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1657-1671, December.
    17. Roberts, Rhonda, 1998. "Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 159-175, June.
    18. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    19. Villarreal Larrinaga, Oskar, 2016. "Is it desirable, necessary and possible to perform research using case studies?," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    20. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:132:y:2018:i:c:p:81-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.