IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i6p962-968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Carter, Owen B.J.
  • Patterson, Lisa J.
  • Donovan, Robert J.
  • Ewing, Michael T.
  • Roberts, Clare M.

Abstract

Evidence suggests that until 8 years of age most children are cognitively incapable of appreciating the commercial purpose of television advertising and are particularly vulnerable to its persuasive techniques. After this age most children begin to describe the 'selling' intent of advertising and it is widely assumed this equips them with sufficient cognitive defences to protect against advertisers' persuasion attempts. However, much of the previous literature has been criticised for failing to differentiate between children's awareness of 'selling' versus 'persuasive' intent, the latter representing a more sophisticated understanding and superior cognitive defence. Unfortunately there is little literature to suggest at what age awareness of 'persuasive intent' emerges; our aim was to address this important issue. Children (n = 594) were recruited from each grade from Pre-primary (4-5 years) to Grade 7 (11-12 years) from ten primary schools in Perth, Western Australia and exposed to a McDonald's television advertisement. Understanding the purpose of television advertising was assessed both nonverbally (picture indication) and verbally (small discussion groups of 3-4), with particular distinction made between selling versus persuasive intent. Consistent with previous literature, a majority of children described the 'selling' intent of television advertising by 7-8 years both nonverbally and verbally, increasing to 90% by 11-12 years. Awareness of 'persuasive' intent emerged slowly as a function of age but even by our oldest age-group was only 40%. Vulnerability to television advertising may persist until children are far older than previously thought. These findings have important implications regarding the debate surrounding regulation of junk food (and other) advertising aimed at children.

Suggested Citation

  • Carter, Owen B.J. & Patterson, Lisa J. & Donovan, Robert J. & Ewing, Michael T. & Roberts, Clare M., 2011. "Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 962-968, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:6:p:962-968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(11)00061-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, Elizabeth S & Lutz, Richard J, 2000. "Children, Advertising, and Product Experiences: A Multimethod Inquiry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 31-48, June.
    2. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Macklin, M Carole, 1987. "Preschoolers' Understanding of the Informational Function of Television Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(2), pages 229-239, September.
    4. John, Deborah Roedder, 1999. "Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(3), pages 183-213, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Cornwell, T. Bettina & Yuan, Hong, 2021. "I know what you are thinking: How theory of mind is employed in product evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 405-422.
    2. Landwehr, Stefanie C. & Hartmann, Monika, 2020. "Industry self-regulation of food advertisement to children: Compliance versus effectiveness of the EU Pledge," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Landwehr, Stefanie C. & Hartmann, Monika, 2016. "Does self regulation work? The case of television food advertisement to children in Germany," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235881, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Fabrizio Carmignani & Grace Lordan & Kam Ki Tang, 2012. "Does Donor Assistance For Hiv Respond To Media Pressure?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S1), pages 18-32, June.
    5. David Rowthorn, 2019. "Is Child Advertising Inherently Unfair?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 603-615, September.
    6. Michaela Jackson & Paul Harrison & Boyd Swinburn & Mark Lawrence, 2015. "Marketing ethics in context: the promotion of unhealthy foods and beverages to children," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 17, pages 354-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Valentina Nicolini & Fabio Cassia, 2022. "The influence of PSA's likeability on children’s intentions to eat healthy food," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(1), pages 15-36, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yann Verhellen & Caroline Oates & Patrick Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens, 2014. "Children’s Responses to Traditional Versus Hybrid Advertising Formats: The Moderating Role of Persuasion Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 235-255, June.
    2. Jong Yoon Lee & Jae Hee Park & Jong Woo Jun, 2019. "Brand Webtoon as Sustainable Advertising in Korean Consumers: A Focus on Hierarchical Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Iris Vermeir & Dieneke Sompel, 2014. "Assessing the What Is Beautiful Is Good Stereotype and the Influence of Moderately Attractive and Less Attractive Advertising Models on Self-Perception, Ad Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions of 8–13-Y," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 205-233, June.
    4. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Buijzen, Moniek, 2012. "Effects of Prominence, Involvement, and Persuasion Knowledge on Children's Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advergames," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 33-42.
    5. Delia Cristina Balaban & Meda Mucundorfeanu & Larisa Ioana Mureșan, 2022. "Adolescents’ Understanding of the Model of Sponsored Content of Social Media Influencer Instagram Stories," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 305-316.
    6. Yana R. Avramova & Patrick De Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens, 2018. "How reading in a foreign versus native language moderates the impact of repetition-induced brand placement prominence on placement responses," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 500-518, November.
    7. Anna Elizabeth Coates & Charlotte Alice Hardman & Jason Christian Grovenor Halford & Paul Christiansen & Emma Jane Boyland, 2020. "“It’s Just Addictive People That Make Addictive Videos” : Children’s Understanding of and Attitudes towards Influencer Marketing of Food and Beverages by YouTube Video Bloggers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Hudders, Liselot & Vanwesenbeeck, Ini & Cauberghe, Veroline & van Berlo, Zeph M.C., 2020. "Effects of Disclosing Influencer Marketing in Videos: An Eye Tracking Study Among Children in Early Adolescence," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 94-106.
    9. Kumar Saurabh & Tanuj Nandan, 2019. "Role of financial knowledge, financial socialisation and financial risk attitude in financial satisfaction of Indian individuals," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 104-122.
    10. Oliver Büttner & Arnd Florack & Benjamin Serfas, 2014. "A Dual-Step and Dual-Process Model of Advertising Effects: Implications for Reducing the Negative Impact of Advertising on Children's Consumption Behaviour," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 161-182, June.
    11. Reifurth, Katherine R.N. & Wear, Henry T. & Heere, Bob, 2020. "Creating fans from scratch: A qualitative analysis of child consumer brand perceptions of a new sport team," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 428-442.
    12. Feenstra, Florence & Muzellec, Laurent & de Faultrier, Brigitte & Boulay, Jacques, 2015. "Edutainment experiences for children in retail stores, from a child’s perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-56.
    13. Yasare Aktas Arnas*, 2016. "Children’S Understanding Of Television Commercials: A Qualitative Approach," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 2(1), pages 45-51.
    14. Boerman, Sophie C. & Willemsen, Lotte M. & Van Der Aa, Eva P., 2017. "“This Post Is Sponsored”," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 82-92.
    15. Chan, Kara & McNeal, James U., 2006. "Chinese children's understanding of commercial communications: A comparison of cognitive development and social learning models," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 36-56, February.
    16. Lee, Alice J. & Ames, Daniel R., 2017. "“I can’t pay more” versus “It’s not worth more”: Divergent effects of constraint and disparagement rationales in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 16-28.
    17. Hota, Monali & Bartsch, Fabian, 2019. "Consumer socialization in childhood and adolescence: Impact of psychological development and family structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 11-20.
    18. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    19. Ovca, Andrej & Jevšnik, Mojca & Jereb, Gregor & Raspor, Peter, 2016. "Effect of educational intervention on young people, targeting microbiological hazards in domestic kitchens," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 156-162.
    20. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:6:p:962-968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.